Amanda Hughes – Constituting America

About Amanda Hughes

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Amanda Hughes contributed 612 entries already.

Entries by Amanda Hughes

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 90: Conclusion: Preserving the First Principles of the American Founding – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Conclusion: Preserving the First Principles of the American Founding

In this series of essays, written by exceptionally thoughtful thinkers, teachers and scholars, we can discern how insightful the American Founders were in recognizing and articulating the first principles upon which the nation of America was founded. These essays reveal that Americans, and especially the Founders, had learned extensively from the careful study of history. Born of English tradition, Americans gradually came to develop their own identity – one might even say “mind,” as Thomas Jefferson called it. Separated from Great Britain and largely left alone for decades, American colonists lived in relative freedom and came to establish local governments and social institutions that complemented their understanding of rights and liberties. They frequently heard these ideas of individual liberty and limited government reinforced in their churches, newspapers, shops, and businesses. The essays in the 90-Day Study, as a whole, show the story of how Americans became one people united by common principles.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 87: Upholding the Principle of Free Civil Discourse and Public Debate Without Censorship – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary Porter

Upholding the Principle of Free Civil Discourse and Public Debate Without Censorship

In ratifying the United States Constitution, Virginia, North Carolina and Rhode Island (both of which copied Virginia’s submission verbatim) all proposed a free speech amendment and James Madison included an amendment, which read: “That the people have a right to freedom of speech, and of writing and publishing their sentiments; that the freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty, and ought not to be violated.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 62: Upholding the Principle of Amending the United States Constitution by the American People, Its Rightful Keepers – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Upholding the Principle of Amending the United States Constitution by the American People, Its Rightful Keepers

James Madison mentioned in Federalist 51 that the Constitution requires the government “to control itself.” With arguments on both sides, correctly amending the Constitution remains in maintaining the principle that “the United States Constitution prescribes within the document the only lawful methods of amendment, by its keepers, the American people.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 61: Principle of a United States Constitution Prescribing Within Itself the Only Lawful Methods of Amendments, by Its Keepers, the American People – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Principle of a United States Constitution Prescribing Within Itself the Only Lawful Methods of Amendments, by Its Keepers, the American People

Virginia’s George Mason rose and cautioned that: “No amendments of the proper kind would ever be obtained by the people, if the Government should become oppressive (as Madison wrote in his notes), as he verily believed would be the case.”

READ MORE

Kevin Portteus, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 71: Principle of Secure Borders – Guest Essayist: Kevin Portteus, Kevin Portteus, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Secure Borders

Borders, however, do more than protect a people’s rights, sovereignty, and safety. They separate between culture and values that are specific to a people. The Founders understood this as well. With this understanding by the Founders, how would it be possible to maintain what makes America its own nation able to self-govern apart from any dictatorships that could take hold? As President, John Adams wrote “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” meaning that the nation of Americans possesses a specifically chosen cultural infrastructure, and the American people have historically adopted certain moral values, that make its system of constitutional self-government possible. This system, in turn, makes it possible for Americans to enjoy their natural rights. Other peoples, and other cultures, antithetical to that system of government, are thus a mortal threat to America’s political system and way of life, and Jefferson cautioned against a mass influx of peoples with opposing cultures and values, to those of America’s, in Notes on the State of Virginia.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Amanda Hughes, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 69: Principle of Distinguishing Between Purpose of Federal, and Governments of the States – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes

Principle of Distinguishing Between Purpose of Federal, and Governments of the States: Maintaining the Union While Preventing Federal Encroachments on the States and Individual Americans

“The State governments possess inherent advantages, which will ever give them an influence and ascendency over the National Government, and will for ever preclude the possibility of federal encroachments.” Hamilton made it plain he sympathized with the states: “That their liberties, indeed, can be subverted by the federal head, is repugnant to every rule of political calculation.” In other words, keep the states intact, as a bulwark of freedom for themselves, and as a bulwark against national impingement. This is part of the genius of the Constitution: for every legitimate power, there’s a legitimate counter-power.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 82: Principle of Free Thought and Speech, a Core Component of a Self-Governing People – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Free Thought and Speech, a Core Component of a Self-Governing People

The debates took place in the secret Philadelphia convention, but the vigorous conversation moved into state ratifying conventions, newspapers and pamphlets, private letters, and taverns. In the early republic, the George Washington presidential administration had its share of highly partisan and contentious debates. The debates over Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton’s financial plans and the crafting of American foreign policy were rooted in constitutionalism and establishing the right precedents for the new government as prescribed in the new Constitution. These deliberations could be offensive and personal, but they were also deeply rooted in constitutionalism as both sides took the document seriously. In all of these debates, the key principle was the element of free speech. The representatives and the people freely asserted their views about the best ways to achieve good government.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, George Landrith 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 83: Principle of Freedom of Association, Undissolved and Unweakened, Either to Associate or Not, and Neither under Coercion nor Force – Guest Essayist: George Landrith, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, George Landrith

Principle of Freedom of Association, Undissolved and Unweakened, Either to Associate or Not, and Neither under Coercion nor Force

America’s Founders would see the freedom of association as foundational to a free society. They had gathered together and worked together to promote American independence. And the British Crown had attempted to make those associations a criminal activity. America’s Founders understood that they would have to associate and work with other Americans who shared their desire for independence. The British attempt to deny them the right to associate with like-minded Americans was simply an attempt to silence them and prevent them from petitioning the government for redress of their grievances. And only after years of presenting their grievances and being entirely rebuffed did they finally decide to declare their independence.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 80: Principle of Constitutional Limits on the United States Government To Tax – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Constitutional Limits on the United States Government To Tax

The Boston Tea Party in late 1773 was the clearest expression of colonial opposition to being taxed without consent. The British retaliated harshly with the Coercive Acts shutting down the Port of Boston, banning town meetings and self-government, and allowing British colonial officials to escape American justice. This course led to the First Continental Congress and the first shots of the war being fired at Lexington and Concord. One of the grievances of the Declaration of Independence was “imposing Taxes on us without our Consent.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 89: Principle of a Nation’s Longevity Upon Consisting of Public and Private Virtue – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of a Nation’s Longevity Upon Consisting of Public and Private Virtue

Samuel Adams’s letter to James Warren quoted in the introduction to this essay tied stable government and individual liberty to virtue and bound private and public virtue to each other. This emphasis on the interdependent virtue of the citizen and of the society was the essence of classical republicanism and a fundamental concept in the political philosophy of Greek and Roman writers. Moreover, Adams confided to his fellow New Englander that it was the “Principles & Manners” of that region which produced the spirit of liberty that fueled the drive to American independence.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 86: Principle of Civil Discourse To Keep Representative Government, Unhindered Freedom of Speech in the Airing of Grievances – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Civil Discourse To Keep Representative Government, Unhindered Freedom of Speech in the Airing of Grievances

At the heart of a representative government lies the principle that those in power are there to serve, and not to dictate. They are but emissaries, chosen by the populace to voice their hopes, aspirations, and concerns. Such representation is hollow if the populace cannot, or is afraid to, communicate openly. Civil discourse, which is simply the ability to discuss and debate matters of public interest in a reasoned and respectful manner, is the bedrock upon which representative government stands. Without it, the bridge between the representatives and those they represent is broken. The essence of representative government is lost if its constituents cannot engage in free discourse without fear of persecution.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 85: Principle of Freedom of Assembly – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Principle of Freedom of Assembly

A series of five punitive acts were passed by Parliament intended to restrict public discourse and punish opponents. It was England’s hope the “Intolerable Acts” would intimidate rebellious Colonists into submission. The “Acts” ignited a firestorm of outrage throughout Colonial America. More importantly, it generated a unity of purpose and inspired a willingness for collective action among leaders in the previously fragmented American colonies. In a bold “illegal” act to assert its right to free assembly, the First Continental Congress met in the Carpenters Hall in Philadelphia from September 5 to October 26, 1774. Twelve of the thirteen colonies (Georgia opted out) were represented.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 88: Principle of Freedom of Religion – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

Principle of Freedom of Religion

The Framers so valued religious liberty that they placed it as the first liberty protected by the Bill of Rights. And unlike contemporary critics who see religion as divisive, the Framers valued religion for contributing to the civic virtue and welfare of society. For the constitutional Framers, freedom of religion was necessary not just to protect what was considered the most important individual liberty, but to protect the vitality and thriving of religious beliefs and institutions that in turn did much to strengthen society.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 79: Defending Liberty and Rights in Property Through the Fruits of One’s Own Labor – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Defending Liberty and Rights in Property Through the Fruits of One’s Own Labor

Another threat to the rights in property was expropriation and redistribution of land. Many Revolutionary War era state legislatures found it impossible to resist the lure of seizing property owned by British subjects and American Loyalists and reselling it to American Patriots, either settlers or speculators. But, in general, there probably was nothing that more viscerally frightened and repelled most Americans than redistribution of property. Many Americans reacted in shock to the alleged goal of Daniel Shays and his followers to force a redistribution of land. There was no less opposition to a peaceful redistribution of land through what were called “agrarian laws.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 78: Principle of Keeping the Fruits of One’s Own Labor – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Keeping the Fruits of One’s Own Labor

The right to engage in labor of one’s choosing, and the right to retain the fruits thereof in the form of property, are central to one’s liberty, yet experience has shown that governments have threatened these rights repeatedly. Taxes, notably those on land or its produce, were particularly suspect because they could deprive people of their most basic means of subsistence and status, while benefiting some favored politically powerful individual or group.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 84: Principle of a Free Press – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

Principle of a Free Press

The American press played a major role in opposing British rule. The distinct gain in prestige made by the press during the revolutionary period began with the Stamp Act, the repeal of which was recognized as the result of a united colonial opposition made possible by the important role played by the newspapers of the day.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, Stephen Tootle, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 77: Principle of Free Market Trade, Industry, Innovation and Competition – Guest Essayist: Stephen Tootle, Stephen Tootle, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Free Market Trade, Industry, Innovation and Competition

Property then, was more than simply money, wealth, land, or objects. Madison understood that one could not claim to have free opinions without being free from violence when communicating those ideas. One could not freely express religious belief and practice when personal safety and property were threatened. The freedom to choose where to work, what to work for, and what to do with the product of one’s work were inseparable. All were rights. All were inseparable from property.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 72: Principle of Private Property Ownership To Sustain Liberty, Encourage Commerce and Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Private Property Ownership To Sustain Liberty, Encourage Commerce and Independence

In his Second Treatise of Government (1689), Locke wrote that all humans are in a state of nature, free and equal in their natural rights. For Locke, property was the most important natural right, and it included possessions but also most significantly a property in one’s person, labor, and rights. He wrote, “Yet every man has a property in his own person…The labour of his body, and the work of his hands.” Government was established by common consent for the purpose of protecting a person’s property rights. He wrote, “The great and chief end, therefore, of men’s uniting into commonwealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 76: Principle of Making Personal Contracts – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Principle of Making Personal Contracts

The freedom to contract and the expectation that contractual obligations will be enforced has been critical to American economic life since its founding. Courts have long been involved in the settling of contractual disputes, sometimes invoking the contract clause, but more often using common law principles or provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, which every state has adopted. But the implications of the freedom to contract is not limited to economic matters. Contracts are involved in many forms of association, including political organizations and civic and religious entities. Without protection for these contracts, these associations could not function effectively.

READ MORE

Robert E. Wright, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 75: Principle of Money With Intrinsic Value and Standards of Weights and Measures, Printing Money – Guest Essayist: Robert E. Wright, Robert E. Wright, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Money With Intrinsic Value and Standards of Weights and Measures, Printing Money

From its inception, America defined its dollar in terms of specie, eventually settling, as most other nations did, on gold alone. Dollar denominated banknotes and deposits were not legal tender but convertible into legal tender coins on demand. They circulated because they were more convenient than coins but always could be exchanged for them.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 81: Principle of Freedom of Speech in a Marketplace of Ideas – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

Principle of Freedom of Speech in a Marketplace of Ideas

Just because speech might be problematic or even contrary to government policy, it should not be prohibited by law, according to Holmes. Instead, the speech’s ability to gain approval in the social marketplace of ideas should determine its worth and staying power, Holmes argued. Only through the open competition of free and unhindered speech can society discover the truth necessary to govern itself.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 73: Principle of Individual Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of One’s Own Happiness – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Individual Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of One’s Own Happiness

If there was one political principle which was ubiquitous during the founding period, it was the natural, unalienable rights of the colonists. Early Americans almost never missed an opportunity to proclaim them. As Thomas West argues, “the founders shared a ‘theoretically coherent understanding’ of politics rooted in natural rights philosophy.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 74: Principle of Individual Free Enterprise – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Individual Free Enterprise

The connection between the Constitution’s protection of private property rights and individual free enterprise is a testament to the profound wisdom of our Founding Fathers. Their understanding of human nature, individual freedom, and economic principles enabled them to construct a system that has fostered unprecedented prosperity and liberty.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 70: Principle of Private Property Ownership of Land To Encourage Self-Reliance for Maintaining and Strengthening Individual Liberty and American Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Private Property Ownership of Land To Encourage Self-Reliance for Maintaining and Strengthening Individual Liberty and American Independence

Whereas Jefferson returned to the theme of his republic of farmers and artisans in frequent correspondences, he was not a systematic theorist of American agrarianism. That description best fits John Taylor of Caroline County, Virginia. Taylor was a lawyer, planter, military officer, and politician. He engaged in scientific agriculture, becoming a leader in promoting crop rotation, and published pamphlets and a book about those endeavors. He also wrote several books about political economy and the connection among land ownership, private happiness, independence defined as republican self-government, liberty, a limited and decentralized political system, division of political powers, and the laissez-faire economics of a free market.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 29: Corruption and the Constitution: Principle of Constitutional Law and a Foundation of a Virtuous and Moral People – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, William Morrisey PhD

Corruption and the Constitution: Principle of Constitutional Law and a Foundation of a Virtuous and Moral People

Corruption means rottenness—disintegration caused not by external pressure but by some inner flaw. Political corruption occurs when a ruler, responsible for the country’s good, the good of the citizens, instead uses his authority to obtain a private benefit—something that seems good for himself, his family, his friends. Distrust and faction then weaken the body politic.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 68: Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government Upon Protecting the People From Violence and Fraud – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government Upon Protecting the People From Violence and Fraud

In the true spirit of the American founding, George Mason’s assertion during the Federal Convention of 1787 deeply resonates with our contemporary political and social landscape. As he opined, a lack of virtue and unchecked corruption pose significant threats to the integrity and endurance of our government. Today, as we explore the principle of the appropriate role and purpose of government in protecting people from violence and fraud, we must bear these foundational truths in mind. We must also heed the wisdom of Mason, understanding the immense potential of the government as a force for good, but also the catastrophic possibilities when it strays from the path of virtue and integrity.

READ MORE

James P. Pinkerton, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 67: Principle of Strong Defense Capability To Protect the United States Against the Danger and Severity of Treason – Guest Essayist: James P. Pinkerton, James P. Pinkerton, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Strong Defense Capability To Protect the United States Against the Danger and Severity of Treason

The freedoms accorded to us by the Constitution have made us prosperous, of course, in no small part because liberty makes the U.S. a magnet for talent from around the world—four of the top Manhattan Project scientists were born in Hungary, and none of them were spies. Those strengths give us the capacity to build wonder-weapons such as the atomic bomb. And yet that same freedom makes it harder for us to keep secret our secrets.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 66: Principle of Unity as Americans, Limiting Faction Through Election Only of Representatives Who Understand and Will Uphold the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Unity as Americans, Limiting Faction Through Election Only of Representatives Who Understand and Will Uphold the United States Constitution

“Let us also be mindful that the cause of freedom greatly depends on the use we make of the singular opportunities we enjoy of governing ourselves wisely; for if the event should prove, that the people of this country either cannot or will not govern themselves, who will hereafter be advocates for systems, which however charming in theory and prospect. are not reducible to practice. If the people of our nation, instead of consenting to be governed by laws of their own making, and rulers of their own choosing,”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 65: Principle of Civil Over Military Authority: Protection Against Corruption, Foreign or Domestic Attempts To Divide and Destroy America – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Civil Over Military Authority: Protection Against Corruption, Foreign or Domestic Attempts To Divide and Destroy America

The rebellion against the government was averted by the character of George Washington, who dedicated himself to the republican principle of military deference to the civilian government. He learned about the Newburgh conspiracy and strode into the appropriately-named Temple of Virtue on the symbolically-fraught March 15—the Ides of March. In the Newburgh Address, he called on his soldiers to stop those who would “overturn the liberties of our country, and who wickedly attempt to open the flood gates of civil discord.” Washington continued: “This dreadful alternative, of either deserting our Country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our Arms against it…what can this writer have in view, by recommending such measures? Can he be a friend to the Army? Can he be a friend to this Country?”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 64: Principle of Peace, Commerce and Honest Friendship With All Nations, Entangling Alliances With None – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Peace, Commerce and Honest Friendship With All Nations, Entangling Alliances With None

Washington and his Cabinet along with members of Congress had to formulate the principles and policies of American foreign policy according to the dictates of constitutionalism, American ideals, and prudence. The outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 and its expansionary wars compounded the difficulties of American diplomacy in the early 1790s. President Washington had to navigate these shoals keeping in mind that the new nation was weak compared to the great empires. The United States had only a small army and not much of a navy. The economy was similarly weak as the country was locked out of former markets in the British West Indies and had to get its public credit in order by paying off the Revolutionary War debt. National security was a priority for the Washington administration but securing it would not be easy.

READ MORE

Principle of Maintaining Freedom and Independence Through an Armed Citizenry: Right To Protect One’s Person and Property by the Personal Keeping and Bearing of Arms

It is this right of self-defense exercised through a personal right to keep and bear arms that is reflected in the language of the Second Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story made that point in a famous passage in his influential 1833 work on the Constitution. “The militia is the natural defence of a free country,” he wrote. “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 30: Principle of One Nation Under God – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary Porter

Principle of One Nation Under God

In his first Thanksgiving Proclamation as President, Washington began by insisting that “it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favors.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 44: Principle of Establishing Justice Through the Rule of Law – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Establishing Justice Through the Rule of Law

The principle of establishing justice through the rule of law is a means of guarding against gradual erosion of law and order into chaos to break down America’s system of self-governing. It guards against eventually ushering in tyranny to control the people rather than protect liberty by protecting the rule of law.

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Eric Wise 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 60: Principle of Representative Government Only Under Authority of the American People – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Eric Wise

Principle of Representative Government Only Under Authority of the American People

Suffice it to say, the principle of representation is an enduring opinion that is at the heart of what it means to be an American. But like many such opinions that spring from what Abraham Lincoln called “the mystic chords of memory” does anyone really know, concretely, what it means?

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tara Ross 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 59: Principle of Free, Fair, Independent Elections Involving Preservation of the Electoral College – Guest Essayist: Tara Ross, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tara Ross

Principle of Free, Fair, Independent Elections Involving Preservation of the Electoral College

George Mason, delegate from Virginia, emphasized that “the genius of the people must be consulted.” Pennsylvania delegate James Wilson agreed that “[n]o government could long subsist without the confidence of the people.” Governmental authority, he concluded, must “flow immediately from the legitimate source of all authority. . . the mind or sense of the people at large. The Legislature ought to be the most exact transcript of the whole Society.”

READ MORE

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 58: Principle of Republican and Limited Form of Government, Representative Through American Citizens Voting in Free and Frequent Elections – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Republican and Limited Form of Government, Representative Through American Citizens Voting in Free and Frequent Elections

Advocates of republican systems long have insisted on certain features in a government to qualify it as a republic. Among those are the right to vote vested in a variable, yet sufficiently substantial, portion of adult residents, the election of the important figures in government, regular elections, short terms for those elected, rotation in office through restrictions on re-election, and the right of voters to recall elected officials. The objectives of these conditions are to keep the governing members responsive to the people’s wishes, to promote fresh blood in positions of authority, and to allow more persons to participate in governing, thereby bestowing legitimacy on the system even in the eyes of those who may lose a particular political contest.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 57: Principle of No Passage, Federal or State, of Ex Post Facto Laws – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of No Passage, Federal or State, of Ex Post Facto Laws

The Framers of the United States Constitution considered ex post facto laws and bills of attainder so repugnant to justice that the document expressly bans them twice. In Article I, Section 9, the prohibition applies to the federal government. The subsequent section of the charter likewise targets state enactments. These provisions are a proto bill of rights in the body of the original document, which makes them unusual in that opponents of the Constitution often cited the lack of a bill of rights as the reason for their stance. Still more thought-provoking is the claim often made then that such laws would be invalid even without an express constitutional provision. That position required its advocates to appeal to higher principles of justice or law as limiting the power of legislatures.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 56: Principle of a Grand Jury Indictment of Capital Crimes Before a Person May Be Held to Account – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Principle of a Grand Jury Indictment of Capital Crimes Before a Person May Be Held to Account

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Janine Turner The principle of requiring grand jury indictment prior to trial for a capital or other infamous crime has a long and somewhat checkered history in American and English jurisprudence. Today, the primary task of a grand jury is to determine whether there is sufficient cause […]

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 55: Principle of Right to a Speedy Trial by a Jury of Peers, Public and Impartial, Without Cruel or Unusual Punishments – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Principle of Right to a Speedy Trial by a Jury of Peers, Public and Impartial, Without Cruel or Unusual Punishments

The right to a trial by jury is one of the core principles of the Anglo-American constitutional tradition. The trial by jury ensures that the government is limited, essential rights are protected, and the rule of law is preserved. As Thomas Jefferson noted to Thomas Paine, “I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”

90 in 90 2023, James S. Humphreys, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 54: Principle of No Unreasonable Searches and Seizures – Guest Essayist: James Humphreys, James S. Humphreys, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of No Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

Essay Read By Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects Americans from “unreasonable searches and seizures” by government officials. The Fourth Amendment was ratified in 1791 along with the other nine amendments in the Bill of Rights. It reads, “The rights of the people to […]

Benjamin Slomski, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 53: Principle of Courts With Justices Who Hold Their Offices During Good Behavior – Guest Essayist: Ben Slomski, Benjamin Slomski, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Courts With Justices Who Hold Their Offices During Good Behavior

Good behavior for judges is understood in the sense of carrying out one’s duties in a judicial manner. Judges act consistently with their constitutional charge when they remember that they are judges tasked with the application of the Constitution and the laws to particular legal cases. Judges stray from this responsibility when they seek to exercise the functions of legislating or executing laws and impose their will rather than the Constitution. Impeachment by Congress remains as a check on judges who misuse their office.

90 in 90 2023, Eric Sands, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 52: Principle of Freedom of a Person Under the Protection of Habeas Corpus – Guest Essayist: Eric C. Sands, Eric Sands, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Freedom of a Person Under the Protection of Habeas Corpus

It has been around since the Middle Ages. It’s been called the second Magna Carta by some, and the “great writ” by others. What we are referring to is habeas corpus, a Latin phrase meaning “you should have the body.” Put most simply, habeas corpus allows a person who has been detained the chance to challenge that detention in court. This prevents the government from holding an individual indefinitely without bringing charges against them. In the American system of justice, habeas corpus applies both at the federal and state level.

Ben Peterson, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 51: Principle of Innocent of Any Crime Until Proven Guilty – Guest Essayist: Ben Peterson, Ben Peterson, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Innocent of Any Crime Until Proven Guilty

Pennington’s point that the English common law isn’t the primary source of the presumption of innocence notwithstanding, we find an assertion of the importance of due process of law, the idea that government must demonstrate guilt via a legal process established in advance before depriving a citizen of life, liberty, or property, in the Magna Charta (1215): “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.” The presumption of innocence, a legal principle with deep and broad roots in ancient, medieval, and modern tradition and experience, is a central part of the constitutional and legal order in the United States.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 50: Principle of Due Process of Law – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Principle of Due Process of Law

In Clause 39 of the Magna Carta, the essence of due process is expressed in the following terms: “No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.” At the very least, this provision limited the power of the crown to take arbitrary or capricious injurious actions that were not sanctioned by law. The phrase “law of the land” later found its way into many of the provisions of American state constitutions, although the phrase “due process of law” was also used, with apparently very similar if not identical meaning. Many of the early state courts, applying this language, considered the protections of due process or the law of the land to be a means of preventing governments from carrying out policies threatening vested rights in property of their citizens, although it could also protect their personal liberty.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 49: Principle of a Political System with Criminal and Civil Law – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Principle of a Political System with Criminal and Civil Law

As Story noted, a “free” public would be “jealous” of its power to use their elected, political representatives to make decisions on the removal of civil officers found to be guilty of misconduct. That kind of decision, if made by unelected judges, would outrage the public. As is often the case, the public has expectations about what kinds of decisions an institution within the government should make.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 48: Principle of Equal Under the Law – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

Principle of Equal Under the Law

From the most powerful to the penniless, all are to be treated equally under the law, from due process rights to the rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. A mental image of the concept can be had by taking a look at statues of Lady Justice, who has balanced scales before her and a blindfold over her eyes, so that impartiality is the standard by which all under the law are judged.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 47: Principle of Justice for All – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Justice for All

The United States Constitution, ratified in 1788, has stood as a beacon of democratic principles and rule of law for over two centuries. One of its most profound contributions is the pursuit of “justice for all,” an ideal engraved in the Pledge of Allegiance. The preamble to the Constitution sets the tone by stating one of the document’s purposes as to “establish Justice.” This phrase signifies the Framers’ intent to create a system of governance that promotes fair treatment and equality under the law, a cornerstone of justice.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 46: Mandate or Law: The American Founders on Warning Against Arbitrary, Tyrannical Dictates Diluting Rule of Law – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Mandate or Law: The American Founders on Warning Against Arbitrary, Tyrannical Dictates Diluting Rule of Law

In the realm of United States governance, the terms “mandate” and “law” frequently arise, often creating confusion due to their seemingly overlapping meanings. Both play essential roles in shaping the country’s legal and political landscape, yet they are distinctly different in nature and application—and both must be understood within the context of due process of law, both substantive and procedural.

90 in 90 2023, Winfield H. Rose, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 31: Principle of Consent of the Governed: Upholding Appropriate Boundaries Against Governing by Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Winfield H. Rose, Winfield H. Rose, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Consent of the Governed: Upholding Appropriate Boundaries Against Governing by Tyranny

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner “…that the King with and by the authority of parliament, is able to make laws and statutes of sufficient force and validity to limit and bind the crown, and the descent, limitation, inheritance and government thereof” is founded on the principles of liberty and the British constitution: […]

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, George Landrith 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 45: Careful Observance Upon Forming and Executing Laws: Principle of the Rule of Law, Not of Men – Guest Essayist: George Landrith, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, George Landrith

Careful Observance Upon Forming and Executing Laws: Principle of the Rule of Law, Not of Men

Part of our national heritage in the Rule of Law means that we ought not care whether we like or dislike the accused, or whether we agree with the politics of the accused. We ought to be concerned only about the law and its equal and fair application. The Rule of Law is a major check against the abuses of government. Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin once described his totalitarian view of the law as — “show me the man, and I’ll find the crime.” That is obviously not the Rule of Law. That is a prime example of the arbitrary and capricious rule of man.

90 in 90 2023, Eric Sands, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 43: Principle of a Judicial Branch for Ensuring Justice Without Political Interference – Guest Essayist: Eric C. Sands, Eric Sands, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of a Judicial Branch for Ensuring Justice Without Political Interference

The lack of content in Article III, according to one of the Founders, was by design. It was a reflection on the nature of the institution and the more subservient role it played in American constitutional government. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton gave a defense of the Judiciary and argued that the Court possessed neither force nor will, but merely judgment. This made the Court the “least dangerous” branch of government and the least threatening to the Constitution. According to Hamilton, “it proves incontestably that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks.” This further adds to why the judges need lifetime tenures and such radical independence – it is the only way to ensure justice without the interference of the political branches of government or public opinion.

Benjamin Slomski, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 42: Principle of an Executive Branch, Strong but a Role Accountable to the People – Guest Essayist: Ben Slomski, Benjamin Slomski, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of an Executive Branch, Strong but a Role Accountable to the People

Government is ineffective unless its laws are obeyed and individuals will not respect the law unless there is a strong enough executive to ensure there is sufficient force behind the laws. A powerful president is of course needed to command the military and defend the nation from invasion. It is equally important to ensure that the government is well-administered and that laws are enforced consistently and effectively.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 41: Principle of a Legislative Branch Within a System of Government Closest to the People – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Principle of a Legislative Branch Within a System of Government Closest to the People

Tying government closely to the people is foundational to America. The reason America is a “federal” system, and not a “national system,” is to preserve state and local government. This assures most public policy and public activity is closest to the people it serves.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 40: Principle of Duty of the American People to Continually Maintain Checks on Government Power – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Principle of Duty of the American People to Continually Maintain Checks on Government Power

During the Virginia Ratifying Convention for the United States Constitution, Patrick Henry asserted public knowledge was the bulwark of protecting freedom, “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

“Where are your checks in this government?…The most valuable end of government is the liberty of the inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege.”

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 39: Principle of the Separation of Powers, Involving Checks and Balances on Those Powers – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

Principle of the Separation of Powers, Involving Checks and Balances on Those Powers

The United States Constitution creates a government with three separate branches, each vested with different powers and responsibilities for different functions. This particular structure reflects the doctrine of separated powers. The Framers adopted this doctrine so as to diffuse government power and thereby protect individual liberty from government encroachment. Congress possesses the authority to make laws; the President has the duty of executing those laws; and the courts interpret and apply those laws in cases brought before the judiciary.

90 in 90 2023, Adam Carrington, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 38: Principle of Free Government and Free Society – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Free Government and Free Society

We here have a basis for freedom. If the government created the people, then we would exist to serve it. But if the people establish the government, then that government must serve us. Or if one or a few had done so, the rest of us would be subject to him or to them. Our United States Constitution, which begins “We, the People,” makes clear the origin of the government’s power is from us.

90 in 90 2023, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 37: Of the People, by the People, and for the People: Founding a Representative Government in America, Not Hereditary Succession – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Of the People, by the People, and for the People: Founding a Representative Government in America, Not Hereditary Succession

He attacks hereditary succession, stating that “all men being originally equals, no one by birth, could have a right to set up his own family, in perpetual preference to all others forever.” He observes that usurpation, rather than selection by lot or by election, has been the most common method of ascension to the throne, and that original sin and hereditary succession are parallels. The then-common idea that hereditary succession preserves a nation from civil wars is quickly debunked. Monarchy and succession are a form of government leading to “blood and ashes.”

90 in 90 2023, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 36: Principle of Representative Government Under Direction of the People Rather Than King Rule – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Representative Government Under Direction of the People Rather Than King Rule

Only months later, the battles of Lexington, Concord and Bunker Hill would stir the colonists’ passions more strongly against the dictates of a King on the other side of an ocean. “No taxation without representation” reflected the colonists’ views that the time for representative government of the people rather than rule by King had come.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 35: Principle of Meritocracy and Its Importance Within the Framework of the U.S. Socio-Economic and Political Systems – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Meritocracy and Its Importance Within the Framework of the U.S. Socio-Economic and Political Systems

The Founding Fathers, including individuals such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, all demonstrated a belief in the power of individual merit. This belief was deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, a period of intellectual and philosophical development that greatly influenced their thinking. George Washington, for example, rose to prominence not because of inherited wealth or title, but due to his leadership abilities and military acumen during the Revolutionary War. He was a model of the self-made man, a figure that would become emblematic of the American Dream, and his leadership was a testament to the power of merit.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 34: Principle of Equality Over Equity – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Equality Over Equity

The Constitution of the United States, a document drafted by forward-thinking individuals who appreciated the dangers of tyranny, does not promise equal outcomes. Rather, it guarantees equal rights and opportunities. This foundational text ensures that every citizen has the same fundamental rights, echoing the Declaration, that of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Constitution is essentially silent on the matter of ensuring equal outcomes, a silence that underscores the drafters’ understanding of human nature and the importance of individual agency, meritocracy, and free market principles.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 33: Principle of Limited Government: Why the United States Constitution Is Designed To Prevent Centralized Power – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

Principle of Limited Government: Why the United States Constitution Is Designed To Prevent Centralized Power

The framers held a cautious and skeptical view toward concentrations of government power. The framers worried more about empowering a federal government that could use its power to deprive people of their liberty than about not giving that government enough powers to swiftly address any political or economic crisis that might arise. They were more concerned about a government doing something wrong than about a government with enough power to be able to always do what was right. Therefore, the scheme of limited government built into the Constitution served as a means of safeguarding liberty, since a government limited in power would be less able to exercise power in abusive or oppressive ways.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 32: Principle of Decentralized Government: Keeping Power on the Local Level With Each Individual American and the States – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Decentralized Government: Keeping Power on the Local Level With Each Individual American and the States

It is notable that the defenders of the Constitution at the time agreed that a distant government had systemic tendencies towards unresponsiveness and autocracy. They sought to blunt that criticism by defending their new “confederated republic.” As noted above, a significant part of that defense was that the general government’s powers were few and directed at truly “national” concerns which would arise in only unusual and occasional situations, whereas the states would deal with the everyday matters most directly and closely affecting the people.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 28: Principle of Law and Order Based on Immutable Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, Not Arbitrary Will or Mob Rule – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Law and Order Based on Immutable Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, Not Arbitrary Will or Mob Rule

Mob rule would be another, perhaps even more blatant, triumph of passion over reason than the arbitrary human law hastily produced by the legislature. That body had more of an opportunity to calm those passions or might at least blunt their force in the eventual statute. However, there is another side to be considered. What is mob rule?

90 in 90 2023, Eric Sands, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 27: Principle of Decision Making by the Majority Within a Constitutional Framework – Guest Essayist: Eric C. Sands, Eric Sands, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Decision Making by the Majority Within a Constitutional Framework

To men like Calhoun, and Jefferson, who would attack majority rule, Madison put the matter plain. Without majority rule, republican government was simply not possible. This made it clear that “while the Constitution is in force, the power created by it [in a popular majority] must be the legitimate power, and obeyed as the only alternative to the dissolution of all government.” Thus, it is, according to Madison, that majority rule under constitutional government is not to be preferred because it is perfect, but because it is the least imperfect.

Josh Herring, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 26: Principle of Self-Governing – Guest Essayist: Josh Herring, Josh Herring, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Self-Governing

Let us also be mindful that the cause of freedom greatly depends on the use we make of the singular opportunities we enjoy of governing ourselves wisely; for if the event should prove, that the people of this country either cannot or will not govern themselves, who will hereafter be advocates for systems, which however charming in theory and prospect, are not reducible to practice.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 25: Under Strict Limits: Principle of a Written U.S. Constitution, a Contract Allowing Government to Run Under Authority of the American People – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Under Strict Limits: Principle of a Written U.S. Constitution, a Contract Allowing Government to Run Under Authority of the American People

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner The brilliance of the United States Constitution lies not just in its innovative governance structure but in its foundational principle: that it is a written contract allowing, under strict limits, a government to run under the authority of the American people within the states. […]

Benjamin Slomski, 90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 24: Principle of a Written United States Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, Designed for the Preservation of Liberty – Guest Essayist: Ben Slomski, Benjamin Slomski, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of a Written United States Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, Designed for the Preservation of Liberty

If government’s power came from within itself, then there would be no natural limits to what government can do and no need for written restrictions. Instead, governmental power is granted by the people and a constitution serves as a specific statement of what is granted and what authority the people retain for themselves. This delegation of power must be done in an explicit, concrete act by writing it in a public document approved by the people to embody their fundamental will.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 23: Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government Upon Protection of Natural, Unchangeable, Unalienable Rights – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary Porter

Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government Upon Protection of Natural, Unchangeable, Unalienable Rights

Thomas Jefferson said it most succinctly: “to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men.” We could end this discussion right there – the “appropriate role and purpose of government” is the “security, the protection of unalienable rights,” but we all know there is more to the story.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 22: Principle of Natural Law as the Foundation for Constitutional Law – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Principle of Natural Law as the Foundation for Constitutional Law

Instead, “a revolutionary government, a thing without either principle or authority, was substituted in its place; virtue and crime depended upon accident; and that which was patriotism one day became treason the next.” Lacking a constitution that protects inherent rights causes an “avidity to punish, [which] is always dangerous to liberty. It leads men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of laws. He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 21: Human Flourishing and the Principle of Creator-Endowed Unalienable Rights – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Human Flourishing and the Principle of Creator-Endowed Unalienable Rights

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner The Declaration of Independence famously announced that all human beings not only are created equal, but are endowed by their Creator with certain “unalienable” rights. Among those rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These were, as the Declaration also held, self-evident […]

90 in 90 2023, Robert Brescia, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 19: Principle of Peace Through Strength – Guest Essayist: Robert Brescia, Robert Brescia, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Peace Through Strength

“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.” —George Washington

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 18: Preventing Loss of Independence to Foreign or Global Governments by Upholding the Principle of America’s National Sovereignty – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Preventing Loss of Independence to Foreign or Global Governments by Upholding the Principle of America’s National Sovereignty

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner The previous essay, #17, showed that, according to the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the people of the United States of America have a right, from the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” to establish their independence and thereby their national sovereignty. […]

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 17: Principle of America’s National Sovereignty – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of America’s National Sovereignty

Essay Read By Constituting America Founder Actress Janine Turner “That these are our grievances which we have thus laid before his majesty, with that freedom of language and sentiment which becomes a free people claiming their rights, as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief […]

90 in 90 2023, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 16: Principle of Citizenship and Love of Country – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Citizenship and Love of Country

Amor patriae is Latin for love of country. It is a noble concept, but what does it mean and how is it manifested? Is it done by flying a flag from your front porch on Independence Day or singing a heartfelt Star Spangled Banner at a ballgame or cheering as America wins yet another gold medal at the Olympics? It is all that but so much more.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 15: A Founding Built Against Unbridled Power: Principle of Civic Duty to Rein In Overreaching Government – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

A Founding Built Against Unbridled Power: Principle of Civic Duty to Rein In Overreaching Government

Even more popular among colonial thinkers and activists was John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government published in 1689. Locke’s Second Treatise describes the importance of a civilized society based on natural, God given, rights. It supports the social contract theory of the governed consenting to limited government in exchange for a secure and stable environment in which individual activity and commerce can thrive. It became the primary conceptual work defining traditional 18th and 19th Century Liberalism.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 14: Principle of Civic Duty to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Civic Duty to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances

So as the Constitution was being drafted, and further constraints were being placed on the power of government via the Bill of Rights, the founders included language in the First Amendment ensuring that citizens would retain a right to so petition the government when they were aggrieved—with a corresponding assurance found in the Fifth Amendment, that when such substantive petitioning is made, “due process” is accorded to the petitioner i.e., that a fair and just process is made available to the person or persons petitioning.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joseph M. Knippenberg 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 13: Principle of Civic Duty, Civic Engagement – Guest Essayist: Joseph M. Knippenberg, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joseph Knippenberg

Principle of Civic Duty, Civic Engagement

We can look to the founding generation for examples of how to take this trust seriously. First, in the Northwest Ordinance, passed by Congress under the Articles of Confederation and then repassed by Congress under the United States Constitution, we read these words: “Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” Schools don’t just train workers or create clever consumers; they are to engage in civic education, uniting morality (which as George Washington reminds us, is supported by religion) with knowledge for the sake of good government.

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 12: Educating a Free People to Secure the Blessings of Liberty for Future Generations of Americans – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Educating a Free People to Secure the Blessings of Liberty for Future Generations of Americans

As proven by the effectiveness of The New England Primer, the Worcester Speculator especially emphasized the usefulness of literature for inculcating virtue and morality in students. “If we would maintain our dear bought rights inviolate,” he wrote, “let us diffuse the spirit of literature: Then will self-interest, the governing principle of a savage heart, expand and be transferred into patriotism: Then will each member of the community consider himself as belonging to one common family, whose happiness he will ever be zealous to promote.”

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 11: Civic Virtue and a Free People: Principle of Educating on Ethical, Philosophical, Self-Evident Truths of Good Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Civic Virtue and a Free People: Principle of Educating on Ethical, Philosophical, Self-Evident Truths of Good Government

None of the founding generation appear as convinced of the importance of education and religion to virtue and of virtue to liberty preserved through republican government as Samuel’s cousin John Adams. Despite his occasional doubts and pessimism, Adams was a staunch virtue republican. His writings are filled with quotable passages about the subject. A few will give the essence of his thoughts. Perhaps his best known, expressed in a letter in October, 1798, to officers in the Massachusetts militia, is “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” This sentiment, embraced the then-common belief that the American experiment in self-government, more than aristocratic or monarchic systems, relied on virtue widely diffused among the general population, or at least among those who would have the privilege to vote or to hold public office.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 10: Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government in Protecting Liberty of the Citizenry – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Principle of Appropriate Role and Purpose of Government in Protecting Liberty of the Citizenry

Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner Since the earliest days of the American founding, a bedrock principle of our republic has been the concept that government is an essential element in protecting and preserving individual rights. In the Declaration of Independence, principal author Thomas Jefferson wrote, “to secure… rights, […]

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 09: Keeping a Free People Securely Bound Together Through the Principle of Natural Law Opposition to Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Keeping a Free People Securely Bound Together Through the Principle of Natural Law Opposition to Tyranny

“When the law is the will of the people, it will be uniform and coherent: but fluctuation, contradiction, and inconsistency of councils must be expected under those governments where every revolution in the ministry of a court produces one in the state. Such being the folly and pride of all ministers, that they ever pursue measures directly opposite to those of their predecessors…We shall neither be exposed to the necessary convulsions of elective monarchies, nor to the want of wisdom, fortitude, and virtue, to which hereditary succession is liable. In your hands it will be to perpetuate a prudent, active and just legislature, and which will never expire until you yourselves lose the virtues which give it existence…Our Union is now complete; our constitution composed, established, and approved. You are now the guardians of your own liberties.”

90 in 90 2023, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 08: Principle of Constitutional Restraints To Prevent the Undermining of Interests of the Entire Union – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Constitutional Restraints To Prevent the Undermining of Interests of the Entire Union

One of the purposes of the Constitution of the United States, according to its Preamble, is “to form a more perfect Union.” It was a long road, however, for that Union to be more perfectly established as under the Constitution in 1787. Before the Constitution, the thirteen original states had agreed to a “firm league of friendship” through a compact known as the “articles of Confederation and perpetual Union.”

90 in 90 2023, Jay McConville, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 07: Republic or Democracy? Classical History, Republican Governing as Adopted by the United States, and the American Revolutionary War – Guest Essayist: Jay McConville, Jay McConville, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Republic or Democracy? Classical History, Republican Governing as Adopted by the United States, and the American Revolutionary War

From these definitions it is clear why there might be some confusion. A representative republic uses “democratic means” to manifest the consent of the governed. We vote for representatives, who vote on measures. Voting is democracy in action, but that does not make the United States a democracy. The measures that our representatives vote on are constrained by law and the Constitution.

90 in 90 2023, Winfield H. Rose, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 06: Classical History and Governing Devoted to Freedom and Independence Through Restraining Power of Elected Representatives – Guest Essayist: Winfield Rose, Winfield H. Rose, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Classical History and Governing Devoted to Freedom and Independence Through Restraining Power of Elected Representatives

Essay Read By Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner Other impacts of the Protestant Reformation derive directly from the teachings of John Calvin (1509-1564), a Frenchman by birth who spent most of his life in Geneva, Switzerland. The distinguishing characteristic of Calvinist Protestantism, as presented in his Institutes of the Christian Religion […]

90 in 90 2023, Winfield H. Rose, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 05: Principle of Applying Lessons from Classical History toward New Governing Devoted to Freedom and Independence – Guest Essayist: Winfield Rose, Winfield H. Rose, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Principle of Applying Lessons from Classical History Toward New Governing Devoted to Freedom and Independence

These wars had two significant impacts on what was to become the United States. First, many Europeans tired of the seemingly endless slaughter and religious persecution and desired to escape, thereby emigrating to North America and populating the English colonies

90 in 90 2023, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 04: History, Order and Tradition in the Formation of America’s Founding Documents – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

History, Order and Tradition in the Formation of America’s Founding Documents

Essay Read By Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner Driving through Connecticut, you’ll see license plates with the words “Constitution State” inscribed at the bottom of the plate. But wait! Wasn’t the Constitution drafted in Pennsylvania, known as the Keystone State? And wasn’t Delaware, known as the First State, the first state to […]

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 03: Essentially Bound: The Principle of Regard for History, Order, and Tradition – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Essentially Bound: The Principle of Regard for History, Order, and Tradition

Yet the need remains for structure and stability in an orderly society, lest the relations among people devolve into a competition defined solely by power, resembling a Hobbesian state of nature of a war of all against all. The solution proposed by various “left” writers, from Rousseau to Marxist-Leninists of various stripes, of a government where the rulers embody a stylized “general will” of the collective in place of the expression of individual wills inevitably has led to dictatorship and oppression.

90 in 90 2023, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, George Landrith 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 02: Principle of Governing to Secure Liberty of the People, Not Government – Guest Essayist: George Landrith, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, George Landrith

Principle of Governing to Secure Liberty of the People, Not Government

Our Founding Fathers did not create a government or craft a constitution to serve government’s interests or even their own narrow interests. They created a government that focused on securing the liberty of the American people and that strictly limited and checked the power of the federal government. They had a great deal of experience with government that existed for the primary purpose of advancing the interests of those who already had tremendous political power.

90 in 90 2023, Adam Carrington, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 2023 - First Principles of the American Founding, 13. First Principles of the American Founding, Essay 01: Introduction: First Principles of the American Founding – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Introduction: First Principles of the American Founding

What are principles? We speak of them often in politics, history, philosophy, and other fields of study. We praise those who have them, or at least those with which we agree, and criticize those who lack them altogether. Simply put, principles articulate a standard. This standard carries a certain authority, providing a measure by which to judge thoughts, words, and deeds.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 90: Keeping the Republic: America’s Founders on the United States Constitution and Upholding Tradition, Continuity, Virtue and Stability of Good Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Keeping the Republic: America’s Founders on the United States Constitution and Upholding Tradition, Continuity, Virtue and Stability of Good Government

Many of these dysfunctions were spawned by utopian schemers who without thought or hesitation cast aside rules and institutions forged in human experience.

Blog

First Principles of the American Founding

Essay #1 – INTRODUCTION Introduction: First Principles of the American Founding by Adam M. Carrington, Associate Professor of Politics, Hillsdale College; Author, Justice Stephen Field’s Cooperative Constitution of Liberty: Liberty in Full. ~*~ Essay #2 – Principle of government exists to secure liberty of the people rather than government existing to benefit itself. “We ought […]

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 89: Failures of Utopian Creation Experiments: America’s Founders and Their Warnings Against Attempts to Reinvent Human Nature – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Failures of Utopian Creation Experiments: America’s Founders and Their Warnings Against Attempts to Reinvent Human Nature

To paraphrase Hamilton from The Federalist No. 6, though it is reasonable for us to aim at progress through prudent change and experimentation, one must be far gone in Utopian speculations to believe that human beings can ever achieve a completely perfect society. History has vindicated the Founders’ advice on this through many examples of Utopian experiments that have resulted in tyranny, oppression, and death for many people.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 88: America’s Founding Knowledge of Failed Utopian Ideologies: Establishing a U.S. Constitution Based on Tradition and Natural Rights to Prevent Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

America’s Founding Knowledge of Failed Utopian Ideologies: Establishing a U.S. Constitution Based on Tradition and Natural Rights to Prevent Tyranny

A large utopian society, whose members are not bound together by religion or by rules derived from long-established customs which reflect the traditional ordering within stable communities, requires increasingly brutal force to maintain commitment to the utopian project. Pol Pot’s devilish regime in Cambodia nearly half a century ago is a notorious example of this, as memorialized in the chilling movie The Killing Fields.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 87: Trade and American Independence: Establishing a United States Constitution for Lasting Political and Economic Freedom – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Trade and American Independence: Establishing a United States Constitution for Lasting Political and Economic Freedom

After the revolution, the Founders made strategic choices that affected the international trade practices that the new nation would follow. Tariffs and trade restrictions were still permissible, but procedural constraints limited their use. Within the United States Constitution, the Founders established a particular process by which taxes, including tariffs, would be enacted.

90 in 90 2022, Jay McConville, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 86: Prescience on Decline of the British Empire in Brutus No. VIII: Warnings That Influenced Formation of the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Jay McConville, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Jay McConville, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Prescience on Decline of the British Empire in Brutus No. VIII: Warnings That Influenced Formation of the United States Constitution

Germane to these questions then, are the enumerated powers that give the national government the ability to raise, borrow, and spend money, and specifically to maintain standing military forces. Brutus warned that these unlimited powers threatened the economic future of the country and the sovereignty of the people.

Thomas Bruscino, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 85: Empire for Liberty: The American Founders on Curbing International Domination and Overreach – Guest Essayist: Thomas Bruscino, Thomas Bruscino, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Empire for Liberty: The American Founders on Curbing International Domination and Overreach

The power and influence of the United States in the world has always strived to be something different. Whatever else that can be said about American expansion and intervention overseas, and there is plenty of room for critique, it has most often been constrained by Americans themselves. Whether through idealistic objectives set by governments in power, contentious domestic politics, or the vocal opposition of small minorities or brave lone voices, the United States has never expanded or intervened without the reminder that such activities threaten the soul of America itself. “She might become the dictatress of the world,” John Quincy Adams said in his famous address on July 4, 1821, but “She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 84: Guarding American Sovereignty: The United States Constitution and Its Protections Against World Government Control – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Guarding American Sovereignty: The United States Constitution and Its Protections Against World Government Control

This is due, in no small measure, to the United States Constitution’s mandates about the Senate’s advise and consent role in terms of treaty ratification—if the foreign relations team of a U.S. president were to fail at their job or to be seriously compromised in some measure in terms of international negotiation, and as a result the U.S. were to give up a great deal of its independence, its sovereignty, it is left to the Senate to ensure that the interests of the people of the United States are protected, and that the agreement should not be ratified…In terms of the relationship between the United States and the United Nations, the obligations of the U.S. are not entirely different than any other treaty-governed relationship that the U.S. may be obligated to. The issues of sovereignty and compromise remain the same—and the relationship between the executive branch and the legislative branch in terms of the power to negotiate and the power to ratify are maintained. But, as always, it remains left to the people to ensure that both branches protect the interests of the American people in the long term.

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 83: United States Independence and Sovereignty: Cautions From America’s Founders Against Relinquishing Policy Decisions to International Organizations – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

United States Independence and Sovereignty: Cautions From America’s Founders Against Relinquishing Policy Decisions to International Organizations

Because the American people have granted these powers, they have entrusted the American government with the responsibility of dealing with foreign policy issues for the security of our rights. According to the U.S. Constitution, however, the American people did not authorize our government to “delegate” that responsibility or those powers to another governing body, including international organizations – especially ones comprised of nations that abhor the very principles of justice for which the United States stands.

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 82: International Regimes, Events Leading To Creation of the United Nations, and Involvement of the United States – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

International Regimes, Events Leading To Creation of the United Nations, and Involvement of the United States

In the aftermath of World War I, the League of Nations was finally established with the lofty goal of preserving world peace. In reality, its purpose was to bring together the “democratic” (i.e., “civilized” or “historically advanced”) nations to work together regarding territorial disputes and colonial possessions through negotiation rather than resorting to war. However, the United States Senate rejected membership in the League of Nations on the grounds that it would strip our nation of some degree of its domestic sovereignty and its independence in choosing foreign policy actions.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, David B. Kopel 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 81: The United States Constitution vs the Regime of Mao Zedong: Opposite Systems of Government – Guest Essayist: David B. Kopel, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, David B. Kopel

The United States Constitution vs. the Regime of Mao Zedong: Opposite Systems of Government

Under the U.S. Constitution, the three branches of government check and balance each other, as power is set against power. In a communist regime, there are no checks on the party’s will. All political power belongs to the party. Under Mao, “at the top, thirty to forty men made all the major decisions. Their power was personal, fluid, and dependent on their relations with Mao.”

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 80: Barriers Against Encroachments on Individual Natural Rights of Life, Liberty and Property: America’s Founders and a Well-constructed Constitution – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Barriers Against Encroachments on Individual Natural Rights of Life, Liberty and Property: America’s Founders and a Well-constructed Constitution

Anti-federalists and Federalists understood that one of the best means for preventing abuses of natural rights is to find a way to prevent all political power from being held in the same hands. As Brutus wrote, “When great and extraordinary powers are vested in any man, or body of men, which in their exercise, may operate to the oppression of the people, it is of high importance that powerful checks should be formed to prevent the abuse of it.

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 79: Enemies of Freedom: Mao Zedong and the 1966 Cultural Revolution in China – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Enemies of Freedom: Mao Zedong and the 1966 Cultural Revolution in China

The terrible abuses of natural rights during Mao’s “Cultural Revolution” remind us of the importance of the United States Constitution, which explicitly guarantees the due process of law before anyone can be deprived of life, liberty, or property. The Constitution also enshrines the fundamental idea of individual freedom, perhaps most importantly in the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberty.

90 in 90 2022, Jeanne McKinney, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 78: The United States Constitution as a Bulwark Against Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Jeanne McKinney, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Jeanne McKinney, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

The United States Constitution as a Bulwark Against Tyranny

Freedom can only exist in a framework of laws that supports it. The Constitution, if followed, will continue to prove itself on the world stage to survive the attacks of tyranny, which continue to threaten.

90 in 90 2022, Winfield H. Rose, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 77: U.S. Constitution vs. the Evil of Nazi-style Regimes: Design of America’s Founding Political System for Maintaining Independence and Self-governance – Guest Essayist: Winfield H. Rose, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Winfield H. Rose, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

U.S. Constitution vs. the Evil of Nazi-style Regimes: Design of America’s Founding Political System for Maintaining Independence and Self-governance

The American people were substantially alienated from their administration in office but not from their entire political system. It was, however, on trial. There was no guarantee it would survive.

90 in 90 2022, Winfield H. Rose, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 76: Hitler’s Evil Path to Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Winfield H. Rose, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Winfield H. Rose, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Hitler’s Evil Path to Tyranny

Inflation was severe. It was said that, before the war, you took your money to shop in a purse and brought your goods home in a wagon but, after the war, you took your money in a wagon and brought your goods home in a purse.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 75: New Deal and the Great Society: Warnings From America’s Founders on Constitutional Misconstruction – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

New Deal and the Great Society: Warnings From America’s Founders on Constitutional Misconstruction

It has been urged and echoed, that the power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,’’ amounts to an unlimited commission to exercise every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense or general welfare. No stronger proof could be given of the distress under which these writers labor for objections, than their stooping to such a misconstruction. Had no other enumeration or definition of the powers of the Congress been found in the Constitution, than the general expressions just cited, the authors of the objection might have had some color for it; though it would have been difficult to find a reason for so awkward a form of describing an authority to legislate in all possible cases.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Patrick Garry 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 74: The Constitutional Wisdom Ignored by the New Deal and Great Society – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry

The Constitutional Wisdom Ignored by the New Deal and Great Society

Numerous economic downturns and crises plagued America during the first one hundred fifty years of its existence. The nineteenth century witnessed repeated depressions. Undoubtedly, the Great Depression of the 1930s amounted to the most severe economic crisis ever experienced in the United States. As with all previous crises, however, the country recovered from the Great […]

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 73: Economic Depression, New Deal, and the Great Society: America’s Founders on Separation of Powers to Restrain Unelected Administrative Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Economic Depression, New Deal, and the Great Society: America’s Founders on Separation of Powers to Restrain Unelected Administrative Tyranny

All of this constitutional analysis should remind us that an unofficial fourth branch of government—the administrative state, or simply, the bureaucracy—amassed an incredible amount of regulatory power throughout the course of the twentieth century and into this century. Indeed, if one were to examine a chart of all the regulatory agencies, it would be hard to find an area of American daily life that is not regulated in dozens of ways throughout the day. The reason for the regulatory agencies makes a certain amount of sense in an advanced industrial society and economy. All Americans want to fly in safe airplanes, drink clean water, and know what they are eating…The rise of the bureaucratic administrative state was problematic for a number of reasons. First, it dramatically increased the scale and scope of federal government well beyond that envisioned by the Founders. Second, it substituted rule by the people and their representatives in Congress for rule by unelected experts in the executive branches. Third, at times, administrative agencies were allowed to set their own rules, enforce them, and decide and rule on disputes thereby amassing the power of all three branches of government.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 72: Barriers to Dismantling Constitutionalism: America’s Founders and Their Safeguards Designed in the United States Constitution Against Progressivism – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Barriers to Dismantling Constitutionalism: America’s Founders and Their Safeguards Designed in the United States Constitution Against Progressivism

Collectivism/Cooperation. Progressivism holds to a diminished view of individualism and private property, replaced by the need for everyone to cooperate to achieve progressive goals, to include forced “cooperation” if necessary.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 71: The United States Constitution and Institutional Framework for Executive Firmness – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, William Morrisey PhD

The United States Constitution and Institutional Framework for Executive Firmness

Publius’ understanding of the presidency not only departs from the conception of executive power which prevailed under the Articles, it also contradicts the new conception of the presidency advanced by the Progressives, more than a century later. President Woodrow Wilson rejected the United States Constitution as an antiquated and constricting product of a bygone era, and equally rejected its moral foundation in the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God. In place of natural right, he substituted historical right.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 70: Power Concentrated in the Hands of a Few: Conflict of Progressive Government Toward American Individualism and the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Power Concentrated in the Hands of a Few: Conflict of Progressive Government Toward American Individualism and the United States Constitution

At the 1896 Democratic Party convention in Chicago, a former Congressman from Nebraska, William Jennings Bryan, gave a stirring oration in favor of the party’s “pro-silver” political platform. Filled with passion and a near-revolutionary fire, the speech concluded with a warning to those who wanted the United States to maintain a gold standard for the dollar, “You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns; you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.” Bryan underscored this patently religious analogy by posing at its conclusion with his arms outstretched like someone nailed to a cross. The convention erupted in pandemonium. The ecstatic reaction of the delegates resulted in the “Boy Orator of the Platte River” receiving the party’s nomination for president of the United States at age 36, the youngest major party nominee ever. He became the Democrats’ presidential standard bearer twice more, in 1900 and 1908, again the only major party nominee to do so. He lost each time.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 69: United States Constitutional System and Armed Forces: Decentralized Power and Due Process vs. Stalin’s Centralized Control by Military – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

United States Constitutional System and Armed Forces: Decentralized Power and Due Process vs. Stalin’s Centralized Control by Military

We approach governance from the perspective that rights are naturally occurring in man and that power flows from the citizenry to the government, whose powers are carefully enumerated and tightly constrained. These other systems believe that government grants rights to their citizens, and that absent action by that citizenry, it is assumed that the government retains all power to act. There were no checks on power in Stalin’s USSR—millions died or suffered as a result of it.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 68: From Liberty To Suppressed Dissent: Founders on Empowered Armed Forces While Preventing a Stalin-type Military Regime in America – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

From Liberty To Suppressed Dissent: Founders on Empowered Armed Forces While Preventing a Stalin-type Military Regime in America

The Founders were rightly skeptical of what could happen when government power was not hemmed in by lawful constraints—and what happens when people are not able to debate and exercise true dissent. The warnings debated in the Federalist Papers were made manifest in the brutality of the Soviet Union’s Stalinist era and, frankly, through the oppressions of Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev, and other socialist leaders.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Eric Wise 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 67: Founding Tradition of U.S. Armed Forces Protecting Liberty and Prosperity vs. Joseph Stalin’s Military Regime – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Eric Wise

Founding Tradition of U.S. Armed Forces Protecting Liberty and Prosperity vs. Joseph Stalin’s Military Regime

The Red Army from the time of its formation through its incarnation as the Soviet Army and to the time of its collapse was forever fighting wars. From 1917 to 1922 the Red Army fought numerous civil wars for Soviet dominance of Russia, as well as the Polish-Soviet War to mop up the residual Polish state following the First World War.

Stephen Tootle, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 66: Founding Guard Against an Unchecked American Executive: World War I and Constraints by the U.S. Constitution on Presidential Powers – Guest Essayist: Stephen Tootle, Stephen Tootle, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Founding Guard Against an Unchecked American Executive: World War I and Constraints by the U.S. Constitution on Presidential Powers

Although the executive branch has broad authority in foreign policy and during wartime, its powers are not limitless. Those constitutional limits became even more important when a war was global in scope and America had a President who resisted them.

Thomas Bruscino, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 65: Foresight on Consequences of World War I: America’s Founding Proposal for a Constitution To Unite the States – Guest Essayist: Thomas Bruscino, Thomas Bruscino, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Foresight on Consequences of World War I: America’s Founding Proposal for a Constitution To Unite the States

Federalist Papers 6 and 7 are at first glance an odd place to go when it comes to explaining the onset of World War I. Their topic is the threat of internal war among the states absent the adoption of the unified federal republic in the Constitution. But the fundamental principles expressed, especially that the “causes of hostility among nations are innumerable,” will resonate with generations of World War I students who have tried to catalogue the many causes of the Great War.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 64: World War I and Commercial Rivalries: The American Founders on Solving Trade Disputes Threatening the Union – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

World War I and Commercial Rivalries: The American Founders on Solving Trade Disputes Threatening the Union

Supporters of the proposed United States Constitution of 1787 frequently warned that there was no mechanism under the Articles of Confederation to prevent what they saw as the inevitable commercial rivalries between the states from escalating into armed conflict. Such rivalries had begun to appear through protectionist trade laws enacted by various states. Another event was the dispute between Virginia and Maryland over fishing and navigation in Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac River. The end, the Federalists charged, would surely be the dissolution of the union into some number of quarreling confederations.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Sam Postell 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 63: Constitution Framers, the American Civil War, and Preserving the Union Through Compromise, Virtue and Statesmanship – Guest Essayist: Samuel Postell, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Sam Postell

Constitution Framers, the American Civil War, and Preserving the Union Through Compromise, Virtue and Statesmanship

Despite the philosophic differences, it is clear that as Congress lost the ability to collapse differences through virtue and statesmanship, and promote union through compromise, the union was destined to dissolve. The framers admitted that this was the case; that representative self-government relied upon a functional representative branch of government that protected and advanced the interests of citizens. Is our Congress capable of compromise, statesmanship, and advancing our common interests today? Perhaps the tools that quelled disunion throughout the Antebellum period could help solve our congressional crisis today.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Sam Postell 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 62: Key to Subverting the Violence of Faction: America’s Founding Design of the United States Constitution Against Disunion – Guest Essayist: Samuel Postell, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Sam Postell

Key to Subverting the Violence of Faction: America’s Founding Design of the United States Constitution Against Disunion

In his First Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln argued that “the Union is much older than the Constitution.” What did Lincoln mean when he spoke of the Union? The Declaration of Independence explains that the Americans were “one people” because they were providentially, philosophically, and hence politically united. In addition to referring to the Americans as one people, it also references the American people using the collective “We.” Furthermore, the document calls itself a “unanimous” declaration of the “united” States of America. The authors saw the separate colonies as previously united, and unanimity implied that they were “of one mind.” In short, the Declaration expressed that the Americans were one people capable of governing themselves. Because the Americans were united as one people and were arbitrarily ruled by another, the Declaration asserts that they have a duty to assert their independence by appealing to their Creator and natural laws of justice. Therefore, the principle of union, the rallying cry of Abraham Lincoln, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, and George Washington, is one of the bedrock principles of the American founding.

Eric Sands, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 61: The American Civil War and Consequences of Secession: Defining the Union, Role of the People and the States – Guest Essayist: Eric Sands, Eric Sands, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

The American Civil War and Consequences of Secession: Defining the Union, Role of the People and the States

Lincoln reinforces these points in his Message to Congress in Special Session. He calls secession “sugar-coated rebellion” and denies any revolutionary character to it. Instead, it is a “sophism” deriving its “currency from the assumption that there is some omnipotent and sacred supremacy pertaining to a State – to each State of our Federal Union. Our States have neither more nor less power than that reserved to them in the Union by the Constitution, no one of them ever having been a State out of the Union.” The original thirteen became a Union before completing their separation from Great Britain. And the others came into the union from a condition of dependence. Thus, the reverence given to “states” is based on mist and shadows and does not match this history of the American regime. In short, the states only possess those powers granted to them by the Constitution, and this does not include the power of secession.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 60: Property Ownership and Political Stability: The U.S. Constitution’s Design to Secure Individual Rights the Communist Manifesto Abolishes – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Property Ownership and Political Stability: The U.S. Constitution’s Design to Secure Individual Rights the Communist Manifesto Abolishes

Bound up in Marx’s 1875 statement is the essence of force and coercion. Regardless of whether it is the “state” acting (and in Marxist philosophy, the state-centered transition phase between capitalism and communism is “socialism”), or the communistic society, you’re talking about force—the state determines what your “abilities” are, and you are forced to give of those abilities to society at large, regardless of your own feelings in the matter.

90 in 90 2022, Jay McConville, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 59: Contrasting Visions: The United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution vs the Communist Manifesto – Guest Essayist: Jay McConville, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Jay McConville, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Contrasting Visions: The United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution vs the Communist Manifesto

Inspired and enabled by the Communist Manifesto, these regimes destroyed societies in a quest of a property-free utopia that was unachievable. In so doing they imprisoned, tortured, banished, and killed over a hundred million of their own citizens, while foisting war and chaos on the world. Thirty years after the fall the Soviet Union, “millions of people worldwide — one-fifth of the world’s population — still live under communist tyranny. It has become somewhat fashionable to say that communism, or “socialism,” is a good idea (or theory) that could work if we just implemented it correctly. The Communist Manifesto gives lie to that claim. The vision is destruction, the mission tyranny. The result predictable. How many more need to die before we finally accept this fact?

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 58: Avoiding the Dustbin of History: Failures of Communism and America’s Constitutional Foresight on Human Nature, Self-governance, and Civil Society – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Avoiding the Dustbin of History: Failures of Communism and America’s Constitutional Foresight on Human Nature, Self-governance, and Civil Society

Communism was responsible for an estimated 100 million deaths. It suppressed human flourishing in the arts and sciences by extinguishing liberty, created widespread suffering with decrepit economic systems, imposed crushing police states, and destroyed the institutions of civil society. Most of the American founders understood that such utopian schemes were doomed by their flawed understanding of human nature, self-governance, and civil society. The American founding vision built a constitutional order with self-governance and a healthy civil society that allowed individuals to thrive.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 57: Folly of a Dictatorship Led by a Single Tyrant: The Undoing of Napoleon Bonaparte vs America’s Constitutionally Constrained Executive – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Folly of a Dictatorship Led by a Single Tyrant: The Undoing of Napoleon Bonaparte vs America’s Constitutionally Constrained Executive

Napoleon was not curbed by constitutional constraints upon his executive power. He suppressed the critical press and created his own propaganda machine. The emperor was able to use his military to crush internal dissent, stop brigandage, and thwart foreign invasions. Unconstrained by prior legal limitations on his conduct, the emperor designed his own legal system, the Code Napoleon, and imposed it upon his own nation. Ultimately, Napoleon’s own limitless ambition led to his undoing, but not until thousands had died in his pursuit of conquest.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 56: Napoleon Bonaparte, the French Revolution, and America’s Protection of the Newly Formed United States Against Tyranny – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Napoleon Bonaparte, the French Revolution, and America’s Protection of the Newly Formed United States Against Tyranny

As first consul, the directors eventually chose a young, military hero who had managed to lead French armies to victory despite a depleted officer corps and a mass of enlisted soldiers who were recruited through a very unpopular conscription process. This person’s name was Napoleon Bonaparte. He was initially named consul, but soon made clear that he wished to exceed his constitutional limits. By 1804, Napoleon was named emperor by several government agencies and subsequently was approved as emperor in a national plebiscite. Napoleon was to wield more concentrated power than any extant monarch in the world. His rise to power demonstrates both the failure of France’s constitutional design and its commitment to enforce constitutional provisions.

Adam Carrington, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 55: Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and America’s Rejection of One-man Rule – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and America’s Rejection of One-man Rule

It would do so less by trying to remake human beings, something the Founders thought impossible and itself a temptation to exercise too much corrupting power. Instead, they hoped that they could channel human ambition, human love for power, in ways that offset one another. The branches would exercise checks and balances on their sister institutions. If one person or group gained too much authority, the others possessed means to keep us from falling into rule by one man or one group of persons.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 54: American Founding Observations of the French Revolution That Influenced the United States Constitution and Governing – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

American Founding Observations of the French Revolution That Influenced the United States Constitution and Governing

More fundamentally, the desired objectives were different in the two revolutions, and that in turn contributed to the ways in which the American Constitution contained provisions to address. The French focused on replacing or changing the existing government. The Americans, on the other hand, wanted to break away and form a government removed from Great Britain. With that in mind, starting with the Declaration of Independence, through the Revolutionary War, and culminating in the Constitution in 1787, the founding fathers inserted wisdom into the form of government and the United States Constitution to help prevent failures they observed in French government.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Eric Wise 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 53: Ou La Mort or Deliberation: The French Revolution and the American Revolution – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Eric Wise

Ou La Mort or Deliberation: The French Revolution and the American Revolution

When Benjamin Franklin identified the new form as “a republic, if you can keep it” he implied that the continual fostering and renewal of the habits of deliberative government was the spirit of the American Revolution and the essential ingredient for the continued success of the United States.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 52: American Revolution Principles of Natural Rights Republicanism and Constitutionalism vs the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

American Revolution Principles of Natural Rights Republicanism and Constitutionalism vs the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror

The American Founders’ thinking about human nature and government was guided by differing strains of thought from ancient philosophy, the English tradition, the British Enlightenment, and Protestant Christianity. As a result, they developed a realistic understanding of vice and virtue, sin and goodness. As James Madison wrote in Federalist #51, “What is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”

Andrea Criswell, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 51: Upon a Need of Virtue to Self-govern: Penning a United States Constitution for a Free and Independent Nation – Guest Essayist: Andrea Criswell, Andrea Criswell, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Upon a Need of Virtue to Self-govern: Penning a United States Constitution for a Free and Independent Nation

“It is a great mistake to suppose that the paper we prepare will govern the United States. It is the men whom it will bring into the government and interest in maintaining it that is to govern them. The paper will only mark out the mode and the form. Men are the substance and must do the business.” -John Francis Mercer

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 50: Keeping a Republic: America’s Founders on the Role of Public and Private Virtue – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Keeping a Republic: America’s Founders on the Role of Public and Private Virtue

“A people may prefer a free government; but if from indolence, or carelessness, or cowardice, or want of public spirit, they are unequal to the exertions necessary for preserving it; if they will not fight for it when directly attacked; …they are more or less unfit for liberty.” John Stuart Mill

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 49: America’s Founders on Virtue as Fundamental to Republican Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

America’s Founders on Virtue as Fundamental to Republican Government

John Adams’s major work on constitutional government and republicanism was A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America, a treatise on the emerging American constitutionalism with its emphasis on checks and balances of governmental powers. But Adams was also a prolific writer of letters to numerous correspondents. Many years before he wrote in his 1798 response to the Massachusetts militia, “Our government was made only for a moral and religious people,” he wrote to the chronicler of the period Mercy Otis Warren that republican government could survive only if the people were conditioned “by pure Religion or Austere Morals. Public Virtue cannot exist in a Nation without private, and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics.” Sounding the theme of positive classic republicanism, he continued, “There must be a positive Passion for the public good, the public Interest, Honor, Power, and Glory, established in the Minds of the People, or there can be no Republican Government, nor any real liberty.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 48: The United States Constitution as a Bill of Rights – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary Porter

The United States Constitution as a Bill of Rights

Where is the explicit protection of speech, or religion, of conscience, of the right to keep and bear arms, etc.? Hamilton’s answer of course would be: “where is the government given power in the Constitution to intrude upon any of those rights? The weight of Hamilton’s and Madison’s argument must rest then on the Constitution actually being, and, more importantly, remaining, a limited powers document. It is quite clear from the journals of early Congresses that congressmen routinely considered the Constitution to limit the powers of government.

Eric Sands, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 47: Indispensable Contents of a Bill of Rights for the United States Constitution: Federalist and Anti-federalist Perspectives – Guest Essayist: Eric Sands, Eric Sands, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Indispensable Contents of a Bill of Rights for the United States Constitution: Federalist and Anti-federalist Perspectives

Federalists initially countered these arguments in a couple of ways. In Federalist 84, for example, Hamilton argued that the Constitution should be allowed a trial period before alterations were made. There may be several things the American people want to change five or ten years down the road, so make the changes then when a judgment can be made about whether they are necessary. Second, the structure and design of the Constitution already protected rights through separation of powers, checks and balances, enumerated powers, and republicanism. Any attempt to infringe on personal rights would never be able to survive this gauntlet of obstructions. Finally, a bill of rights could endanger rights because it would only include certain specified rights, leaving others unprotected. It would also imply that rights come from government and that it alone chooses which rights to recognize.

90 in 90 2022, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 46: Purpose for a Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Purpose for a Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution

The challenge now was to craft a bill of rights that would be acceptable to the thirteen states. James Madison of Virginia, an early opponent of a bill of rights and a member of the House of Representatives, eventually changed his position on the matter and led the effort to develop one that would satisfy the Anti-federalists.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 45: Toward a More Perfect Union: Correcting the Articles of Confederation Through the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Toward a More Perfect Union: Correcting the Articles of Confederation Through the United States Constitution

All but the last of the twelve “bullet points” Madison set down in “Vices” were accompanied by elaborating commentary. For instance: “Failure of the States to comply with the Constitutional requisitions,” the first complaint, was explained as an “evil” which “has been so fully experienced both during the war and since the peace, [which] results so naturally from the number and independent authority of the States and has been so uniformly exemplified in every similar Confederacy, that it may be considered as not less radically and permanently inherent in, than it is fatal to the object of, the present System.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 44: Articles of Confederation, Designing a United States Constitution, and Empowering a National Government While Preventing a Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Articles of Confederation, Designing a United States Constitution, and Empowering a National Government While Preventing a Tyranny

James Madison was one of the leading voices of the Federalists who propagated this new view. Before the Convention, Madison penned the Vices of the Political System, which detailed the evils that beset the Confederation. He thought, “The great desideratum in Government is such a modification of the sovereignty as will render it sufficiently neutral between the different interests and factions to control one part of the Society from invading the rights of another, and, at the same time, sufficiently controlled itself from setting up an interest adverse to that of the whole society.” In other words, the main goal was to empower the national government without creating a tyranny.

90 in 90 2022, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 43: From the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union to a United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

From the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union to a United States Constitution

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was our nation’s first constitution and essentially served as the basis for our government from 1777 to 1789. It was created by the thirteen original states to help them unify their war efforts against England and was the precursor to our present Constitution.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 42: Laboring Over Ingredients for Good Government: America’s Founding Generation on Drafting Early State Constitutions – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary Porter

Laboring Over Ingredients for Good Government: America’s Founding Generation on Drafting Early State Constitutions

So far from intending each of the three branches to be wholly coordinate, they decided to curb any excess of power in any one branch by balancing it with an effective power in another. Where they had experienced an evil in an omnipotent Legislature, they checked it; where they had actually felt the oppression of a too strong Executive, they checked him; where they believed a Court had been too independent, they checked it.”

Adam Carrington, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 41: Successful Government and Forming State Constitutions on All Political Power Being Vested in and Derived From the People Only – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Successful Government and Forming State Constitutions on All Political Power Being Vested in and Derived From the People Only

Second, these constitutions in general got the purpose of government right. Massachusetts’ constitution (1780), penned by John Adams, said the purpose of government resided in the power “to furnish the individuals who compose it with the power of enjoying, in safety and tranquillity, their natural rights and the blessings of life.” This reasoning, too, aligned with the Declaration of Independence. It declared that all human beings possessed “unalienable rights,” meaning claims on others that no one else could infringe. It then said that “to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 40: Framing Early State Constitutions and Developing a Republican Form of Government, Under Threat of Battle – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Framing Early State Constitutions and Developing a Republican Form of Government, Under Threat of Battle

Many of those early state constitutions were hastily drafted under adverse conditions. The threat of approaching British troops forced some constitutional conventions to adjourn and reconvene multiple times. Some states’ constitutional framers were not completely convinced that the revolution would be successful. According to Article 26 of New Jersey’s constitution of 1776, “if Reconciliation between Great Britain and these Colonies should take place, and the latter be again taken under the Protection and Government of the Crown of Great Britain, this Charter shall be null and void, otherwise to remain firm and inviolable.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 39: Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God: Preserving the Purpose of the Declaration of Independence Through the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God: Preserving the Purpose of the Declaration of Independence Through the United States Constitution

In 1861, President Abraham Lincoln had occasion to reflect upon the principles of the American Founding. Using a biblical metaphor, he thought that the Declaration of Independence was an “apple of gold” because it contained the foundational principles of the new country. The Constitution was the “picture of silver” framing the apple with the structures of republican government, thus preserving the purpose of the Declaration. In the mind of Lincoln—and those of the Founders—an inextricable link bound together the two documents in creating a free government.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Eric Wise 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 38: From a Declaration of Independence to a Constitution: The Laws of Nature and Preservation of the United States of America – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Eric Wise

From a Declaration of Independence to a Constitution: The Laws of Nature and Preservation of the United States of America

The Federalists prevailed, but experience has at times exposed weaknesses in the Federalist’s arguments. The federal government has overtime supplanted the states in their power. Appeals to the people to amend their Constitution have not just become infrequent, but have ceased almost altogether: The Constitution has not been amended “soup to nuts” in more than 50 years. And this has happened as the judicial power has expanded under the doctrine of a “living constitution” to displace the amendment function; this raises the question whether the Constitution can continue to be the people’s document if the courts, and not they, are its author in key respects.

90 in 90 2022, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 37: Where No Government Had Gone Before: The Enduring Success of America’s Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Where No Government Had Gone Before: The Enduring Success of America’s Declaration of Independence

The words contained in the Declaration of Independence were some of the most revolutionary ideas ever printed. When Congress approved the words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness,” they were going where no government had gone before.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 36: The U.S. Constitution on Managing British Colonial Governance in North America and Careful Admission of New States to the Union – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

The U.S. Constitution on Managing British Colonial Governance in North America and Careful Admission of New States to the Union

The British government had both successes and failures when it came to their management of the North American colonies. The authors of the Constitution learned from those mistakes and crafted clear language to safeguard against making them again.

90 in 90 2022, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 35: Virginia’s House of Burgesses, Rights of the British Colonies, and Establishing Representative Governing in America – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Virginia’s House of Burgesses, Rights of the British Colonies, and Establishing Representative Governing in America

In its day, many of the men who assembled there later assembled on the national stage to lead our country. Throughout the crisis with England, it was an eloquent and vocal proponent for American liberty and many of the ideas found in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution were first debated and refined in their meetings.

90 in 90 2022, Tom Hand, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 34: Royal, Self-governing, and Proprietary Colonies: Advancing From British Rule Toward American Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Tom Hand, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Royal, Self-governing, and Proprietary Colonies: Advancing From British Rule Toward American Independence

Like the entrepreneurs of today, a few men came up with an idea, presented it to their friends and associates, and asked them to invest in their plan. Their organizations had wide latitude to appoint leaders and run their business as they wished. Virginia, Massachusetts Bay, Connecticut, and Rhode Island were all initially established as self-governing colonies. However, these colonies soon found out that their independence was on a short leash. If the colony was poorly administered like in Virginia or if the people proved troublesome like in Massachusetts, these dominions were converted into a royal colony with all the restrictions that came with it. By the time of the American Revolution, only Rhode Island and Connecticut, retained their original self-governing charter. The King always had the final say.

Adam Carrington, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 33: Building America’s Political House on Solid Ground: Foundations of Faith, Plymouth Rock and the Mayflower Compact – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Building America’s Political House on Solid Ground: Foundations of Faith, Plymouth Rock and the Mayflower Compact

Its true foundation rested on those commitments—human equality and liberty—as understood through the laws of nature and of nature’s God. Those principles still hold out the promise of provision, provision of a strong foundation against all storms, internal or external. It does; but only if we continue to build wisely and faithfully upon it.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 32: “City Upon a Hill” and the Mayflower Compact: Forming a Constitutional Republic Sustained Through Civic Virtue, Natural Rights and Liberty – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

“City Upon a Hill” and the Mayflower Compact: Forming a Constitutional Republic Sustained Through Civic Virtue, Natural Rights and Liberty

The concept of a “city upon a hill” originated with Massachusetts Bay Colony Governor John Winthrop’s “Model of Christian Charity” sermon aboard the Arbella. He described the purpose of establishing a godly society to work towards the common good, just government, and civic virtue. Winthrop’s thinking about a “city upon a hill” was influenced by covenant theology: “We must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people are upon us; so that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world.” The same ideals about a religious and civil covenant with God and each other were present in the Pilgrims’ “Mayflower Compact.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 31: Consent of the Self-governed: Mayﬂower Compact and the City of God on Earth – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Consent of the Self-governed: Mayﬂower Compact and the City of God on Earth

The singular importance of the Mayflower Compact was in the foundation it provided for a theory of organic generation of a government legitimized by the consent of the governed. Self-government became realized through a contract among and for those to be governed.

Adam Carrington, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 30: King and Parliament in 17th Century England vs. a Self-governing People and President in the U.S. Constitution – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

King and Parliament in 17th Century England vs. a Self-governing People and President in the U.S. Constitution

But our presidents do take some role in religious expression. George Washington’s Farewell Address warned of the need for religious belief among the people. That belief would shore up national morality among the ultimate human rulers, We the People. It would aid in public and private happiness, in the ruling of self that is a prerequisite to running a popular government. Moreover, since Washington, most presidents have published proclamations or given speeches that thank or make requests of God. John Adams warned in 1798 that our Constitution was made for a religious people and the need to cultivate those beliefs, consistent with human liberty. Perhaps the greatest speech ever given on American soil, Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural, consisted of an extended meditation on God’s will in the American Civil War and an affirmation of God’s goodness in the midst of so much hardship and bloodshed.

Adam Carrington, 90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 29: Parliament in 17th Century England and Why America Does Not Have a King – Guest Essayist: Adam Carrington, Adam Carrington, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Parliament in 17th Century England and Why America Does Not Have a King

Americans intentionally divided power among its political institutions in a way different from that which enveloped the English in the 17th century. They did not divide by who ruled, since the people ruled entirely. They divided by governmental function. They divided these functions and thus institutions into three, not England’s two: a Congress to make laws, a president to enforce them, and a judicial system to decide disputes based on the law. This separation of powers has proven far more consistent and effective over its history.

90 in 90 2022, Jay McConville, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Jay McConville, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists

Memorial Day – A Day of Remembrance Written in the Hearts of the American People

America is the great nation that it is because we revere and honor the memory of brave souls who gave their lives to preserve it. Let the memory and sacrifices of those who have come before, for liberty purchased at such an immeasurable price for future generations, be forever written in our hearts. “Whether we […]

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 28: King vs. Parliament in 17th Century England: From Absolutism to Constitutional Monarchy, Influence on American Governing – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

King vs. Parliament in 17th Century England: From Absolutism to Constitutional Monarchy, Influence on American Governing

It is an axiom of politics that politicians will seek first to protect their privileges and second to expand them. The increased demands by parliamentarians for political power inevitably clashed with the monarchs’ hereditary claims. Both sides appealed to traditional English constitutional custom for legitimacy. With their assumptions about the source of political authority utterly at odds, compromise became increasingly complex and fleeting. It was treating a gangrenous infection with a band-aid. Radical surgery became the way out. The American Revolution in the following century, and even the American Civil War of the century thereafter, showed evidence of a similar progression, with the two sides operating from fundamentally contradictory views of the nature of representative government and proper division of power between the general government and its constituent parts.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 27: U.S. Constitution’s Presidential Limits: The Framers’ Opposition To King Louis XIV “I Am the State” Monarchy Into Despotism – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

U.S. Constitution’s Presidential Limits: The Framers’ Opposition To King Louis XIV “I Am the State” Monarchy Into Despotism

In America, the power of impeachment works to ensure that a President doesn’t abuse his office—either by abusing the rights of American citizens or by using his office for his personal enrichment. The founders were deeply troubled by centralized power, especially the idea that an absolute monarch could become a tyrannical despot. While ensuring that a President could do his job, they created a constitutional system that checked the strong powers of the executive branch.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 26: The Federalists on Diffusion of Power in American Government to Thwart Absolute Monarchy as Held by King Louis XIV – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

The Federalists on Diffusion of Power in American Government to Thwart Absolute Monarchy as Held by King Louis XIV

To be certain, whether based upon familial experience or an overall approach to political philosophy (and most likely a combination of the two), the authors of the Federalist saw that the political machinations and concentration of absolute monarchic power during the reign of King Louis XIV as something to not just avoid, but to actively work against.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 25: “Sun King,” Louis XIV, and an American Constitution That Originated From the People as Sovereign – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

“Sun King,” Louis XIV, and an American Constitution That Originated From the People as Sovereign

Yet there was another maxim in the Corpus, “What touches all must be consented to by all.” This suggests that the ultimate authority rests not in the governor, but in the governed. In the Roman republic, actions were taken in the name of the Senate and People of Rome. That idea was symbolized by the SPQR (Senatus Populusque Romanus) which was prominently displayed even on the standards of the imperial Roman legions. There is an obvious tension between these maxims. One might locate in that tension the beginning in Western political thought of the lengthy and ongoing debate over the nature of sovereignty.

90 in 90 2022, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 24: Founding Fathers on Designing a Constitution for Serving the American People, Not a Government of Machiavellian Authority – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Founding Fathers on Designing a Constitution for Serving the American People, Not a Government of Machiavellian Authority

As they debated the construction of a new Republican form of government in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787, they sought to use their knowledge of republican and authoritarian governments over thousands of years to construct one that might prevent their proposed republic from ultimately being overcome by authoritarian-minded opponents. The features of acquiring authoritarian power in government noted by Machiavelli were features that the Convention delegates sought to minimize in their new Constitution.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 22: Machiavelli, Science of Politics, and the Founders’ Solution to Prevent Government Fortifying Against the American People – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Machiavelli, Science of Politics, and the Founders’ Solution to Prevent Government Fortifying Against the American People

It should come as no surprise that such instructions during the Middle Ages came with a heavy dose of Christian ethics to civilize the prince and habituate him to just and temperate rule. After all, as Thomas Aquinas noted, God gave the ruler care of the community for the general welfare, not a license to exploit the people for the ruler’s own benefit.

90 in 90 2022, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 23: Federalists and Anti-federalists on Machiavelli and a Well-constructed Government Able To Check Attempts To Seize and Hold Power – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Federalists and Anti-federalists on Machiavelli and a Well-constructed Government Able To Check Attempts To Seize and Hold Power

The Founders’ knowledge of the successes and failures of all types of government was deep; Machiavelli’s observations of what government transitions normally looked like provided an important, more recent, reminder of how quickly a Republic can fail internally if its government is not well constructed at birth and externally when confronted by powerful, amoral governments, led by autocrats’ intent on seizing and holding power.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 21: The 1579 Netherlands Constitution and the Founders’ Vision for Careful Balance of Federal Powers While Protecting the States – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

The 1579 Netherlands Constitution and the Founders’ Vision for Careful Balance of Federal Powers While Protecting the States

The Articles of Confederation was also built on historic example, and among these was the 1579 constitution of the Netherlands provinces—the subject of Federalist #20, authored by Madison. Created as a result of the “Union of Utrecht”—a treaty created between the seven northern Dutch provinces who had allied with one another to oppose the Habsburg-controlled southern provinces, this constitution laid out the shared power structure between these unified territories. But Madison recognized that the flaws endemic in the document creating this Dutch confederacy were duplicated by the flaws in the Articles of Confederation.

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 20: Flexibility to Act Without Violating the U.S. Constitution: America’s Founders Discuss History of Policy Vices Within the United Netherlands – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Flexibility to Act Without Violating the U.S. Constitution: America’s Founders Discuss History of Policy Vices Within the United Netherlands

The Federalists defended the new Constitution’s ability to remedy these potentially deadly defects: the requirements for ratifying and amending the Constitution were reduced from unanimity to a supermajority of state conventions; furthermore, all acts of Congress under the new Constitution would require only a majority vote of both houses of Congress. This last improvement especially makes it less likely that the federal government would need to violate the Constitution to take necessary actions in times of crisis, as the United Netherlands had done on numerous occasions. This problem is further mitigated by the independence and discretion of the president to take certain actions in times of crisis without prior authorization from Congress; it is further mitigated by the fact that there are implied powers in the Constitution, as indicated by the necessary and proper clause in Article II. These improvements would give the federal government a degree of flexibility to better fulfill its responsibilities, especially with regard to national security, without the need to undermine the sanctity of the Constitution by frequent violations.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 19: United Provinces of the Netherlands and the Articles of Confederation: Factors Influencing Design Toward a Stable U.S. Constitution – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

United Provinces of the Netherlands and the Articles of Confederation: Factors Influencing Design Toward a Stable U.S. Constitution

Historians have usually described the government of the Netherlands in the two centuries between 1579 and the political system’s collapse in the late 18th century as a “republic.” Consistent with his commentary about the government of Venice, James Madison did not approve of this characterization. In Number 20 of The Federalist, he deemed the United Netherlands “a confederacy of republics, or rather of aristocracies, of a very remarkable texture.” While at times complimentary in his assessment, overall he saw in their government further evidence of what ailed, in his view, all confederations, including the United States under the Articles of Confederation. Like the Articles, the Dutch system was forged in a war for independence, the first goal of which was to survive militarily. The Dutch referred to their Revolt of the Netherlands as the “Eighty Years’ War.” Fighting against Spain began in 1566, the seven northern provinces of the Spanish Netherlands formally united in their common cause through the Union of Utrecht in 1579, a watershed step not unlike the agreements of mutual aid and action among the North American colonies in the years before 1776.

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 18: U.S. Constitution Safeguards for the Whole Union: Disunity Prevention the Founders Built in After Studying the Holy Roman Empire – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

U.S. Constitution Safeguards for the Whole Union: Disunity Prevention the Founders Built in After Studying the Holy Roman Empire

The framers of the Constitution also found remedies to prevent the “inordinate pride of state importance” from hindering the national government’s efforts to promote the good of the whole Union. By dividing Congress into two houses, the preponderance of state influence in national affairs is confined to the Senate, in which state legislatures would appoint the senators (as opposed to direct election by the people of members in the House of Representatives). Rather than each state having one vote in the Senate, the two senators do not need to agree or vote in the same way on any particular law or policy. The framers also overcame reliance on the voluntary compliance of the states to provide the needed revenue for national purposes by giving to Congress a real tax power. “There is no method of steering clear of this inconvenience,” Hamilton observed, “but by authorizing the national government to raise its own revenues in its own way.”

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 17: Ancient Confederacies, the Holy Roman Empire, and Weaknesses of Divisive Executive Authority – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Ancient Confederacies, the Holy Roman Empire, and Weaknesses of Divisive Executive Authority

Madison’s second and most important critique of the Holy Roman Empire is a lack of centralized control and effective checks over the member states. In theory, the member states are expected to restrain themselves from infringing upon the duties of the central government and are pledged to obey its authority. As Madison writes, “The members of the confederacy are expressly restricted from entering into compacts prejudicial to the empire; from imposing tolls and duties on their mutual intercourse, without the consent of the emperor and diet; from altering the value of money; from doing injustice to one another; or from affording assistance or retreat to disturbers of the public peace. And the ban is denounced against such as shall violate any of these restrictions.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 16: Electoral Structure and Allegiances of the Holy Roman Empire – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Electoral Structure and Allegiances of the Holy Roman Empire

Madison dismissed the Empire as a playground of foreign rulers because of the conflicts among the members of the Empire and between the emperor and the nobles large and small. This division allowed foreign rulers to split the allegiances of the nobles and to keep the empire weak.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 15: Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Republic of Venice, and Founding America on a Process of Governance Through Elections – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Republic of Venice, and Founding America on a Process of Governance Through Elections

Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution provides: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” This was an important provision included by the drafters to ensure a process of governance through elections. The drafters had examples of the Republic of Venice and Rome and other regimes in collapse, with concerns about other forms of government, even those labeled republics, at its core.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 14: Preventing Government Abuse: Federalist and Anti-federalist Debates on History of the Republic of Venice to Avert Concentration of Powers – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Preventing Government Abuse: Federalist and Anti-federalist Debates on History of the Republic of Venice to Avert Concentration of Powers

Jefferson opined that the concentration of legislative, executive, and judicial powers in one body would be “the definition of despotic government.” Further, it mattered not “that these powers would be exercised by a plurality of hands, and not by a single one. One hundred and seventy-three despots would surely be as oppressive as one. Let those who doubt it, turn their eyes on the republic of Venice.” Leaving aside the historical veracity of Madison’s and Jefferson’s characterizations of Venice, their perceptions shaped their ideas of a proper “republican” political structure and how that would differ from Venice.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 13: Five Hundred Years of the Republic of Venice – What Went Wrong – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Five Hundred Years of the Republic of Venice – What Went Wrong

Aristotle in his Politika did not discount the role of the demos in Athens. Like Madison, Aristotle considered democracy to be unstable and dangerous. From an analytic perspective, as was the case for Plato, democracy was a corruption of politeia, which he considered the best practical government for a city. Man is a politikon zoon, a creature which by his nature is best suited to live in the community that was the Greek polis. Once more, preserving a stable society and governing system was the key to maximizing the flourishing of each resident in accordance with the natural inequalities of each. Aristotle saw that balance in the “mixed” government of Athens, neither pure democracy nor oligarchy, in which the formal powers of the demos in the assembly and the jury courts were balanced by the Council of 500 and the practice of deference to the ideas and policies advanced by the elite of the wealthy and of those who earned military or civic honor.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 12: Necessary and Proper by the U.S. Constitution: The Founders on Limiting Federal Control in Response to Roman Republic History – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

Necessary and Proper by the U.S. Constitution: The Founders on Limiting Federal Control in Response to Roman Republic History

“We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the Government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it in the manner most beneficial to the people. Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the Constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, are Constitutional.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 11: Why Have There Been No Military Coups in the United States? – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, William Morrisey PhD

Why Have There Been No Military Coups in the United States?

The dogs of war have barked no less frequently for Americans than for other nations, but the wolf of military takeover has remained silent. And this, despite the fact that we have seen some twelve U.S. generals elevated to the presidency, beginning with George Washington. Unlike Marius, our military men have been able to become first in peace after having been first in war, without bringing a general’s command-and-control temperament with them.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 10: The Roman Republic: From Aristocracy to Dictatorship – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

The Roman Republic: From Aristocracy to Dictatorship

As societies become more sophisticated, that archaic form of tribal leadership proves inadequate. A more stable form of kingship emerges, one based on reason and excellence of judgment, which, in turn, fosters consent of the governed. Initially, such kings are elected for life. Eventually, the dynastic impulse of rulers to pass their office from father to son leads to kingship often becoming hereditary. Over time, such dynastic succession induces a sense of superiority and entitlement, which results in formal distinctions and ceremonies to set the royals apart from commoners. Worse, these royals begin to consider themselves exempt from rules and morals. As ordinary people begin to react with disgust at such licentiousness and arrogance, the ruler responds with anger and force. Thus, the inevitable outgrowth of kingship is tyranny.

90 in 90 2022, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 09: Federalists and Anti-federalists on Classic Roman Thought, Human Nature, and Forming a Successful U.S. Constitution – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Federalists and Anti-federalists on Classic Roman Thought, Human Nature, and Forming a Successful U.S. Constitution

Whether to have one or two bodies in the legislature was a topic of contention in the Convention. The final Constitution proposal was for two bodies, a House and a Senate. In Anti-federalist 63, the authors state, “But they are so formed, that the members of both must generally be the same kind of men, men having similar interests and views, feelings and connections, men of the same grade in society, and who associate on all, occasions. The Senate, from the mode of its appointment, will probably be influenced to support the state governments; and, from its periods of service will produce stability in legislation, while frequent elections may take place in the other branch.”

90 in 90 2022, Ron Meier, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 08: Human Nature and Forming Good Government: Cautions American Founders Learned from Studying Ancient Political Philosophies – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Ron Meier, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Human Nature and Forming Good Government: Cautions American Founders Learned from Studying Ancient Political Philosophies

All our Founding Fathers were educated in the early-to-middle 18th century. Some were able to attend the colleges of the day, but most were not so able and were self-taught or homeschooled. Primary and secondary education for all included study of the Bible. Libraries were few until Benjamin Franklin and his Junto Club members started the first public library in the early 18th century. Soon thereafter they started the American Philosophical Society to “promote useful knowledge.” With so few books and libraries, no internet to provide instantaneous acquisition of virtually any information or knowledge one would like to acquire, no email to communicate with anyone anywhere in the world, no Zoom to interact with experts on any topic, it’s natural to wonder how America’s Founding Fathers could have acquired the knowledge required to write the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence, and later, the United States Constitution. How were they able to create a Constitution, admired around the world, in only three months meeting in the humid city of Philadelphia in a building with no air conditioning?

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 07: The Stoics and Classic Roman Thought on Human Nature and Good Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

The Stoics and Classic Roman Thought on Human Nature and Good Government

The result was a refocus of the meaning of life from the ultimately outward-looking virtue ethics of Aristotle and the vigorous political atmosphere of the polis. In this psychological confusion and philosophic chaos arose several schools. One, the Skeptics, rejected the idea that either the senses or reason can give an accurate portrayal of reality. Everything is arbitrary and illusionary, truth cannot arise from such illusions, no assertion can claim more intrinsic value than any other, and everything devolves into a matter of relative power: law, right, morality, speech, and art. Such a valueless relativism can expose weaknesses in the assumptions and assertions of metaphysical structures, but its nihilism is self-defeating in that it provides no ethical basis for a stable social order or workable guide for personal excellence…The historian Will Durant observed, “A civilization is born stoic and dies epicurean.” By that he meant that civilizations degenerate. As he explained, “[C]ivilizations begin with religion and stoicism; they end with skepticism and unbelief, and the undisciplined pursuit of individual pleasure.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 06: How Greek and Roman Political Structures Informed the Architecture of the American Constitution and Government – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

How Greek and Roman Political Structures Informed the Architecture of the American Constitution and Government

But we have to make sure that all of the branches are working properly, lest the American experiment become a cautionary tale that scholars two millennia from now examine as an example of what not to do.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 05: How the Flaws in Classical Governance Informed Debates Over the American Constitution – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

How the Flaws in Classical Governance Informed Debates Over the American Constitution

Madison then goes on to talk about the challenges that the founders of these governments faced, showing that there is indeed a lesson in the debates that existed in Greece and Rome for those debating the ratification of the Constitution: “History informs us, likewise, of the difficulties with which these celebrated reformers had to contend, as well as the expedients which they were obliged to employ in order to carry their reforms into effect.”

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 04: Constitutions of Athens, Sparta, and Elements American Founders Changed to Form an Effective, Stable Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Constitutions of Athens, Sparta, and Elements American Founders Changed to Form an Effective, Stable Government

In classical studies and terminology, a (political) constitution is a concept that describes how a particular political system operates. It is a descriptive term and refers to actual political entities. It is, therefore, unlike what Americans are accustomed to hearing when that term is used. Rather, we think of The Constitution, a formal founding document which not only describes the skeleton of our political system, but has also attained the status of a normative standard for what is intrinsically proper political action. Thus, we can talk about constitutional law and of rights recognized in that document in defining not just how things are done, but how they ought to be done.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Sam Postell 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 03: The Five Principles That Render the American Republic More Stable – Guest Essayist: Samuel Postell, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Sam Postell

The Five Principles That Render the American Republic More Stable

Publius implied that no past regime had created the circumstances for reasonable lawmaking or political stability. Past regimes lacked liberty, but they also lacked institutional arrangements to foster reflection and cooperation in law making, and thus were ruled by the force of one or the accidents of the many.

90 in 90 2022, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Sam Postell 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 02: American Founders’ Reliance on Western Tradition: Correcting Failures of Plato, Aristotle, and Ancient Greek Thought – Guest Essayist: Samuel Postell, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Sam Postell

American Founders’ Reliance on Western Tradition: Correcting Failures of Plato, Aristotle, and Ancient Greek Thought

In Federalist 51, Publius argued that what makes a republic– a reliance on the people– is also the “primary security” for liberty. He argued that “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government.” Unlike Plato’s Republic, which relied on a philosopher king, the American Constitution relies on the virtue and wisdom of the people. Unlike Aristotle’s mixed regime, the idea of consent permeates all of our institutions. What makes the American regime unique is its firm reliance on the people as the source of political power, and the faith that the people are capable of justly wielding political power.

Blog

American Exceptionalism Revealed

Essay #1 — HISTORIC TOPIC #1: Plato, Aristotle, and Ancient Greek Thought on Human Nature and Good Government – How they succeeded and how they failed. Wisdom of the Founders: Framing a Constitution on Human Nature by Christopher C. Burkett, Associate Professor of History and Political Science; Director, Ashbrook Scholar Program, Ashland University. Essay #2 […]

90 in 90 2022, Christopher C. Burkett, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 12. American Exceptionalism Revealed, Essay 01: Wisdom of the Founders: Framing a Constitution on Human Nature – Guest Essayist: Chris Burkett, 2022 American Exceptionalism Revealed 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Christopher C. Burkett, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Wisdom of the Founders: Framing a Constitution on Human Nature

The American Founders needed to improve upon these constitutional devices because they wanted to create a political system that balanced civic virtue with liberty. To accomplish this, they established a Constitution framed upon a more realistic notion of human nature – one that acknowledged and anticipated both the good and bad aspects of human motives.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, The Honorable Michael Warren 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 01: Introduction: Revolutionary Importance of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Judge Michael Warren, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, The Honorable Michael Warren

Introduction: Revolutionary Importance of the Declaration of Independence

The importance of the Declaration of Independence can hardly be overstated. It established for the first time in world history a new nation based on the First Principles of the rule of law, unalienable rights, limited government, the Social Compact, equality, and the right to alter or abolish oppressive government.

Contrary to the beliefs of some, the American Revolution was not fought for lower taxes or to protect slavery. In fact, the tea tax which provoked the Boston Tea Party actually lowered the price of tea, and many of the Founding Fathers were opposed to slavery.

Religious texts aside, the Declaration of Independence may be the most important document in human history. It totally upended the prevailing orthodoxy about government and has led to momentous changes across time and the world. Certainly we have fallen short, over and over again, of its ideals. But without the First Principles of the Declaration of Independence, we would live in the total darkness of oppression as mankind had for a millennia before.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 03: The Declaration of Independence in History, and Contested Meaning of America’s Self-Evident Truths – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

The Declaration of Independence in History, and Contested Meaning of America’s Self-Evident Truths

In an 1857 speech criticizing the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857), Abraham Lincoln commented that the principle of equality in the Declaration of Independence was “meant to set up a standard maxim for a free society.” Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy and statesmanship was rooted upon the principles of the Declaration of Independence and their realization according to constitutional means. He consistently held that the Declaration of Independence had universal natural rights principles that were “applicable to all men and all time.” In his Gettysburg Address, Lincoln stated that the nation was “conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 04: Opposition: The Second Continental Congress, Threat of War, and America’s Decision to Move Ahead with Declaring Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Opposition: The Second Continental Congress, Threat of War, and America’s Decision to Move Ahead with Declaring Independence

Congress sought to thread the needle between protecting the Americans from intrusive British laws and engaging in sedition and treason. In constitutional terms, it meant maintaining a balance between the current state of submission to a Parliament and a ministry in which they saw themselves as unrepresented, and the de facto revolution developing on the ground. The first effort, by John Dickinson of Pennsylvania and Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, was the “Declaration on the Causes of Taking Up Arms.” It declared, “We mean not to dissolve that union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us…. We have not raised armies with ambitious designs of separation from Great Britain, and establishing independent States.” Then why the effort? “[W]e are reduced to the alternative of choosing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers, or resistance by force. The latter is our choice.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 05: Apple of Gold in a Picture of Silver: Declaration of Independence Influence on the United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Apple of Gold in a Picture of Silver: Declaration of Independence Influence on the United States Constitution

The Founders created a free constitutional republic so that Americans might govern themselves by their own consent through their representatives. Limited government meant that its powers were restricted to guarding the people’s rights and governing effectively so that the people might live their lives freely. A free people would pursue their happiness and interact amicably in the public square for a healthy civil society. In Federalist #1, Alexander Hamilton explained the entire purpose of establishing free government based upon the principles of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. He stated that Americans had the opportunity and responsibility to form good government by “reflection and choice,” not by “accident and force.” The United States was founded uniquely upon a set of principles and ideals.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 06: Declaration of Independence and Necessity of Dissolving Political Bands – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Declaration of Independence and Necessity of Dissolving Political Bands

Locke allows for much greater involvement by God, in that God gave man a nature that “put him under strong Obligations of Necessity, Convenience, and Inclination to drive him into Society, ….” Moreover, the natural rights of humans derive from the inherent dignity bestowed on humans as God’s creation. The human will still acts out of self-interest, but the contract is a much more deliberate and circumscribed bargain than Hobbes’s adhesion contract. For Locke, the government’s powers are limited to achieve the purposes for which it was established, and nothing more. With Hobbes, the individual only retained his inviolate natural right to life. With Locke, the individual retains his natural rights to liberty and property, as well as his right to life, all subject to only those limitations that make the possession of those same rights by all more secure. Any law that is inimical to those objectives and tramples on those retained rights is not true law.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 07: Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, and the American Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, and the American Declaration of Independence

These “expressions of the American mind” were common formulations of natural rights that influenced the Declaration of Independence. The four mentions of God in the document demonstrate their understanding of the divine, but it also showed that God was the author of good government according to natural law. The American founders drew from a variety of traditions in arguing for their natural rights and liberties. Ancient thought from Greece and Rome, the English tradition, and the ideas of John Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers combined with Protestantism for a rich tapestry. While the Enlightenment provided a strong influence on the founders, the contribution of their religious beliefs has often been downplayed or ignored. The average American colonial farmer or artisan may not have read John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government or ancient philosophy, but they heard dissenting religious ideals and Lockean principles from the pulpit at religious services.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 08: Declaration of Independence, and Principle That All Men Are Created Equal – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Declaration of Independence, and Principle That All Men Are Created Equal

The principle of equality protected the liberties of all citizens to create a just society. All citizens enjoyed equal political liberty by giving their consent to representative government at all levels and by participating in government. All possessed freedom of conscience regarding their religious beliefs and worship. They also had economic equality. This understanding of equality did not mean that all people had the same amount of income or property, but that they had property rights and ought to have equal opportunity to pursue their happiness and keep the fruits of their labor in a free society. During the 1858 Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln explained that the idea, “You work and toil and earn bread, and I’ll eat it,” is the “tyrannical principle” of monarchy and slavery.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 09: Endowed by Their Creator: The Declaration of Independence and Unalienable Rights – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Endowed by Their Creator: The Declaration of Independence and Unalienable Rights

Take this excerpt from a 1773 Election Sermon by Pastor Simeon Howard: “In a state of nature, or where men are under no civil government, God has given to every one liberty to pursue his own happiness in whatever way, and by whatever means he pleases, without asking the consent or consulting the inclination of any other man, provided he keeps within the bounds of the law of nature. Within these bounds, he may govern his actions, and dispose of his property and person, as he thinks proper, Nor has any man, or any number of men, a right to restrain him in the exercise of this liberty, or punish, or call him to account for using it. This however is not a state of licentiousness, for the law of nature which bounds this liberty, forbids all injustice and wickedness, allows no man to injure another in his person or property, or to destroy his own life.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 10: Consent of the Governed, and the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Consent of the Governed, and the Declaration of Independence

The American colonists were drawn to the principle of consensual government in the decade of resistance before the Declaration of Independence. The main argument of the American Revolution was, of course, “no taxation without representation.” The colonists were willing to pay taxes as British subjects, but they demanded in countless pamphlets, newspapers, petitions, declarations of rights, and speeches that they could only be taxed by their consent. This consent would be given in their colonial legislatures since they were not and could not reasonably be represented in Parliament.

In 1774, George Washington said it well when he described it with a practical example: “I think the Parliament of Great Britain hath no more Right to put their hands into my Pocket, without my consent, than I have to put my hands into yours, for money.” Washington thought it was violated constitutional and natural rights. Taxation without consent was “repugnant to every principle of natural justice…that it is not only repugnant to natural Right, but Subversive of the Laws & Constitution of Great Britain itself.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James D. Best 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 11: Declaration of Independence, and the Right of the People to Alter or Abolish Destructive Government – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best

Declaration of Independence, and the Right of the People to Alter or Abolish Destructive Government

The “right of the people to alter or abolish” their government is derived from our natural right to self-governance. The notion of self-governance is relatively new. In 1776, the world was ruled by royalty or warrior chieftains. Some upstart colonialists then penned the most revolutionary document in the history of man. Kings and queens no longer enjoyed a Divine Right to rule. Instead, the individual was now the one endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Like most revolutionary visions, this one didn’t suddenly spring onto the world stage. Baron de Montesquieu, John Locke, David Hume, Adam Smith, Thomas Paine, and many others had advocated that “consent of the governed” was dictated by the laws of nature and of nature’s God. Of course, not everyone accepted this concept—certainly not King George III or English nobility. It took seven years of warfare for the colonies to solidify their claim of self-governance.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, The Honorable David L. Robbins 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 13: Caution of the Declaration of Independence: Restrain Governments Long Established From Change Due To Light and Transient Causes – Guest Essayist: The Honorable David L. Robbins, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, The Honorable David L. Robbins

Caution of the Declaration of Independence: Restrain Governments Long Established From Change Due To Light and Transient Causes

The Founders did not necessarily want to change the whole world, even though they did, but after years of insufferable treatment by King George, his government and military, they believed they had to attempt to throw off the “forms to which they are accustomed.” The Founders pulled material from many different sources to form a new government, but they didn’t necessarily have all the answers to form a successful government to replace the British monarchy.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 14: Confronting a Long Train of Abuses and Usurpations: America Submits Facts To a Candid World by a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Confronting a Long Train of Abuses and Usurpations: America Submits Facts To a Candid World by a Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence serves as the cornerstone of our nation, and the men who created this statement of natural rights did not do so lightly. Their causes to break from Great Britain were not “light and transient causes” and they wanted to make sure that the world who was going to be reading this declaration would understand the events and circumstances that brought the colonies to the point of separation in the summer of 1776.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 15: Ideals for Legitimate Government: The Declaration of Independence, and Rule of Law – Guest Essayist: Kyle A. Scott, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD

Ideals for Legitimate Government: The Declaration of Independence, and Rule of Law

There is a difference between just and unjust rebellion and the signers are making the case that their actions are just because of their commitment to the law and King George’s refusal to abide by law and accepted practice. John Locke, the obvious muse of Thomas Jefferson, wrote, “The difference betwixt a king and a tyrant to consist only in this, that one makes the laws the bounds of his power, and the good of the public, the end of government; the other makes all give way to his own will and appetite…Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins.” By positioning their actions within the context of law, those signing the Declaration position themselves within a tradition that authorized the dissolution of government when the rule of law was no longer in force.

John McCurdy, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 16: Open for Business: Colonial Americans’ Objection To Suspended Legislation, Furthering the Push Toward a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: John McCurdy, John McCurdy, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Open for Business: Colonial Americans’ Objection To Suspended Legislation, Furthering the Push Toward a Declaration of Independence

Suspending clauses were typical in colonial America. Essentially, they stated that the law would not take effect until the king’s advisers had a chance to review the legislation and either approve it or reject it. The British government viewed this as a necessary means of keeping colonies from violating British laws like the Currency Act. The Americans, however, had a much darker view of suspending clauses. They saw them as way for the king to take away their rights by canceling laws passed by the legislatures.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 17: Formidable To Tyrants Only: Representation Denied the American Colonists Justified a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Kyle A. Scott, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD

Formidable To Tyrants Only: Representation Denied the American Colonists Justified a Declaration of Independence

By expanding their assemblies to accommodate population growth, the colonies were following the procedures and processes that had been in place up to that point. King George’s actions did not follow precedent and had no recourse to the common good or legal principle, but represented his will to control. This capricious decision based on nothing more than his will to exert power is a violation of the fundamental principle of what gives government legitimacy. When the King works for his good only it is a dereliction of duty and gives those governed the right to dissolve the bonds of government.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 18: Disruption of Self-Government: Fatiguing America Into Compliance With Harsh Measures – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Disruption of Self-Government: Fatiguing America Into Compliance With Harsh Measures

The dislocation and dissolution of these Colonial Legislatures led to the same disruption and “discomfort” experienced by Massachusetts’ elected representatives. The goal of punishing opposition and suppressing dissent was achieved by forcing elected officials into “places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records.” It certainly interfered with the colony’s public business and prevented officials from “access to information necessary to conduct it.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 19: Invasions on the Rights of the People: Dissolved Legislatures, and the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Invasions on the Rights of the People: Dissolved Legislatures, and the Declaration of Independence

However, the continued attempts at taxing the colonists in the Stamp Act (1765), Townshend Acts (1767), and Tea Act (1773), among other taxes, demonstrated to the colonists that the British ministry was bent on tyranny in the colonies. The British government was burdened by a massive debt incurred in fighting the Seven Years’ War and wanted the colonists to pay for thousands of redcoats stationed in forts out west. The Americans responded by demanding in countless pamphlets, newspapers, petitions, declarations of rights, and speeches that they could only be taxed by their consent. For Washington, self-government was a moral principle and must be defended. “That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment to use arms in defense of so valuable a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life depends.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 20: Delayed Elections and Dissolved Legislatures: Threats To the Independence of Their Assemblies – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Delayed Elections and Dissolved Legislatures: Threats To the Independence of Their Assemblies

The British government’s abandonment of its constitutional relationship with the colonies had breached the contract on which the political commonwealth was based. Thus, the people were placed in a new “pre-political” condition. In this stage, each individual was sovereign over his or her own affairs. The legislative power had not been annihilated, but rested within each individual for himself or herself. As anticipated by the social contract theorists and reflected in the Declaration of Independence itself, these individuals would establish new forms of government in order better to secure their God-given inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. By the consent of the governed, the legislative power would then be exercised by the people collectively as in a democracy, or, more likely, by an assembly elected by the people as in a republic.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 21: Raising Conditions of New Appropriations of Lands: Citizenship and Obstructing Economic Independence in the American Colonies – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Raising Conditions of New Appropriations of Lands: Citizenship and Obstructing Economic Independence in the American Colonies

In December 1773, King George III (reigned 1760-1820) suspended the “Plantation” or “Immigration” Act of 1740. His intent was to strike at the heart of the economic engine fueling economic independence among the American colonies. His other goal was to extinguish momentum for independent thought and religious expression. These actions formed the basis for this grievance in the Declaration of Independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Steven H. Aden 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 22: The Heart and Lungs of Liberty: Representative Government and Trial by Jury – Guest Essayist: Steven H. Aden, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Steven H. Aden

The Heart and Lungs of Liberty: Representative Government and Trial by Jury

Things were coming to a head. Future president John Adams thundered, “Representative government and trial by jury are the heart and lungs of liberty. Without them, we have no other fortification against being ridden like horses, fleeced like sheep, worked like cattle, and fed and clothed like swine and hounds.” And Thomas Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration, would later write to essayist Thomas Paine (Common Sense), “I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Steven H. Aden 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 23: Accountability of Judges, and the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Steven H. Aden, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Steven H. Aden

Accountability of Judges, and the Declaration of Independence

The experience of Massachusetts was still fresh in the minds of the Founders. An act of Parliament in 1773 had decreed that the salaries of judges would be paid by the King at his discretion, and forbidden them to receive salaries from the colony’s legislature. John Adams, a Bostonian and later contributor to the Declaration and America’s second president, observed, “This as the Judges Commissions were during pleasure made them entirely dependent on the Crown for Bread [as] well as office.” Adams explained: It was by all Agreed, As the [Royal] Governor was entirely dependent on the Crown, and the [colonial] Council in danger of becoming so if the Judges were made so too, the Liberties of the Country would be totally lost, and every Man at the Mercy of a few Slaves of the Governor.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 24: Eating Out Their Substance: Ever-Expanding and Intrusive Presence of Tax Collectors, and the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

Eating Out Their Substance: Ever-Expanding and Intrusive Presence of Tax Collectors, and the Declaration of Independence

“They planted by your care? No! Your oppression planted ‘em in America. They fled from your tyranny to a then uncultivated and unhospitable country where they exposed themselves to almost all the hardships to which human nature is liable…They nourished by your indulgence? They grew by your neglect of ‘em. As soon as you began to care about ‘em, that care was exercised in sending persons to rule over ’em, in one department and another, who were perhaps the deputies of deputies to some member of this house, sent to spy out their liberty, to misrepresent their actions and to prey upon ’em; men whose behavior on many occasions has caused the blood of those sons of liberty to recoil within them….They protected by your arms? They have nobly taken up arms in your defense, have exerted a valor amidst their constant and laborious industry for the defense of a country whose frontier while drenched in blood, its interior parts have yielded all its little savings to your emolument …. The people I believe are as truly loyal as any subjects the King has, but a people jealous of their liberties, and who will vindicate them if ever they should be violated.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 25: Securing Freedom: Protecting the Colonies Amidst Mounting Aggression, Necessitating a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Securing Freedom: Protecting the Colonies Amidst Mounting Aggression, Necessitating a Declaration of Independence

The British had established a military presence in the 13 colonies since their inception in the 1600s. Military conflicts were a way of life in the colonies and they included wars with Native-Americans, the Dutch, Spain and France. The largest number of British troops were sent to the colonies during the French and Indian War in the 1750s and 60s. As a result of that conflict, Britain was plunged into tremendous debt and arrived at the conclusion that the colonies, who lived under the protection of the greatest military force on the planet, should pay for that protection from outside invasions and threats from Native Americans. That payment would come in the form of several Acts of Parliament resulting in taxation, bringing increased revenue to the British empire. When the colonists rebelled against these Acts and displayed behavior that King George III felt was dangerous and treasonous, he took action and sent more troops to the colonies to quiet the dissention. It did not work.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 26: Attempts to Bring the American Colonists to Heel: Military Independent of and Superior to the Civil Power – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Attempts to Bring the American Colonists to Heel: Military Independent of and Superior to the Civil Power

It was the asserted refusal of the British to subordinate their military forces in the colonies to civilian control that created one of the points of conflict leading to the American revolution. Both the Virginia Constitution of 1776 and the Declaration of Independence of the thirteen “united states” denounced the king’s “affect[ing] to render the Military independent of and superior to, the Civil power.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 27: Foreign To Our Constitution: Abolishing Our Most Valuable Laws, Altering Fundamentally the Forms of Our Governments – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Foreign To Our Constitution: Abolishing Our Most Valuable Laws, Altering Fundamentally the Forms of Our Governments

Yes, the colonists were British subjects. Yes, they were subject to British law, but the King and his ministers and the Parliament had overlooked an important point: over the last 150 years the colonists had become a new people with a new taste for freedom enjoyed by few other people on earth, and they were not going to readily give it up to an emboldened bully called Parliament.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 28: Unworthy the Head of a Civilized Nation: Waging War Against Us by Completing the Works of Death – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Unworthy the Head of a Civilized Nation: Waging War Against Us by Completing the Works of Death

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 29: Answered Only by Repeated Injury: Petitions for Redress, and a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Answered Only by Repeated Injury: Petitions for Redress, and a Declaration of Independence

The war followed from a decade of tyranny, taxes, and violations of the colonists’ right to govern themselves by their own consent. The colonists continually sent petitions to king and Parliament to protest these oppressions and humbly ask for a redress of grievances. The right of petition was a traditional right of Englishmen with a long history reaching back to the Magna Carta (1215) and the Bill of Rights (1689). The colonists were angry about the violations of their rights and liberties but were just as irate that their petitions were ignored or treated with disdain.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 30: Totally Dissolved: Releasing America From All Allegiance To the British Crown Through a Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Totally Dissolved: Releasing America From All Allegiance To the British Crown Through a Declaration of Independence

The United States was created in this document and the members of the Second Continental Congress tell us how serious they were in creating it, as well as telling the World how they would defend it for themselves and future generations of Americans. The United States is now its own nation and can conduct itself accordingly. The signers are also letting the world know they acted with the best intentions and they appeal to God for the final verdict on those intentions. They end this conclusion of text by stating that they fully understand that if they do not succeed, they will be charged with treason and executed. They were willing to give everything so that our new nation had a chance at survival.

Winfield H. Rose, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Winfield H. Rose, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 31: The Drafting Committee of Five, and 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Winfield H. Rose, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

The Drafting Committee of Five, and 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence

“We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately” is commonly attributed to Benjamin Franklin after the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. The moment was not captured and preserved by Movietone News but, whether true or not, that sentence captures the gravity of the action those 56 men took when they signed the document that ended with the words “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tara Ross 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 32: Josiah Bartlett, Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tara Ross, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tara Ross

Josiah Bartlett, Signer of the Declaration of Independence

As tensions with England began to rise, Bartlett was elected to New Hampshire’s legislature. He was serving as a member of that body during the Stamp Act controversy. One early historian notes that the Royal Governor attempted to bribe Bartlett into siding with the Crown, but Bartlett “rejected every overture.”

Ron Meier, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Ron Meier, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 33: William Whipple of New Hampshire: Ship Captain, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

William Whipple of New Hampshire: Ship Captain, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

With the outbreak of the Revolution, William Whipple began his long career as a public servant. In June 1774 he was on a Committee to prevent the landing of tea in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. He became a member of the Committee of Safety and was a member of the Provincial Convention held at Exeter. In 1776, Whipple was sent by New Hampshire as one of its three delegates to the Continental Congress. With his seafaring experience and his family’s ship building experience, he was appointed to the Marine Committee. To run the British Navy’s blockades, the new country would need more ships and experienced ship Captains; Whipple’s background prepared him well for leading that effort. He also served as a superintendent of the commissary and quartermaster departments, attempting to bring efficiency to departments that seemed to have great difficulty supplying General George Washington’s forces with what they needed to fight the war.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 34: Matthew Thornton of New Hampshire: Physician, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Matthew Thornton of New Hampshire: Physician, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Matthew Thornton of New Hampshire was a man who excelled in all that he did, as a physician and surgeon, in the New Hampshire legislature, and as a judge. We are also indebted to Thornton for his efforts to help America gain her independence from England, including his signing of the Declaration of Independence. This accomplished patriot was born in Lisburn, County Antrim, Ireland on March 3, 1714 to James and Elizabeth Thornton, Scotch-Irish Presbyterian farmers. Interestingly, Matthew was one of three signers of the Declaration of Independence born in Ireland, James Smith and George Taylor, both of Pennsylvania, being the other two.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 35: John Hancock of Massachusetts: First and Largest Signature on the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

John Hancock of Massachusetts: First and Largest Signature on the Declaration of Independence

Hancock would later spend his own money to help fund the Continental Army in 1775 and throughout the war. He took his generous nature and applied it to the entire nation. John Hancock passed away in 1793, while serving as the governor of the Constitutional Convention of Massachusetts. His funeral was a huge event in Boston as one of their Sons of Liberty had passed. Church bells tolled, businesses closed out of respect to him and he was laid to rest in Boston as one of the main voices of independence and an enduring legacy as one of our key Founding Fathers. He once said, “I am a friend to righteous government, to a government founded upon the principles of reason and justice. But I glory in publicly avowing my eternal enmity to tyranny.” His most public display of these words was his signature on the Declaration of Independence.

90 in 90 2021, Jeanne McKinney, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 36: Samuel Adams of Massachusetts: Firebrand for the American Revolution, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Jeanne McKinney, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, Jeanne McKinney, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Samuel Adams of Massachusetts: Firebrand for the American Revolution, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

“Better tidings will soon arrive. Our cause is just and righteous and we shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we show ourselves worthy of its aid and protection.” – Samuel Adams while encouraging wavering Continental Convention delegates in the gloomy winter of 1776-1777. Among his accomplishments, he founded Boston’s Committee of Correspondence, which – like similar entities in other towns across the Colonies – proved a powerful tool for communication and coordination during the American Revolutionary War.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 37: John Adams of Massachusetts: Second President of the United States, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

John Adams of Massachusetts: Second President of the United States, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Like Aristotle and Polybius, Adams feared that pure forms, especially democracies, were unstable and inevitably led to tyranny, because of man’s lust for power due to his fallen nature. Classic republics fared little better, because they, too, relied on human virtue to sustain them. Adams doubted that Americans possessed sufficient virtue, though strong government direction through support of religion and morality might have a positive influence. The “mixed government” of the Massachusetts Constitution of 1787 became the system of “checks and balances” of the United States Constitution which would augment reliance on the people’s virtue in sustaining liberty. As Madison wrote in The Federalist No. 51, to preserve liberty while allowing government to function, “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Tom Hand, Essay 38: Robert Treat Paine: Pastor, Massachusetts Attorney General and Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Robert Treat Paine: Pastor, Massachusetts Attorney General and Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Due to Robert’s father losing his fortune in 1749, Robert knew he had to make his own way in the world. After teaching for a year, Robert went to sea as a merchant ship captain from 1751-1754. His business pursuits were not very lucrative and, in 1755, he began to study law under Judge Samuel Willard, a relative in Lancaster, Massachusetts. To help make ends meet, Paine continued to preach part-time in nearby Shirley. In 1755, the French and Indian War had started. As any adventurous young man might do, Paine took a three-month break from his studies and volunteered as a chaplain on an expedition to assault Fort Saint-Frederic (today Crown Point). While the attack did not amount to much, it was a good experience for Paine and gave him an appreciation for the military and the needs of an army.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Tom Hand, Essay 39: Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Vice President of the United States Under James Madison – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Vice President of the United States Under James Madison

Gerry continued to serve in Congress and was a signer of the Articles of Confederation, but he left that assembly in 1780 over a concern that too much power was being concentrated in the central government. In 1783, Gerry was persuaded to return to the Confederation Congress which was meeting in New York. While there, Elbridge met Ann Thompson and the two were married in 1786. Over the course of the next fifteen years, the couple had ten children.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Tom Hand, Essay 40: Stephen Hopkins of Rhode Island: General Assembly Speaker, Superior Court Chief Justice, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Stephen Hopkins of Rhode Island: General Assembly Speaker, Superior Court Chief Justice, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

His mother, Ruth Wilkinson, was the granddaughter of Lawrence Wilkinson who arrived in Providence in 1652. Stephen grew up on a farm in what is now the town of Scituate (it broke off from Providence in 1731) receiving virtually no formal schooling. Instead, he read all the classics and was instructed by his mother and other relatives in subjects such as mathematics and surveying. By all accounts, Hopkins was very bright.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Tom Hand, Essay 41: William Ellery of Rhode Island: Merchant, Lawyer, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

William Ellery of Rhode Island: Merchant, Lawyer, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

When relations between England and her American colonies soured in the 1760s, Ellery became a vocal opponent of British oppression and joined the Sons of Liberty, a group of like-minded Patriots. He stated, “To be ruled by Tories (supporters of England) when you may be ruled by the Sons of Liberty is debasing.” Ellery joined this assemblage on May 16, 1776, and proudly affixed his signature to the Declaration of Independence when it was officially signed on August 2, 1776. He wrote to his brother Benjamin, “We have lived to see a period which a few years ago no human forecast could have imagined – to see these Colonies shake off and declare themselves independent of a state which they once gloried to call Parent.”

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 42: Roger Sherman of Connecticut: Signer of Five Most Important United States Founding Documents Including the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Roger Sherman of Connecticut: Signer of Five Most Important United States Founding Documents Including the Declaration of Independence

Roger Sherman is representative of the many great Americans who sacrificed and worked so diligently to create America. While our schoolbooks typically teach us about a few monumental figures like Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton, and Adams, the yeoman’s work of creating this wonderful country of ours was done by so many forgotten figures. Moreover, Roger Sherman, a farmer’s son with limited formal education, is a shining example of what people from modest circumstances and with few opportunities can accomplish in this great country of ours by applying themselves. This sort of rags-to riches story can only happen in America and we need to be reminded of that fact.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 43: Samuel Huntington: Farmer, Connecticut Supreme Court Justice, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Samuel Huntington: Farmer, Connecticut Supreme Court Justice, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Samuel Huntington was a man who devoted much of his life to the service of his country. From the age of 33 until he passed away in his 64th year, Huntington served in some public capacity, including state assemblyman, Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court, President of the Continental Congress, and Governor of his home state of Connecticut. During his time, this Signer of the Declaration of Independence was so highly regarded that he was awarded honorary degrees from Princeton, Dartmouth, and Yale. Additionally, his acquaintances included George Washington, John Adams, and Ben Franklin. That is impressive for any man, let alone one who was self-educated and began life as a farmer. A man like that deserves to be remembered by us today.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Eric Wise 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 44: William Williams of Connecticut: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Pinch Hitting for the United States of America – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Eric Wise

William Williams of Connecticut: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Pinch Hitting for the United States of America

The Fundamental Orders were the first charter government that did not refer to the authority of the King of England, but rather to the authority of God through the people. As Hooker put it – fifty years before John Locke penned his Second Treatise on Government in 1689 – “the foundation of authority is laid, firstly in the free consent of the people … the choice of public magistrates belongs unto the people by God’s own allowance.” The signers of the Declaration of Independence all pledged “our lives, our fortunes and our sacred Honor” to the success of the Revolution. Many paid dearly with the first two, though all in time gained honor. Williams, when he signed the Declaration, had achieved a great deal as a pre-Revolutionary American and had much at stake.

Robert Brescia, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Robert Brescia, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 45: Oliver Wolcott of Connecticut: Major General in the Revolutionary War, Sheriff, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Robert Brescia, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Oliver Wolcott of Connecticut: Major General in the Revolutionary War, Sheriff, Governor, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Willing to fight for these strong beliefs of freedom and self-determination, Wolcott led Connecticut’s Seventeenth Regiment of militia to New York, joining George Washington’s army. At that moment, then Connecticut Governor Jonathan Trumbull appointed Wolcott as a Brigadier General, commanding all the state’s militia regiments in New York, later being promoted to Major General. Oliver never wavered in his fierce opposition to Great Britain, describing the British in his memoirs as “a foe who have not only insulted every principle which governs civilized nations but by their barbarities offered the grossest indignities to human nature.”

Jay McConville, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Jay McConville, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 46: William Floyd of New York: Major General in the Revolutionary War; Representative in the First US Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Jay McConville, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

William Floyd of New York: Major General in the Revolutionary War; Representative in the First United States Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

It was a life well lived, in times of struggle and change. Records from the time do not make much mention of Floyd. He was not a visible presence or vocal voice in the Congress. Records from the proceedings mention his presence, but his impression on other delegates might well be summarized in a contemporary’s letter to John Jay, that named William Floyd as one of the “good men, [who] never quit their chairs” (Grossman, 2014, p. 397). We should all be grateful to those, who like Floyd, never quit their chairs, and ensured the founding of our nation through their service and sacrifice.

Richard K. Sala, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Richard K. Sala, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 47: Philip Livingston of New York: Merchant, Member of the First Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Richard Sala, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Philip Livingston of New York: Merchant, Member of the First Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

For Americans from “sea to shining sea,” the saga of American independence begins in July 1776. For Philip Livingston, one of four New York delegates to sign the Declaration of Independence, the origins of this great epoch commenced some eleven years earlier under comparable duress and at similar risk.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 48: Francis Lewis of New York: Businessman, Prisoner of War, Stamp Act and Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Francis Lewis of New York: Businessman, Prisoner of War, Stamp Act and Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Despite his wealth and his involvement in public affairs at an exceptional time, Lewis was no stranger to personal tragedy. Already mentioned was his loss of both parents as a young child, left also without siblings. Only three of his seven children reached adulthood. Perhaps most traumatic was the fate that befell his wife. Lewis had married Elizabeth Annesley, his business partner’s sister, in 1745. While Lewis was away, in 1776, his house in Whitestone, in today’s Queens, New York, was destroyed by the British after the Battle of Brooklyn. Soldiers from a light cavalry troop pillaged the house, and a warship then opened fire. Worse, the British took his wife prisoner and held her for two years. Historical sources aver that the conditions of her captivity were inhumane in that the British denied her a bed, a change of clothing, or adequate food over several weeks.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 49: Lewis Morris: Major General in the New York Militia, Delegate to the Second Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Lewis Morris: Major General in the New York Militia, Delegate to the Second Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

When the fateful day came to affix his signature to the Declaration of Independence, Morris was warned by family members that doing so would result in the loss of his estate and fortune since British troops were stationed near his home. Morris famously replied, “Damn the consequences, give me the pen.” As it turned out, his relations were correct. The British quickly devastated his 1,000-acre forest, confiscated all his livestock, and destroyed his beautiful home at Morrisania. Additionally, Morris and his family were forced to go into exile for the duration of the war.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 50: Richard Stockton: New Jersey Supreme Court Justice, Delegate to the Second Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

Richard Stockton: New Jersey Supreme Court Justice, Delegate to the Second Continental Congress, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

These brave patriots did in fact suffer, Stockton not being the only person to suffer losses. Five signers reportedly were captured by the British and brutally tortured as traitors. Nine signers fought in the Revolutionary War and died from wounds or hardships. A large number of the 56, a dozen or more, had their homes pillaged and burned. Benjamin Franklin, one of the few signers of the Declaration and the Constitution, said after signing the Declaration, “We must indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall hang separately.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 51: John Witherspoon: Presbyterian Minister, President of the College of New Jersey (Princeton), and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

John Witherspoon: Presbyterian Minister, President of the College of New Jersey (Princeton), and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Despite the best efforts of several excellent historians, the contributions of the dissenting Protestant clergy, known as the “Black Robe Regiment” or “Black Regiment,” to the dissemination of revolutionary principles has largely gone unnoticed. The ministers were instrumental in propagating the ideas of John Locke from the pulpit for congregations that were consistent with the revolutionary ideas they read about in pamphlets and newspapers and heard in taverns and legislative halls that formed “the American mind.” The ministers preached about the ideas of natural rights, self-government by consent, and the right of revolution against tyranny. They urged the young men in their congregations to pick up their muskets and go to war in the defense of their sacred rights from God. The clergy delivered what are called political sermons as they easily wove together their religious and political ideals with their covenant theology that Americans were a new Chosen People.

Ron Meier, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Ron Meier, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 52: Francis Hopkinson of New Jersey: Merchant, Judge, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Francis Hopkinson of New Jersey: Merchant, Judge, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

At this time, Revolutionary fervor was accelerating in the colonies over customs fees and Hopkinson relinquished his role as Customs Collector when New Jersey Royal Governor, William Franklin, well aware of Hopkinson’s apparent loyalty to the British government and of his political connections in London, named him to the New Jersey Provincial Council, the upper house of the New Jersey Legislature, in 1773. Hopkinson then moved his family to his wife’s hometown of Bordentown, New Jersey where he once again entered the practice of law. During this time, he became disenchanted with the British government’s hostility to Americans’ rights and freedoms and joined the patriot cause, writing many patriotic pamphlets and satires, employing a common practice of using a variety of pseudonyms, that were widely circulated in the colonies.

Ron Meier, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Ron Meier, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 53: John Hart: Farmer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, First Speaker of the New Jersey State Legislature, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

John Hart: Farmer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, First Speaker of the New Jersey State Legislature, and Declaration of Independence Signer

On August 13, Hart was elected to the State Assembly of New Jersey and on August 29 he was elected Speaker of the General Assembly. Hart presided over the Assembly briefly but was called home to care for his sick wife. He returned to the Assembly on October 7, but was called home once more. The Assembly adjourned on August 8, the same day that his wife died, leaving behind her husband and thirteen children, two of whom were still minors. In November, the British army invaded New Jersey and Hart was forced to hide out in some rock formations in the nearby Sourwood Mountains to escape British soldiers and Hessian mercenaries who damaged, but did not destroy, the farm.

Heather B. Bailey, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Heather B. Bailey, Essay 54: Abraham Clark of New Jersey: Surveyor, Lawyer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Heather B. Bailey, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Abraham Clark of New Jersey: Surveyor, Lawyer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

No doubt the proximity of tensions created by British Control were driving forces behind his decisions, at the time, again to pursue fairness, even if that meant risking all and joining forces to work toward independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 55: Robert Morris of Pennsylvania: Merchant, Superintendent of Finance, Agent of Marine, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Robert Morris of Pennsylvania: Merchant, Superintendent of Finance, Agent of Marine, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Robert Morris, Jr., is one of only two men who signed the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution of 1787. He thus was present at three critical moments in the founding of the United States. His most significant contributions to that founding occurred during the decade of turmoil framed by the first and last of these, that is, the period of the Revolutionary War and the Confederation.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, William J. Federer 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 56: Benjamin Rush of Pennsylvania: Physician, United States Mint Treasurer, Continental Congress Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: William J. Federer, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, William J. Federer

Benjamin Rush of Pennsylvania: Physician, United States Mint Treasurer, Continental Congress Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Dr. Benjamin Rush had studied medicine in Philadelphia, then in Europe under the world’s foremost physicians, and then returned to Philadelphia in 1769. Though his practices were archaic by today’s standards, he is considered by some as the “Father of American Medicine” for his work on staff at the Pennsylvania Hospital, where he opened the first free medical clinic. He was among the first to recognize alcoholism as a disease and began to promote temperance. Dr. Rush wrote the first textbook on mental illness and psychiatry, recommending treatment with kindness, earning him the title “Father of American Psychiatry.”

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 57: Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania: Printer, Scientist, Postmaster, Fireman, “Committee of Five” Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania: Printer, Scientist, Postmaster, Fireman, “Committee of Five” Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Franklin was later appointed to the “Committee of Five” to draft a declaration of independence for the colonies. He served on the committee with Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston. Jefferson was the primary author, but Franklin did suggest some important edits. His most famous edit was changing the phrase, “We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable” to “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” Franklin believed that the term “sacred” sounded too religious and that “self-evident” sounded more scientific. Even though he was not the primary author, many of the ideas within the Declaration of Independence had been spoken by Dr. Franklin in the previous months and years. He wholeheartedly supported the document and voted in favor of Independence on July 2, 1776.

Ron Meier, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Ron Meier, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 58: John Morton of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia Assembly Speaker, First and Second Continental Congress Member, Sheriff, Judge, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

John Morton of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia Assembly Speaker, First and Second Continental Congress Member, Sheriff, Judge, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Morton’s first responsibility for petitioning the King for redress of rights was his appointment to the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. From that first act of the colonists until the final vote on July 2, 1776, the colonists’ primary objective was not to seek independence, but to protest unjust actions of the British Parliament and to remain loyal to the mother country by seeking reconciliation. The repeated refusal of the British Parliament and King to consider their requests over the subsequent 10 years drove the colonists to unite for independence in the end.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gordon Lloyd, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 59: George Clymer of Pennsylvania: Merchant, Continental Treasurer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Gordon Lloyd, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gordon Lloyd PhD

George Clymer of Pennsylvania: Merchant, Continental Treasurer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Despite Clymer’s extensive involvement in the story of the American founding, he is not on the list of influential, or even underrated founders. We attribute this to Clymer’s inclination to work behind the scenes on the various committees to which his colleagues elected him. He reminds us of the steady and vital work done by individuals who do not seek the limelight. Contemporary William Pierce of Georgia, who provided character sketches of multiple founders, portrayed him as “a respectable man, and much esteemed.”

Ertis Tereziu, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Ertis Tereziu, Essay 60: James Smith: Attorney, Judge, Brigadier General of the Pennsylvania Militia, Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Ertis Tereziu, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

James Smith: Attorney, Judge, Brigadier General of the Pennsylvania Militia, Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

However, a fire destroyed his office and papers shortly before he passed away. Because of this incident, not much is known about James Smith’s work. The result is that historians study Smith not through his journals, but through his actions. And his act of bravely signing the Declaration of Independence shows the world that James Smith believed that all men are created equal and are endowed with certain unalienable rights.

Tom Hand, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 61: George Taylor of Pennsylvania: Coal Worker, Ironmaster, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tom Hand, Tom Hand, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

George Taylor of Pennsylvania: Coal Worker, Ironmaster, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

George Taylor was a foreign-born patriot who began his adult life as an indentured servant, but rose to be one of the 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence. This relatively unknown man’s life is emblematic of the many everyday Americans who helped in our cause for independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 62: James Wilson of Pennsylvania: Land Speculator, Lawyer, 2nd Cont. Congress Delegate, U.S. Supreme Court Justice & Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

James Wilson of Pennsylvania: Land Speculator, Lawyer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and Declaration of Independence Signer

It appears that Smith’s influence was more constructive than Hume’s. The latter denied the essential existence of such concepts as virtue and vice. Hume instead characterized them as artificial constructs or mere opinion. Wilson was critical of Hume’s patent skepticism, deeming it flawed and derogatory of what Wilson saw as the moral sensibilities integral to human nature. He considered Hume’s skepticism inconsistent with what he viewed as the ethical basis of the political commonwealth, that is, consent of the governed. As he wrote later, “All men are, by nature equal and free: no one has a right to any authority over another without his consent: all lawful government is founded on the consent of those who are subject to it.” However, Wilson also believed, along with John Adams and many other republicans of the time, that such consent could only be given by a virtuous people. In short, Wilson’s democratic vision was elitist in practice. The governed whose consent mattered were the propertied classes. The others might register their consent, but only under the watchful eyes of their virtuous betters in society.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 63: George Ross of Pennsylvania: Minister, Lawyer, Army Colonel, Continental Congress Delegate, Uncle of Betsy Ross, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

George Ross of Pennsylvania: Minister, Lawyer, Army Colonel, Continental Congress Delegate, Uncle of Betsy Ross, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Ross’ skill as a lawyer was quickly noticed, resulting in his appointment as Crown Prosecutor (Attorney General) for Carlisle, Pennsylvania, serving for 12 years. In 1768, he was elected to the Pennsylvania legislature, representing Lancaster. There his Tory politics began to change and he was soon heard supporting the growing calls for American independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Robert McDonald 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 64: Caesar Rodney of Delaware: Stamp Act Congress Delegate, Governor, Militia Officer, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Robert M. S. McDonald, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Robert McDonald

Caesar Rodney of Delaware: Stamp Act Congress Delegate, Governor, Militia Officer, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Slavery as well as many other abhorrent forms of inequality were considered normal in the eighteenth century. Monarchy and tyranny were common nearly everywhere. To Caesar Rodney’s credit, he helped to establish the United States as an exception to this rule. He not only voted to break free from Britain but also signed the Declaration of Independence, which asserted the “self-evident” “truths” that all mankind are equally “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” Almost immediately, states with fewer slaves began either to abolish slavery or enact plans for gradual emancipation. Eventually, as the Civil War concluded, President Abraham Lincoln invoked the ideas of the American Revolution to outlaw slavery throughout the United States. The Revolution sparked many other gains for equality, as well. Even today, people appropriate its principles in support of liberty and equal rights.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gordon Lloyd, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 65: George Read: Attorney General, Acting Governor, Delaware Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Gordon Lloyd, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gordon Lloyd PhD

George Read: Attorney General, Acting Governor, Delaware Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

George Read (1733-1798) was born in Maryland from a line of Irish and Welsh immigrants. However, he was raised in Delaware. He died in New Castle and is buried in Immanuel Episcopal Churchyard in Newcastle. Read was educated in Pennsylvania where he studied law and admitted to the Philadelphia Bar at age 20. In 1754, he returned to Delaware. In 1763, he married the widowed sister of George Ross, fellow signer of the Declaration of Independence from Pennsylvania and uncle of Betsy Ross. What is impressive is Read’s forty-year involvement in local, state, and national politics during which time he embraced both the politics of reconciliation with Britain in 1776 and the politics of change from 1786.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gordon Lloyd, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 66: Thomas McKean of Delaware: Militia Colonel, State Deputy AG and Chief Justice; Continental Congress President and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Gordon Lloyd, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gordon Lloyd PhD

Thomas McKean of Delaware: Militia Colonel, State Deputy Attorney General and Chief Justice; Continental Congress President and Declaration of Independence Signer

In 1775, he represented Delaware at the Stamp Act Congress in New York and then Pennsylvania at the Continental Congress from 1774-1777. On July 1, 1776, two of the three Delaware delegates were in attendance. McKean voted in favor of Independence and George Read voted against it. McKean strongly opposed the power that the British were imposing upon the colonies. He sent an urgent message to Caesar Rodney in Dover to come at once to Philadelphia to break the deadlock. Rodney rode overnight in a rainstorm, having arrived wearing boots and spurs as described by McKean, and the deadlock was broken on July 2.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 67: Samuel Chase of Maryland: Attorney, United States Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Samuel Chase of Maryland: Attorney, United States Supreme Court Justice, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

In 1791, Chase became chief justice of the Maryland General Court, where he stayed until he was appointed to the United States Supreme Court by President George Washington in 1796. Chase served in that capacity until his death in 1811.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 68: William Paca of Maryland: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Judge, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

William Paca of Maryland: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Judge, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

William Paca cared deeply for the veterans of the American Revolution and he did everything possible after the war to help them in any way that he could, personally, legally and financially. As a result of these actions, in 1783, he became an honorary member of the society of the Cincinnati. Membership in the Society was usually reserved for Revolutionary War officers, but Paca was given this honor due to his constant efforts to support the Revolutionary war veterans. After the Revolutionary War ended, Paca served in various legal roles within the state of Maryland, including serving as their third governor. He would also later help to push forward many of the amendments to the constitution that would become the Bill of Rights.

Ron Meier, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Ron Meier, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 69: Thomas Stone of Maryland: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Committee of Correspondence Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Ron Meier, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Thomas Stone of Maryland: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Committee of Correspondence Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer

As the British Navy, with more than 30,000 troops aboard hundreds of ships, assembled in New York’s harbor to prepare to do battle with Washington’s troops, including the Maryland Line, on Long Island, reconciliation appeared hopeless and sentiment among the delegates to the Congress moved more towards independence. Virginia’s Richard Henry Lee introduced the independence resolution to the Congress in early June and Jefferson began writing the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Stone moved ever so slowly, but firmly, in favor of independence, and cast his Yea vote on July 2. He returned on August 2 to sign the Declaration.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Colleen Sheehan 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 70: Charles Carroll of Carrollton, Maryland: State Constitution Framer, Continental Congress Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Colleen Sheehan, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Colleen Sheehan

Charles Carroll of Carrollton, Maryland: State Constitution Framer, Continental Congress Member, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Charles Carroll of Carrollton was a third generation American. His grandfather emigrated from Great Britain to America in the late seventeenth century, procuring a large tract of land in Maryland. At ten Charles was sent to a Jesuit school, subsequently attending Jesuit colleges in French Flanders and Reims, and then attending the College Louis le Grand in Paris. The next few years he studied law in France and then in England, at the Temple, London.

Suzanne Munson, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Suzanne Munson, Essay 71: George Wythe of Virginia: Continental Congress Delegate, Judge, Professor of Law, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Suzanne Harman Munson, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

George Wythe of Virginia: Continental Congress Delegate, Judge, Professor of Law, and Declaration of Independence Signer

In Philadelphia, when Jefferson was tasked with writing the Declaration of Independence, he studied a document drafted a short time earlier by a committee consisting of Wythe, Edward Rutledge, Sam Adams, and himself, considered a precursor to the Declaration. On May 29, the Continental Congress resolved to publish a “animated address” to the inhabitants of the colonies to “impress the minds of the people with the necessity of their now stepping forward to save their country, their freedom and property.” Significant numbers of Americans were not convinced of the need to sever ties with the Mother Country. The address persuaded the colonies that they must act to deliver their country from bondage by “uniting firmly, resolving wisely, and acting vigorously.” The surviving draft is in Wythe’s handwriting, and Jefferson preserved it among his most important papers.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 72: Richard Henry Lee of Virginia: Continental Congress Delegate, Author of the Resolution That Led to the Declaration of Independence, and Signatory – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Richard Henry Lee of Virginia: Continental Congress Delegate, Author of the Resolution That Led to the Declaration of Independence, and Signatory

In May, 1776, the Virginia convention instructed its delegates to vote for independence. On June 7, Lee introduced his “resolution for independancy [sic].” The motion’s first section, adopted from the speech by Edmund Pendleton to the Virginia convention, declared: “That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.”

Debate on the motion was delayed until July due to the inability or unwillingness of some delegations to consider the issue. In the meantime, colonies were declaring themselves independent and adopting constitutions of their own. With events threatening to bypass Congress, a committee was selected to draft a declaration of independence. Lee was unavailable. He had hurried back to Virginia, apparently to attend to his wife who had fallen ill. That absence prevented him from participating in the debate on his resolution on July 2. He returned in time to sign the Declaration of Independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 73: Thomas Jefferson of Virginia: Secretary of State, Vice-President and President of the United States, Declaration of Independence Author and Signer – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Thomas Jefferson of Virginia: Secretary of State, Vice-President and President of the United States, Declaration of Independence Author and Signer

By the mid-1770s, Jefferson was ready to join the arguments of other patriots as a writer and statesman in the Second Continental Congress. In 1774, he authored a pamphlet entitled Summary View of the Rights of British America. He wrote that God was the author of natural rights inherent in each human being. The Americans were “a free people claiming their rights, as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate… the God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.”

William Rasmussen, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, William Rasmussen, Essay 74: Benjamin Harrison V of Virginia: State House Speaker, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: William Rasmussen, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Benjamin Harrison V of Virginia: State House Speaker, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

In the next decade, as more issues came to the fore, Harrison became more involved in the resistance. In 1770, he joined an association of Virginia lawmakers and merchants that boycotted British imports until the British Parliament repealed its tea tax. He was as well a sponsor of a bill that declared illegal any laws passed by Parliament without the consent of the colonists. In 1772, Harrison and Jefferson were among six Virginians who petitioned the King to end the importation of slaves from Africa. Although Harrison sided with the East India Company’s demand for payment when its tea was dumped into the Boston harbor in 1773, he condemned the Intolerable Acts that were the response of the British Parliament. He was among eighty-nine Virginia Burgesses who denounced the new policy—and invited colonies to convene a Continental Congress. It followed that Harrison was selected as one of Virginia’s delegates to that gathering.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 75: Thomas Nelson Jr. of Virginia: Planter, Brigadier General in the Continental Army, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Thomas Nelson Jr. of Virginia: Planter, Brigadier General in the Continental Army, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Thomas Nelson Jr. of Virginia gave his fortune and his health to further the cause of American Independence. When he and his fellow signers pledged “our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor,” the men of the Second Continental Congress took that risk seriously. Some paid more than others and Thomas Nelson Jr. may have paid more than all of them. He was never a healthy man, but the mission of independence took much of the health that he did have, resulting in an early death at the age of 50. He also sacrificed his family’s fortune, spending and donating it to help win the War of Independence. This was truly a man who risked and gave all so that we could live in the nation that we do today.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 76: Francis Lightfoot Lee of Virginia: Planter, House of Burgesses and Continental Congress Delegate, State Senator, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

Francis Lightfoot Lee of Virginia: Planter, House of Burgesses and Continental Congress Delegate, State Senator, and Declaration of Independence Signer

But Francis Lightfoot Lee, a planter born in 1734 in Westmoreland, Virginia, contemporarily known as Frank, the second-youngest of the Lee brothers, was a determined worker, someone who did things out of duty and a devotion to getting done whatever task lay before him. He didn’t seek the spotlight, but was seen as a tireless worker. A leader, certainly, but one who led by doing.

Jay McConville, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Jay McConville, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 77: Carter Braxton of Virginia: Planter, Merchant, House of Burgesses and Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Jay McConville, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Carter Braxton of Virginia: Planter, Merchant, House of Burgesses and Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer

From this auspicious beginning, one might assume that Carter led a happy and contented life of comfort. Yet his wealth did not shield him from tragedy. His mother died just a week following his birth, and his father passed away when Carter was only 13. He married Judith Robinson upon leaving the College of William and Mary after only one year, but sadly she also died after they had been married for only two years. Perhaps to ease his grief, he traveled to Europe and England where he learned a great deal about the rulers of his colonial home, knowledge and perspective that would inform his decisions when revolutionary fervor gripped the colonies. After two years in Europe, he returned, marrying a second time in 1760 to Elizabeth Corbin. It is reported that they had 16 children together.

Jeff Broadwater, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Jeff Broadwater, Essay 78: William Hooper of North Carolina: Lawyer, Salisbury Deputy Attorney General, Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Jeff Broadwater, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

William Hooper of North Carolina: Lawyer, Salisbury Deputy Attorney General, Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer

His service in the Fourth Provincial Congress of April 1776 only increased his frustration. He served on a committee that tried but failed to produce a new state constitution. As prospects for reconciliation with Great Britain evaporated, Hooper supported the Halifax Resolves, endorsing independence, but his presence at the North Carolina congress meant he missed the Continental Congress’s debate over the Declaration of Independence. He did, however, participate in the general signing of the document on August 2.

Jeff Broadwater, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Jeff Broadwater, Essay 79: Joseph Hewes of North Carolina: Merchant, State Legislature and Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Jeff Broadwater, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Joseph Hewes of North Carolina: Merchant, State Legislature and Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Hewes returned to Edenton in late November 1774, suffering from a fever, probably malaria, that would continue to plague him intermittently. He nevertheless remained active, serving on Edenton’s Committee of Safety, which had the responsibility for enforcing the Continental Association in Edenton. The outbreak of fighting at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts and King George III’s subsequent refusal to negotiate with the colonies undermined the position of moderates like Hewes and led him to act more aggressively. When Congress reconvened in May 1775, Hewes recruited two Presbyterian ministers to rally support for the American cause among Highland Scots in the North Carolina backcountry. Mainly Presbyterians, the Scots had long been estranged from the colony’s politically dominant English Anglican faction to their east. Hewes also served as secretary to Congress’s Naval Board and helped secure John Paul Jones’s commission in the Continental Navy.

Barb Zakszewski, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Barb Zakszewski, Essay 80: John Penn of North Carolina: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Board of War Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Barb Zakszewski, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

John Penn of North Carolina: Lawyer, Continental Congress Delegate, Board of War Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Penn served in the Continental Congress until 1780. During that time, Penn, a very zealous man when it came to the Colonies separating from England, clashed with other members of the Congress who were not as convinced. This included the President of the Congress, Henry Laurens. As it turned out, Mr. Penn and Mr. Laurens roomed together during this time. Mr. Laurens, who was much older than Penn and in disagreement with his views, challenged Penn to a duel. But the duel was canceled the morning of, as Mr. Penn suggested such an idea was just foolish. Mr. Laurens agreed and the duel was canceled.

Edward Lee, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Edward Lee, Essay 81: Edward Rutledge of South Carolina: Lawyer, Captain of Artillery in the Revolutionary War, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Edward Lee, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Edward Rutledge of South Carolina: Lawyer, Captain of Artillery in the Revolutionary War, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

As a delegate to the Congress, Rutledge initially opposed Virginian Richard Henry Lee’s June 1776 plan for independence, arguing that the time was not yet “ripe.” Persuaded that the urgency of independence and the actions of Parliament called for southerners like himself to line up in the pro-Revolution group, he argued that the vote by Congress be unanimous and became the first South Carolina delegate to affix his signature. His oratorical style was said to resemble Cicero.

Edward Lee, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Edward Lee, Essay 82: Thomas Heyward, Jr. of South Carolina: Lawyer, Judge, Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Edward Lee, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Thomas Heyward, Jr. of South Carolina: Lawyer, Judge, Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Heyward voiced early his opposition to British rule and the control being forced upon the colonies through such methods as the Stamp Act. Soon after becoming a member of the Continental Congress, Heyward signed the Declaration of Independence, standing with Richard Henry Lee’s Resolution for Independence. Disagreements about whether to support independence included a warning from his father that voting for it could result in being hung. Still, Thomas Heyward believed independence for the colonies was acting in good judgment. With a strong sense of duty, he took notice of the abuses upon his fellow countrymen by the British Crown, further solidifying his resolve to discuss and accomplish independence.

Edward Lee, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Edward Lee, Essay 83: Thomas Lynch, Jr. of South Carolina: Planter, Company Commander, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Edward Lee, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Thomas Lynch, Jr. of South Carolina: Planter, Company Commander, Second Continental Congress Delegate, and Declaration of Independence Signer

In South Carolina on the eve of the Revolution, Lynch enjoyed the life of a planter, farming and discussing politics, rather than practicing law as his father hoped he would along with becoming engaged in public life, after having received a good education and studying law. He allied himself with figures such as Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, Christopher Gadsden, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr. He was a staunch advocate of South Carolina’s right to form its own independent government, regardless of the wishes of the other British colonies. He found the talk by the British politicians distasteful toward the colonists which served to strengthen his views for supporting independence.

Edward Lee, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, Edward Lee, Essay 84: Arthur Middleton of South Carolina: Planter, Continental Congress Delegate, Militia and Council of Safety Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: Edward Lee, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Arthur Middleton of South Carolina: Planter, Continental Congress Delegate, Militia and Council of Safety Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Once settled back in South Carolina, Arthur became engaged in politics, interested in the activity of independence. His father, Henry Middleton, viewed negatively the colonies’ Loyalists and wanted his son to succeed him as a member of the Continental Congress to oppose the encroaching policies of the British. Due to Arthur being a vocal critic of England and Parliament’s actions, like his father, this led to the thirteen-member Council of Safety. He served on the council as a delegate of the First and Second Provincial Congresses, then succeeded his father as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1776. Though a man of great wealth and much to lose, with sober knowledge of the risk to his own life and that of his family, Arthur supported the cause of freedom, voting in favor of independence from Great Britain, leading him to add his signature to the Declaration of Independence.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 85: Button Gwinnett of Georgia: Merchant, Planter, Second Continental Congress Delegate, Council of Safety Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Button Gwinnett of Georgia: Merchant, Planter, Second Continental Congress Delegate, Council of Safety Member, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Gwinnett presented his credentials in Philadelphia on May 20, 1776. He served on some committees, but little is known about his participation in any debates on independence. Gwinnett did vote for the motion in support of independence, and he did sign the Declaration of Independence on August 2. Gwinnet returned to Georgia, probably hoping to re-gain the appointment to the battalion commander, but McIntosh was selected to remain in that position. Gwinnet was soon chosen to participate in a state constitutional convention that would draft the first of Georgia’s constitution. Once he arrived at the convention, Gwinnett was chosen as speaker. Most records of the debates at the convention have not survived to this day, but it appears that the final product was to Gwinnett’s liking. The new state constitution established relatively low property ownership requirements for voting, created a unicameral state legislature, and established a weak chief executive, elected by the legislature, who could not veto legislative actions. The new constitution also abolished the parish system of representation and created counties that would serve as administrative units of the state as well as a basis for representation in the legislature. The new document was approved in February of 1777. By that time, Gwinnett served on the Council of Safety, which assumed governmental power after the Provincial Congress adjourned. The president of the Council of Safety, Archibald Bulloch was the de facto chief executive. Bulloch died suddenly, late in that month. The Council of Safety selected Gwinnett to serve as temporary president. The only dissenting vote was cast by George McIntosh, the brother of Lachlan McIntosh.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 86: Lyman Hall of Georgia: Clergyman, Physician, Second Continental Congress Delegate, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

Lyman Hall of Georgia: Clergyman, Physician, Second Continental Congress Delegate, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

Lyman Hall was a multi-talented clergyman, physician, and statesman who served in the Second Continental Congress, signed the Declaration of Independence, and won state office in his adopted state of Georgia. Repeatedly, Hall faced personal and financial losses as a result of his service to his country and his state, but he emerged as a respected political figure in a politically fractious environment.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 87: George Walton of Georgia: Lawyer, Congressman, Council of Safety Member, State Supreme Court Chief Justice, Governor, Declaration of Independence Signer – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

George Walton of Georgia: Lawyer, Second Continental Congress Delegate, Council of Safety Member, State Supreme Court Chief Justice, Governor, and Declaration of Independence Signer

George Walton was born in Virginia sometime between 1740 and 1750. The exact date is not known. Walton’s father had died before his birth, and his mother died a few years later, so Walton was taken in by his father’s brother, who was also named George Walton. The elder Walton was not a poor man, but he had thirteen children of his own to raise, as well as those of his brother. When he was fifteen, the younger Walton was apprenticed as a carpenter, where he learned that trade. He was released from his apprenticeship while still a teenager, when he moved with an older brother to Savannah, Georgia. There, he became a clerk in an attorney’s office, and began to learn the law while on the job. By 1775, Walton had not only become a practicing attorney, but had also become one of the most sought-out and prosperous lawyers in Savannah. As his professional success grew, Walton became involved with the young Whigs opposing British rule in America.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 88: Weighing a Decisive Break, Preparing Defenses, and Why Some Founders Did Not Sign the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Weighing a Decisive Break, Preparing Defenses, and Why Some Founders Did Not Sign the Declaration of Independence

The deliberation about independence took shape over a decade of resistance against British taxes and tyranny. While some colonists spoke of a possible break with Great Britain, most considered themselves English and could not imagine living outside the empire. However, the war forced them to reconsider their ties with the British and provided a moral imperative to protect natural rights against a tyrannical government.

Michael P. Farris, 90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Michael P. Farris, 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 89: With a Firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence – Guest Essayist: Michael P. Farris, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

With a Firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence

In light of the common canard that most of the Founders were deists, it is important to note that this phraseology is utterly inconsistent with deism—a philosophy which contends that God created the world and then walked away and is unconcerned with present human actions. God is described as the “Supreme Judge of the World.” This acknowledges that God has universal standards and that He will hold all men accountable for their actions. This is not a disconnected, indifferent God. The founding generation widely believed that there were eternal consequences for improper actions during life. Thus, the signers of the Declaration were not merely willingly accepting the temporal consequences of their bold action, but they were effectively saying that they were willing to stand before the throne of God and accept His judgment of these actions.

90 in 90 2021, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, W.B. Allen, Ph.D. 11. Declaration of Independence, Essay 90: Best Friends: The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – Guest Essayist: William B. Allen, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, W. B. Allen PhD

Best Friends: The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution

This design of limited constitutionalism, further, was nothing less than imitating in human artifice the order of nature reflected in the powers of God affirmed in the
Declaration. God held the three powers of effective order, legislative, executive and judicial. He legislated “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God;” regarding humans he was the executor, for “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights;” and he was appealed to as “the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions.” God, in other words, united the three powers of effective order in his own person. He could do so precisely because he exists in an order above man and respecting which no “consent” to his rule could be demanded. No man is God’s equal, while every man is any king’s moral equal.

90 in 90 2021, Blog 11. Declaration of Independence, 2021 Declaration of Independence 90 Day Study Essay Schedule

90-Day Study Essay Schedule 2021

90 in 90 = 180! History Holds The Key To The Future! Our 11th 90 Day Study on the Declaration of Independence Launches February 15, 2021: Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor! Click “Read More” for the schedule. Click the button below to sign up for a daily essay to be emailed to you.
Explore our archives: Ten 90 Day Studies, archived and serachable on our website: 1156 Essays By 185 Scholars!

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Wilfred M. McClay 10. Dates in American History, Essay 01: Introduction: Recovering Our Legacy: The Many Uses of the American Past – Guest Essayist: Wilfred M. McClay, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Wilfred M. McClay

Introduction – Recovering Our Legacy: The Many Uses of the American Past

We Americans need to know our history. And we need to know it far better than we have in the past. We are not a people bound together primarily by blood and soil. Instead we are people with our origins in many bloods and many soils, linked by shared principles embodied in shared institutions, and embedded in a shared history, with its shared triumphs and shared sufferings. There is a growing danger that we have been failing to pass along that flame to our posterity, with untold consequences. We have neglected an essential element in the formation of good citizens when we fail to provide the young with an accurate, responsible, and inspiring account of their own country – an account that will inform and deepen their sense of identification with the land they inhabit and equip them for the privileges and responsibilities of citizenship.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 02: The Enterprising Colony, and Settling of Jamestown, Virginia on May 14, 1607 – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

The Enterprising Colony, and Settling of Jamestown, Virginia on May 14, 1607

The settlement of Virginia had entrepreneurial origins that developed only in fits and starts and after almost a decade of failure. The introduction of private property, freedom, self-government, and a capitalist ethos laid the foundations of a successful colony and shaped the colonists’ thinking. Those ideals rested uneasily with the development of slavery, and this contradiction of slavery and freedom would continue for more than two centuries. However, the founding ideals of America were established along the James in Virginia.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 03: July 30, 1619: Virginia House of Burgesses Convenes – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

July 30, 1619: Virginia House of Burgesses Convenes

In the first Federalist essay, Alexander Hamilton famously observes: It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. Reflection and choice or accident and force, which will it be? Fortunate indeed are those who get to choose.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 04: Signing of the Mayflower Compact on November 11, 1620 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

Signing of the Mayflower Compact on November 11, 1620

“In the name of God, amen. We whose names are under written … [h]aving undertaken for the Glory of God, and advancement of the christian [sic] faith, and the honour of our King and country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia; do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politick, for our better ordering and preservation, and furtherance of the ends aforesaid: And by virtue hereof, do enact, constitute and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and officers, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony ….”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Craig Bruce Smith 10. Dates in American History, Essay 05: May 28, 1754: Battle of Jumonville Glen Starts the French and Indian War – Guest Essayist: Craig Bruce Smith, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Craig Bruce Smith

May 28, 1754: Battle of Jumonville Glen Starts the French and Indian War

In a wooded clearing overlooking an imposing rock formation, roughly sixty-five miles outside modern day Pittsburgh, the face of North America would be irreparably altered. On May 28, 1754 this spot witnessed the first shot of the French and Indian War (or the Seven Years’ War around the world). The shot was fired under the order, or possibly even by the hand, of a twenty-two-year-old Virginian militia officer named George Washington. At the break of dawn and under the cover of the forest, British, French, and Native forces engaged in this brief (but globally impactful) battle that escalated the long-simmering tension over the contested lands of the Ohio Valley into a world war felt on five continents.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, David B. Kopel 10. Dates in American History, Essay 06: April 19, 1775 Battles of Lexington and Concord: The American Revolution Begins – Guest Essayist: David B. Kopel, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, David B. Kopel

April 19, 1775 Battles of Lexington and Concord: The American Revolution Begins

During the first six decades of the eighteenth century, the American colonies were mostly allowed to govern themselves. In exchange, they loyally fought for Great Britain in imperial wars against the French and Spanish. But in 1763, after the British and Americans won the French and Indian War, King George III began working to eliminate American self-government. The succeeding years saw a series of political crises provoked by the king and parliament. What turned the political dispute into a war was arms confiscation at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts, on April 19, 1775.

In 1774, the British government had realized that because armed Americans were so numerous, they could not be frightened into compliance with British demands. So in the latter months of 1774, the King and his Royal Governors in America instituted a gun control program. All firearms and ammunition imports to the American colonies were forbidden. At the governors’ command, British soldiers began raiding American armories, which stored firearms for militiamen who could not afford their own, and also held large quantities of gunpowder. Because the raids were accomplished peacefully in surprise pre-dawn maneuvers, they caused outrage, but nothing more. Both sides knew that if the British attempted to seize arms by force, the Americans would fight.

Jeff Truitt, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Jeff Truitt, Essay 07: October 13, 1775: Birth of the United States Navy – Guest Essayist: Jeff Truitt, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

October 13, 1775: Birth of the United States Navy

The game changing event of the American Revolution was the defeat of the English forces at Yorktown in 1781. This forced surrender occurred because the French fleet defeated the English fleet at Chesapeake and were thereby poised to annihilate the English columns with their powerful cannon. Command of the littoral waters enabled land-based forces to prevail, a pattern repeated often throughout history.

Quality Navy ships are expensive and by 1785, the Continental Navy had been completely disbanded. After a decade without a Navy, State-sponsored pirate regimes in North Africa prevented U.S. merchant vessels from engaging in free commerce in the Mediterranean. The Naval Act of 1794 created a standing Navy, featuring the commissioning of six technologically sophisticated vessels that could engage or outrun any ship it encountered.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 08: July 4, 1776: Congress Adopts the Declaration of Independence – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

July 4, 1776: Congress Adopts the Declaration of Independence

The adoption of the Declaration of Independence of “the thirteen united States of America” on July 4, 1776, formally ended a process that had been set in motion almost as soon as colonies were established in what became British North America. The early settlers, once separated physically from the British Isles by an immense ocean, in due course began to separate themselves politically, as well. Barely a decade after Jamestown was founded, the Virginia Company in 1619 acceded to the demands of the residents to form a local assembly, the House of Burgesses, which, together with a governor and council, would oversee local affairs. This arrangement eventually was recognized by the crown after the colony passed from the insolvent Virginia Company to become part of the royal domain. This structure then became the model of colonial government followed in all other colonies.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 09: Apple of Gold: The Declaration of Independence and American Principles – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Apple of Gold: The Declaration of Independence and American Principles

The natural rights republicanism continued to shape the American thinking and debate about independence. For example, a young Alexander Hamilton wrote in Farmer Refuted, “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sun beam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.”

In 1774, Jefferson had written the influential Summary View of the Rights of British North America. In that pamphlet, he described the natural rights basis of consensual republican government. The American colonists were “a free people claiming their rights, as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.” The colonists argued for the “rights which God and the laws have given equally and independently to all.” He concluded with a reflection on rights embedded in human nature: “The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, The Honorable David L. Robbins 10. Dates in American History, Essay 10: October 17, 1777 British Surrender at Saratoga: Turning Point of the American Revolutionary War – Guest Essayist: The Honorable David L. Robbins, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, The Honorable David L. Robbins

October 17, 1777 British Surrender at Saratoga: Turning Point of the American Revolutionary War

Most students of U.S. history know about the “Shot Heard ‘Round the World” that heralded the beginning of the American Revolution on April 19, 1775. The battles of Lexington and Concord, spurred on when British soldiers tried to confiscate the arms of the American colonists, were the first shots in the Revolutionary War. These battles which caused the British soldiers to retreat to Boston with heavy losses were the result of unrest by the colonialists from the harsh treatment from the British Crown. The battles showed the growing resistance to British rule and tyranny.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 11: July 9, 1778: States Begin Signing the Articles of Confederation – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

July 9, 1778: States Begin Signing the Articles of Confederation

The Articles were doomed by their perceived structural weakness. Numerous attempts to reform them had foundered on the shoals of the required unanimity of the states for amendments. Another factor that likely caused the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 to abandon its quest merely to amend the Articles were their complexity and prolixity, with grants of power followed by exceptions, restrictions, and reservations set out in excruciating detail. The Articles’ weak form of federalism was replaced by the stronger form of the Constitution of 1787, stronger in the sense that the latter represented a more clearly distinct entity of the United States, with its republican legitimacy derived from the same source as the component states, that is, the people.

Defenders of the Articles at the time correctly pointed out that this early constitution, drafted under intense pressure at a critical time in the country’s history and intended to deal foremost with the exigencies of war, had been remarkably successful. It was, after all, under this maligned plan that the Congress had formed commercial and military alliances, raised and disciplined a military force, and administered a huge territory, all while defeating a preeminent military and naval power to gain independence.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 12: October 19, 1781: British Surrender at Yorktown, Effectively Ending the Revolutionary War – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

October 19, 1781: British Surrender at Yorktown, Effectively Ending the Revolutionary War

The surrender of General Charles Cornwallis to General George Washington at Yorktown, Virginia, was the final battle of the American Revolution. Then, in 1783, the Treaty of Paris was signed after an appeal from the British for peace, and the American Revolutionary War was over.

In 1778, a full three years before his victory at Yorktown, General George Washington wrote: “The Hand of providence has been so conspicuous in all this, that he must be worse than an infidel that lacks faith, and more than wicked, that has not gratitude enough to acknowledge his obligations.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 13: December 23, 1783: George Washington Resigns His Military Commission – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

December 23, 1783: George Washington Resigns His Military Commission

In an example of unrivaled statesmanship, General George Washington resigned his military commission at the State House in Annapolis, Maryland on December 23, 1783 to return to his Mount Vernon, Virginia home as a private citizen. Washington’s resignation was pivotal for American history because he willingly gave up power. He later participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, and was unanimously elected president of the United States in 1789. He reluctantly accepted the presidency and rejected any form of kingship. In 1797, Washington again surrendered his position, allowing a fellow American to serve as president. The example Washington set for America’s republican form of government was that of a peaceful transfer of power, a requirement the nation would need to serve by leadership and freedom rather than dictatorship.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 10. Dates in American History, Essay 14: Humble Statesman: How George Washington’s Selfless Resignation Ensured Power Remained With the American People – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

Humble Statesman: How George Washington’s Selfless Resignation Ensured Power Remained With the American People

General Washington was given great powers by the 2nd Continental Congress. The civil and military control he received were similar to a military dictator. He could have simply grabbed power and served over the United States as an absolute ruler or an “American King.” There were also some who felt that this should be what Washington should do to maintain stability for the new government and nation. But, like the story of the Roman general, Cincinnatus, Washington gave his power back to the people, where he felt it belonged.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 15: July 13, 1787: Northwest Ordinance Provides a Process for Forming New States – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

July 13, 1787: Northwest Ordinance Provides a Process for Forming New States

In perhaps its most significant legislative action, the Congress of the Articles of Confederation passed the Northwest Ordinance on July 13, 1787. This landmark law was an act of institutional strength during a period of marked institutional weakness, a reminder of a national will that had been battered by fears of disunion, and a source of constitutional principles that defined parts of the fundamental charter that would replace the Articles a year later.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 16: The Northwest Ordinance and American Ideals – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

The Northwest Ordinance and American Ideals

Thomas Jefferson drafted the Ordinance of 1784, which was considered and adopted by the Congress. The land ordinance established the principles of making new territories entering into the Union equal to the original thirteen states and guaranteeing the new states a republican form of government.

Jefferson included a clause that would have forever banned slavery in the western territories, but it narrowly lost by a single vote. Reflecting on its failure, Jefferson wrote a few years later: “The voice of a single individual would have prevented this abominable crime; heaven will not always be silent; the friends to the rights of human nature will in the end prevail.”

The following year, Congress adopted the Land Ordinance of 1785 which specified how the land in the Northwest Territory would be disposed of and divided as a model of orderly western settlement. The ordinance stated that the land was to be surveyed and then divided into townships and farms to shape civil society and individual land ownership. Land purchases were to be paid to the national government to provide revenue, especially to help retire the national debt. Communities would establish public schools to educate the citizens in knowledge and the virtues of republican citizenship.

90 in 90 2021, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James D. Best 10. Dates in American History, Essay 17: September 17, 1787: Approval of the U.S. Constitution, Sent to the States for Ratification – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best

Happy Constitution Day! September 17, 1787: Approval of the U.S. Constitution, Sent to the States for Ratification

The Founding of this great nation was unique. Until 1776, with a few brief exceptions, world history was about rulers and empires. The American experiment shook the world. Not only did we break away from the biggest and most powerful empire in history, we took the musings of the brightest thinkers of the Enlightenment and implemented them. Our Founding was simultaneously an armed rebellion against tyranny, and a revolution of ideas—ideas that changed the world.

While the last members were signing, Franklin raised his voice. “Gentlemen, have you observed the half sun painted on the back of the President’s chair? Artists find it difficult to distinguish a rising from a setting sun. In these many months, I have been unable to tell which it was. Now, I’m happy to exclaim that it is a rising, not a setting sun.”

As the sentries threw open the doors, the delegates were assaulted by bright sunlight and a deafening roar. Hundreds of people cheered, clapped, and whistled at the sight of General George Washington framed by the great double doors of the State House. The sentries had skipped down the three steps and joined arms to hold back the surge of people. A rambunctious session on Saturday had informed Philadelphians that the convention had concluded its business.

As Franklin followed in Washington footsteps, the people continued to cheer and applaud. A woman leaned in to yell, “Dr. Franklin, what is it to be? A republic or a monarchy?”

His answer came in a firm, loud voice. “A republic—if you can keep it.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 18: April 30, 1789: Inauguration of George Washington as First President of the United States of America – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

April 30, 1789: Inauguration of George Washington as First President of the United States of America

Two weeks after the death of George Washington on December 14, 1799, his long-time friend General Henry “Light Horse Harry” Lee delivered a funeral oration to Congress that lauded the deceased as, “First in war- first in peace- and first in the hearts of his countrymen, he was second to none in the humble and endearing scenes of private life; pious, just, humane, temperate and sincere; uniform, dignified and commanding, his example was as edifying to all around him, as were the effects of that example lasting.”

By his prestige as head of state and his influence upon public opinion, he exerts a leverage upon those who are supposed to check and balance his power which often cancels their effectiveness.” Washington was keenly aware of his groundbreaking role and used events during his time in office to define the constitutional boundaries of Article II and to shape the office of the President from this “sketch.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Craig Bruce Smith 10. Dates in American History, Essay 19: Birth of the United States Army – Guest Essayist: Craig Bruce Smith, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Craig Bruce Smith

Birth of the United States Army

From the United States capitol of New York City’s Federal Hall, Congress passed one of the earliest acts of the seven-months-old federal government: a pivotal piece of legislation for the defense of the new nation and its people.

Passed on September 29, 1789 and approved by President George Washington, the act legally formalized a national army. In so doing, the some hundred congressmen and senators formally rejected the deep Anglo-American fear of a standing army assuming dictatorial control.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 20: August 4, 1790: Alexander Hamilton’s Debt Plan and the Foundation for American Capitalism – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

August 4, 1790: Alexander Hamilton’s Debt Plan and the Foundation for American Capitalism

On September 11, 1789, the Senate confirmed President George Washington’s appointment of Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton wasted no time and worked all weekend to address immediate financial concerns and spent the next few years formulating the financial policies to engage in nation-building for the new republic.

As one of the primary authors of the Federalist and as a key delegate to the New York Ratifying Convention, Hamilton had been instrumental in winning ratification of the new Constitution strengthening the national government. During the 1790s, he would use the constitutional authority of that new government to build a lasting republic.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 21: August 4, 1790 Debt Plan of Alexander Hamilton, America’s First Chief Operations Officer, Becomes Law – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

August 4, 1790: Debt Plan of Alexander Hamilton, America’s First Chief Operations Officer, Becomes Law

Alexander Hamilton was America’s first Chief Operations Officer (COO).

Along with James Madison, Hamilton crafted the best operating system ever devised in human history. The U.S. Constitution provided a framework for sharing power and resolving differences. Madison and Hamilton provided details for operationalizing the Constitution with their Federal Papers essays. These Papers remain integral to interpreting the original intent for court cases to this day.

America was blessed with George Washington, the most indispensable person in our nation’s history. However, Washington needed to augment his phenomenal leadership skills with Hamilton’s management acumen. During the American Revolution, Hamilton translated Washington’s military strategy into clear and concise orders to his commanders. Now as President, Washington needed Hamilton to translate the Founders’ vision, and his policies, into reality.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James D. Best 10. Dates in American History, Essay 22: December 15, 1791: Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution Are Ratified – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best

December 15, 1791: Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution Are Ratified

Because the Founders feared that a Bill of Rights might impede liberty due to sins of omission, the 9th Amendment provided that, “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.” The 10th Amendment further stated that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

These simple fifty words encapsulated the political philosophy of the Founders. Rights are not bestowed by the government, they are “endowed by their Creator” and reside with the people, and liberty depends on government operating within the restriction of enumerated powers delegated by a sovereign people.

Through the years, this sound philosophy has been diminished. The Supreme Court has succeeded in setting itself up as the arbiter of rights. So much so, many people have come to view government—specifically the Supreme Court—as the grantor and guarantor of rights. As the 9th Amendment states, rights exist that are not included in the first eight amendments, but the proper way to secure these rights from government interference is through laws at the state or national level or through the amendment process.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 23: Ratifying a Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution and the Safeguarding of America’s Freedoms – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Ratifying a Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution and the Safeguarding of America’s Freedoms

In 1789, James Madison spoke on the House Floor introducing amendments to the U.S. Constitution, an attempt to persuade Congress a Bill of Rights would protect liberty and produce unity in the new government. Opposed to a Bill of Rights at first, Madison stated that the rights of mankind were built into the fabric of human nature by God, and government had no powers to alienate an individual’s rights. Having witnessed the states violating them, Madison realized in order to safeguard America’s freedoms, Congress needed to remain mindful of their role never to take a position of power by force over the people they serve.

John Steele Gordon, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, John Steele Gordon, Essay 24: May 17, 1792: The Buttonwood Agreement and the New York Stock Exchange – Guest Essayist: John Steele Gordon, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

May 17, 1792: The Buttonwood Agreement and the New York Stock Exchange

Trading in the stock began on a when-issued basis in 1791. When it was issued in July of that year, it sold out almost immediately and began to rise, setting off the country’s first bull market. Short sales (the sale of borrowed stock in hopes of a decline in price), and puts and calls (the right to sell or buy a security at a certain price before a certain date) began at this time, greatly increasing the speculative possibilities.

Early trading took place in coffee houses and taverns (as well as on the street in good weather), but brokers also began holding auctions in their offices. In early 1792, John Sutton and his partner Benjamin Jay and several others decided to form a central auction at 22 Wall Street. Sellers would deposit the securities they wanted to sell and buyers would attend the auction and the auctioneers would take a commission on the sale price.

But the system soon collapsed as brokers would attend the auctions just to learn what the prices were and then offer the securities at a lower commission.

Joshua Schmid, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Joshua Schmid, Essay 25: March 14, 1794: Eli Whitney Receives a Patent for His Invention of the Cotton Gin – Guest Essayist: Joshua Schmid, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

March 14, 1794: Eli Whitney Receives a Patent for His Invention of the Cotton Gin

When one considers the great inventors of nineteenth-century America, few surpass Eli Whitney in both personal tenacity and the broader impact their works had on industrialization. Born on December 8, 1765 in Massachusetts, Whitney came of age during the American Revolution. As a boy, he enjoyed tinkering in his family’s workshop. One story tells that he stayed home on a Sunday to take apart his father’s watch while the rest of his family went to church. At the age of 12, Whitney created a violin—an incredible feat at such a young age. However, his tinkering was no mere hobby. The American Revolution was taking a toll on the colonial economy as men left their jobs to fight in the war or dedicated their trades to creating military equipment. Whitney heard that farmers around his home needed nails, and he soon created a forge to meet the demand.

Jeanne McKinney, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Jeanne McKinney, Essay 26: July 11, 1798: United States Officially Establishes U.S. Marine Corps, a Necessary Force for Freedom – Guest Essayist: Jeanne McKinney, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

July 11, 1798: United States Officially Establishes U.S. Marine Corps, a Necessary Force for Freedom

They are not only frightful and lethal when they need to be, but also serve humanitarian missions in natural disasters and disease outbreaks. They adapt to the calls of their country in any clime or place. Marines build vital global relationships with partners and allies who look to them for training. Because of their generous nature, they have helped other nations build their armies and security forces to be able to be ready, like them, for future conflicts. Marines have been one of the most enduring elements of the 20th and 21st centuries, shaping the world by winning its conflicts, securing stability, and building relationships among allies.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 27: April 30, 1803: The Louisiana Purchase Treaty Was Signed in Paris, Growing the United States – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

April 30, 1803: The Louisiana Purchase Treaty Was Signed in Paris, Growing the United States

The 1803 treaty signed in Paris brought a purchase by the United States for 828,000 square miles, doubling the nation’s size. Constitutional questions stirred disputes over how to best divide territory and keep the nation’s peace. Concurrently, the Louisiana Purchase helped sustain America’s growing need for agriculture, free flow of commerce along the Mississippi, and secure westward regions.

On June 12, 1823, Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to William Johnson: “On every question of construction, let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 28: May 14, 1804: Lewis and Clark Begin Exploration of the Missouri River – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

May 14, 1804: Lewis and Clark Begin Exploration of the Missouri River

On May 14, 1804, President Thomas Jefferson’s private secretary, Meriwether Lewis, and an army captain, William Clark, began an expedition exploring the territory stretching from the Mississippi River, along the Missouri River, all the way to the Pacific Ocean. But the origins of the expedition began long before this, even before Jefferson became president of the United States and well before the Louisiana Purchase took place. Only a few years after the Revolutionary War, shortly after sea captain Robert Gray had discovered the estuary of the Columbia River in present-day Oregon, Jefferson instructed Andre Michaux to “explore the country a[long] the Missouri, & thence Westwardly to the Pacific ocean.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 29: September 13-14, 1814: During the Siege of Fort McHenry, Francis Scott Key Writes America’s National Anthem, the Star Spangled Banner – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

September 13-14, 1814: During the Siege of Fort McHenry, Francis Scott Key Writes America’s National Anthem, the Star Spangled Banner

During the Napoleonic Wars of the early 1800s, the British Royal Navy stopped American ships and forcibly impressed their sailors into naval service after attempts by the Jefferson and Madison administrations to use embargoes and trade sanctions to compel British respect for freedom of the seas. In June 1812, Congress declared war to defend American national sovereignty from repeated British violations. Most of the battles were fought at sea and around the Great Lakes.

However, in August 1814, the British fleet arrived in the Chesapeake Bay and landed 4,000 troops who humiliated U.S. forces at Bladensburg, Maryland. The British marched into Washington, D.C. and burned the capital in revenge for the burning of York (Toronto). A few weeks later, British Admiral Alexander Cochrane and his officers decided to invade the nearby port-city of Baltimore because he thought the “town ought to be laid in ashes.”

David Head, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, David Head, Essay 30: February 22, 1819: The Adams-Onis Treaty Cedes Florida to the United States – Guest Essayist: David Head, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

February 22, 1819: The Adams-Onis Treaty Cedes Florida to the United States

February 22, 1819, was, John Quincy Adams recorded in his diary, “perhaps the most important day of my life.” On that day, the United States finalized a momentous treaty with Spain that acquired Florida for the United States and settled a border with Spain’s North American provinces that reached across the continent to give the United States a piece of Oregon on the Pacific Ocean.

The agreement was known officially as the Treaty of Amity, Settlement, and Limits Between the United States of America and His Catholic Majesty. Today, it’s more commonly called the Transcontinental Treaty, to emphasize its geographic scope, or it’s known as the Adams–Onís Treaty, after its two architects, Secretary of State Adams and Spanish minister plenipotentiary Luis de Onís.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 32: October 26, 1825: The Erie Canal is Completed – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

October 26, 1825: The Erie Canal is Completed

In 1817, construction on the Erie Canal began, opening in October of 1825. Initially a 363-mile waterway, 40 feet wide and four feet deep, it connected the Great Lakes and Atlantic Ocean flowing from the Hudson River at Albany to Lake Erie at Buffalo, New York. The canal increased transportation of bulk commercial goods at a much lower cost, widely expanded agricultural development, and brought settlers into surrounding states as the free flow of goods to the stretches of Northwest Territory were availed through the Appalachian Mountains.

On Friday, July 13, 1787, “James Madison’s Gang,” otherwise known as the Constitutional Convention, approved a motion stating that until completion of the first census, showing exactly how many residents each state contained, direct taxes to the states would be proportioned according to the number of representatives the state had been assigned in Congress. A short time later, Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania and Pierce Butler of South Carolina had a rather heated exchange over the issue of slavery and how to account for slaves in determining the state’s representation.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 33: March 4, 1829: Andrew Jackson is Inaugurated U.S. President and the Democratic Party is Formalized – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

March 4, 1829: Andrew Jackson is Inaugurated U.S. President and the Democratic Party is Formalized

Andrew Jackson started out as a lawyer and grew in politics. By the end of the War of 1812 between the United States and Britain, Jackson was a military hero of great influence. Former governor of Tennessee, he defeated John Quincy Adams in 1828, became the seventh president and first Democratic Party president, and helped found the Democratic Party.

James S. Humphreys, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, James S. Humphreys, Essay 34: May 28, 1830: President Andrew Jackson Signs the Indian Removal Act, Leads to Trail of Tears – Guest Essayist: James S. Humphreys, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

May 28, 1830: President Andrew Jackson Signs the Indian Removal Act, Leads to Trail of Tears

The Indian Removal Act passed the United States House of Representatives by a vote of 102 to 97 and the U.S. Senate by a vote of 28 to 19. It was signed by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. Jackson, a Tennessean, held slaves and belonged to the Democratic Party. He first attracted national attention during the War of 1812, when his forces decimated the Creek Indians and later successfully defended New Orleans against the onslaught of an experienced and well-trained British army. Jackson’s reputation as the hero of New Orleans assisted him in his rise to the presidency. He signed the Indian Removal Act fourteen months after assuming office.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 35: August 21, 1831: The Nat Turner Slave Rebellion Begins – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

August 21, 1831: The Nat Turner Slave Rebellion Begins

In early August 1831, Nat Turner, an African-American preacher and slave in Virginia, began planning and preparing a revolt against slavery. Beginning on August 21, Nat and others with him killed his master’s family, then mounted horses and continued the same on farms and elsewhere of slave owners and their families. After, the Virginia legislature received petitions urging the menace of slavery be dealt with as a cause of political and economic failure.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 36: April 21, 1836: The Battle of San Jacinto, Mexico Surrenders and Texas is Freed – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

April 21, 1836: The Battle of San Jacinto, Mexico Surrenders and Texas is Freed

In December 1832, Sam Houston went to Texas. He had been a soldier, Indian fighter, state and national politician, and member of the Cherokee. Beset by several failures, he sought a better life in Texas. On the way, Houston traveled to the San Antonio settlement with frontiersman and land speculator, Jim Bowie, to San Antonio.

During the 1820s, thousands of Americans had moved to Texas in search of land and opportunity. The Mexican republic had recently won independence and welcomed the settlers to establish prosperous settlements under leaders such as Stephen F. Austin. These settlers were required to become Mexican citizens, convert to Catholicism, and free their slaves. The prosperous colony thrived, but Mexican authorities suspected the settlers maintained their American ideals and loyalties and banned further immigration and cracked down on the importation of slaves in 1830.

David F. Forte, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, David F. Forte, Essay 37: January 27, 1838: Abraham Lincoln’s Lyceum Address on America’s Survival as a Nation – Guest Essayist: David F. Forte, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

January 27, 1838: Abraham Lincoln’s Lyceum Address on America’s Survival as a Nation

The tall, awkwardly boned, young Illinois legislator rose to speak. His thick hair, impervious to the comb, splayed over his head. The crowd at the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield leaned forward. They did not know it, but they were about to hear a prophet.

The title of Lincoln’s address was “The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions.” It could have been subtitled, “Will this nation survive?” From the moment his high-pitched voice began to address the audience, Lincoln’s passionate embrace of the Constitution set his life out on an arc that would carry him a quarter century later to Gettysburg when he asked whether a nation conceived in liberty “can long endure.” He was asking it even now.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 38: May 24, 1844: Samuel Morse Sends the First Telegraph Message – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

May 24, 1844: Samuel Morse Sends the First Telegraph Message

On May 24, 1844, Samuel Finley Breese Morse demonstrated his electro-magnetic telegraph in the capitol building in Washington, DC, by transmitting a message sent to a railway station in Baltimore, Maryland, approximately thirty-eight miles away. The message transmitted over the telegraph line was “What has God wrought?” a biblical passage from Numbers 23:23. This demonstration convinced many in both government and industry of the viability and usefulness of the new technology.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 39: January 24, 1848: The Gold Discovery in California, Gold Rush and Western Expansion – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

January 24, 1848: The Gold Discovery in California, Gold Rush and Western Expansion

On January 24, 1848, James Marshall was overseeing some workers digging a millrace for a sawmill for his employer, John Sutter, along a tributary in the American River in the hills near Yerba Buena (modern San Francisco). While he was inspecting the project, the morning sun reflected off shiny pieces of yellow metal. Curious, he gathered a few pieces to examine them and showed the workers.

The group ran some tests on the metal to determine if it were gold. They hammered the malleable metal into thin sheets and then cooked it in boiling lye that cleaned it. Marshall was sure that he found gold but kept his composure as he rode his horse to share the news with Sutter. They tested it again with nitric acid and then its density. He smiled and told the group (which included a female cook), “Boys, I believe I have found a gold mine.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Dan Morenoff 10. Dates in American History, Essay 40: February 2, 1848: Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Ends Mexican-American War, Annexes West – Guest Essayist: Dan Morenoff, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Dan Morenoff

February 2, 1848: Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Ends Mexican-American War, Annexes West

All this came to matter when James K. Polk won the Presidency in 1844. He had campaigned on a series of promises that, for our purposes, included: (a) annexing Texas; and (b) obtaining California (and parts of five (5) other modern states) from Mexico. , Part one came early and easily, as he negotiated Texas’s ascension to the Union in 1845. But when the Mexican government refused to meet with his emissary sent to negotiate the purchase of the whole northern part of their country, in pursuit of a fallback plan, President Polk sent an army south to resolve the remaining ambiguity of the Texas-Mexico border.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 41: July 14, 1853: United States Navy Commodore Matthew C. Perry Lands in Japan – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

July 14, 1853: United States Navy Commodore Matthew C. Perry Lands in Japan

Sent by President Millard Fillmore, Commodore Matthew C. Perry went on an expedition to Japan in 1853 to persuade, even pressure, Japan to end its policy of isolation and become open to trade and diplomacy with the United States. Japan signed a treaty with the U.S. in 1854, agreeing to trade and an American consulate. The Treaty of Kanagawa was the first by Japan with a Western nation. Among many accomplishments, Commodore Perry devised a naval apprentice system, assisted the Naval Academy, worked to develop naval officers to their fullest potentials, and helped found the New York Naval Lyceum.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 42: March 20, 1854: The Republican Party is Founded – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

March 20, 1854: The Republican Party is Founded

Bovay was an active Whig, but was disappointed in the Party’s disarray over slavery. He felt Party leaders had lost their way. Only a new party, uniting anti-slavery factions across the political spectrum would resolve the divisiveness facing America. In 1852, Bovay visited his friend, Horace Greeley, the editor of the New York Tribune, to discuss a new party. They agreed a new party deserved a new name – Republican. Launching this new party would have to wait until the Nebraska bill ignited wide-spread calls for strategic political change.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 43: May 30, 1854: The Kansas-Nebraska Act is Signed, Disrupting Years of Sectional Compromise – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

May 30, 1854: The Kansas-Nebraska Act is Signed, Disrupting Years of Sectional Compromise

The cascade of events leading to John Brown’s Harpers Ferry raid, and 700,000 dead on countless Civil War battlefields, began with a cynical ploy by Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas to help land speculators and political donors. America’s founding was an intricately crafted series of compromises and rules of engagement to balance regional interests. One of the fundamental points of conflict was slavery.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 44: March 6, 1857: Landmark Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott, Grounds of Race Whether Free or Slave – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

March 6, 1857: Landmark Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott, Grounds of Race Whether Free or Slave

In 1834, Dr. Emerson, an Army surgeon, took his slave Dred Scott from Missouri, a slave state, to Illinois, a free state, and then, in 1836, to Fort Snelling in Wisconsin Territory. The latter was north of the geographic line at latitude 36°30′ established under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 as the division between free territory and that potentially open to slavery. In addition, the law that organized Wisconsin Territory in 1836 made the domain free. Emerson, his wife, and Scott and his family eventually returned to Missouri by 1840. Emerson died in Iowa in 1843. Ownership of Scott and his family ultimately passed to Emerson’s brother-in-law, John Sanford, of New York.

With financial assistance from the family of his former owner, the late Peter Blow, Scott sued for his freedom in Missouri state court, beginning in 1846. He argued that he was free due to having resided in both a free state and a free territory. After some procedural delays, the lower court jury eventually agreed with him in 1850, but the Missouri Supreme Court in 1852 overturned the verdict. The judges rejected Scott’s argument, on the basis that the laws of Illinois and Wisconsin Territory had no extraterritorial effect in Missouri once he returned there.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 45: March 6, 1857: Landmark Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott, Grounds of Slave Status and Citizenship – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

March 6, 1857: Landmark Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott, Grounds of Slave Status and Citizenship

Dred Scott lost his appeal for a second reason, his status as a slave. The Court’s original, since-abandoned, plan had been to decide the whole suit on the basis of the Strader precedent that Scott was a slave because the Missouri Supreme Court had so found. That approach still could have been used to deal summarily with this issue in the eventual opinion. But Taney struck a bolder theme. He analyzed the effect of Scott’s residence in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory on his status. This allowed Taney to challenge more broadly the prevailing idea that the federal government could interfere with the movement of slavery throughout the nation. In the eyes of many, the Court’s institutional legitimacy suffered from its attempt to solve undemocratically such a deep public controversy about a fundamental moral issue.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 46: Half-Slave and Half-Free? The Injustice of the Dred Scott Decision – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

Half-Slave and Half-Free? The Injustice of the Dred Scott Decision

On the morning of March 6, Taney read the shocking opinion to the Court for nearly two hours. Taney, speaking for seven members of the Court, declared that all African-Americans—slave or free—were not U.S. citizens at the time of the founding and could not become citizens. He asserted that the founders thought that blacks were an inferior class of humans and “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect,” and no right to sue in federal court. This was not only a misreading of the history of the American founding but a gross act of injustice toward African Americans. Taney could have stopped there, but he believed this decision could end the sectional conflict over the expansion of slavery.

Taney’s understanding of American republican government was that only the white race enjoyed natural rights and consensual self-government. Abraham Lincoln continually attacked the decision in his speeches and debates. Lincoln stood for a Union rooted upon natural rights for all humans. He did not believe that the country could survive indefinitely “half slave, half free.” He argued that the Declaration of Independence “set up a standard maxim for free society” of self-governing individuals. Lincoln also opposed the Dred Scott decision because of its impact on democracy. If the Court’s majority gained the final say on political decisions, Lincoln thought “the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 47: October 16-18, 1859: The John Brown Raid, Catalyst for Civil War – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

October 16-18, 1859: The John Brown Raid, Catalyst for Civil War

On the evening of Oct. 16, 1859, John Brown and his raiders unleashed 36 hours of terror on the federal armory in Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia).

Brown’s raid marked a cataclysmic moment of change for America and the world. It ranks up there with Sept. 11, the Dec. 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, and the shots fired on Lexington Common and Concord Bridge during the momentous day of April 19, 1775. Each of these days marked a point when there was no turning back. Contributing events may have been prologue, but once these fateful days took place, America was forever changed.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James D. Best 10. Dates in American History, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best, 1860 Abraham Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address And Mathew Brady’s Lincoln Photo The Making Of The President

February 27, 1860: Abraham Lincoln Delivers His Cooper Union Address

Mr. President and fellow citizens of New York: –

The facts with which I shall deal this evening are mainly old and familiar; nor is there anything new in the general use I shall make of them. If there shall be any novelty, it will be in the mode of presenting the facts, and the inferences and observations following that presentation.

In his speech last autumn, at Columbus, Ohio, as reported in “The New-York Times,” Senator Douglas said:

“Our fathers, when they framed the Government under which we live, understood this question just as well, and even better, than we do now.”

I fully indorse this, and I adopt it as a text for this discourse. I so adopt it because it furnishes a precise and an agreed starting point for a discussion between Republicans and that wing of the Democracy headed by Senator Douglas. It simply leaves the inquiry: “What was the understanding those fathers had of the question mentioned?”

What is the frame of government under which we live?

The answer must be: “The Constitution of the United States.” That Constitution consists of the original, framed in 1787, (and under which the present government first went into operation,) and twelve subsequently framed amendments, the first ten of which were framed in 1789.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 10. Dates in American History, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, 1860 Abraham Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address And Mathew Brady’s Lincoln Photo The Making Of The President, Val Crofts

Abraham Lincoln Delivers Cooper Union Address and Sits for Portrait Believed to Solidify the First Republican Presidency

Abraham Lincoln traveled East in February of 1860. He was asked to deliver an address at the Cooper Institute in New York City on the momentous topic of the era, slavery. Lincoln had been a popular orator and politician in Illinois, but had yet to solidify himself as a national politician. His sense of humor, frontier charm and folksy wit appealed to his political and debate audiences in the West, but if he was going to attract a national following and possibly earn the nomination from the fledgling Republican Party as their presidential candidate, he needed to appeal to voters in different areas of the country.

Before he gave his Cooper Institute speech, Lincoln made his way to the New York studio of photographer, Matthew Brady. He was going to sit for a portrait that was going to introduce him to the American people. Brady’s portrait of Lincoln shows a confident, 51 year old Lincoln staring into the camera with his left hand resting on two books. He pulled his collar up in the portrait to partially obscure his long neck. He looks distinguished, but his hair is a bit disheveled as he stands ready to make arguably the most important speech of his life in a few hours.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 50: April 12, 1861: Battle of Fort Sumter, the Civil War Begins – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

April 12, 1861: Battle of Fort Sumter, the Civil War Begins

In November 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States. Shortly after, South Carolina became the first state to secede, doing so on December 20, 1860. Mississippi and Florida followed, with Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas joining them. On April 12, 1861, the Civil War officially began at the Battle of Fort Sumter.

The South Carolina militia bombarded Fort Sumter, an island fortification near Charleston, South Carolina. The Confederate Army had not yet officially formed. The attack began in the early morning hours of April 12, 1861, when Lieutenant Henry S. Farley fired a mortar round over Fort Sumter as a signal to the militia to begin firing on Fort Sumter. The militia, led by General P.G.T. Beauregard, had the upper hand. The Fort, led by Major Robert Anderson, had been designed and fortified to respond to, and defend against, naval attack, but over the ensuing battle proved to be no match for land bombardment.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 51: May 20, 1862: President Abraham Lincoln Signs the Homestead Act – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

May 20, 1862: President Abraham Lincoln Signs the Homestead Act

The Homestead Act of 1862 encouraged development of farming on land as homesteads for western expansion. Heads of households could receive up to 160 acres to farm for five years, or purchase the land after six months. If homesteaders were unable to farm successfully, the land would go back to the government to be offered again to another homesteader. Pro-slavery groups feared a homestead act would give more power to anti-slavery families moving to new territories of privatized land that could become free states, so they fought passage.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 52: July 2, 1862: President Abraham Lincoln Signs the Morrill Act Establishing Land Grant Colleges – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

July 2, 1862: President Abraham Lincoln Signs the Morrill Act Establishing Land Grant Colleges

On July 2, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed into law the Land-Grant Agricultural and Mechanical College Act, widely known today as the Morrill Act. The act was the culmination of work over many years by many legislators, notably the legislation’s author and chief sponsor, Justin Morrill of Vermont, who was one of the long-serving members of Congress during the 19th century. Congress had passed an earlier version of Morrill’s bill in 1857, but the bill was vetoed by President James Buchanan. An earlier bill sponsored by Henry Clay that would have used federal land revenues to support education and internal improvement was also vetoed by President Andrew Jackson. In each veto case, an argument was made that the federal government had no business involving itself in educational matters or other issues that were properly the province of state governments.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 53: September 17, 1862: Battle of Antietam Prompts the Emancipation Proclamation and Ends Potential European Intervention in the Civil War – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

September 17, 1862: Battle of Antietam Prompts the Emancipation Proclamation and Ends Potential European Intervention in the Civil War

America’s bloodiest day was also the most geopolitically significant battle of the Civil War. On October 17, 1862, twelve hours of battle along the Antietam Creek, near Sharpsburg, Maryland, resulted in 23,000 Union and Confederate dead or wounded. Its military outcome was General Robert E. Lee, and his Army of Northern Virginia, retreating back into Virginia. Its political outcome reshaped global politics and doomed the Southern cause.

The importance of Antietam begins with President Abraham Lincoln weighing how to characterize the Civil War to both domestic and international audiences. Lincoln chose to make “disunion” the issue instead of slavery. His priority was retaining the border states (Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri) within the Union.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 54: The Battle of Antietam and the Emancipation Proclamation – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

The Battle of Antietam and the Emancipation Proclamation

President Abraham Lincoln faced an important decision point in the summer of 1862. Lincoln was opposed to slavery and sought a way to end the immoral institution that was at odds with republican principles. However, he had a reverence for the constitutional rule of law and an obligation to follow the Constitution. He discovered a means of ending slavery, saving the Union, and preserving the Constitution.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Daniel Cotter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 55: July 4, 1863: Vicksburg Surrenders, Completing the Anaconda Plan to Encircle the South – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter

July 4, 1863: Vicksburg Surrenders, Completing the Anaconda Plan to Encircle the South

The Anaconda Plan of the Civil War, crafted by U.S. General-in-Chief Winfield Scott, was designed to split and defeat the Confederacy by closing in on the coasts east and south, control the Mississippi River, then attack from all sides. Union Major General Ulysses S. Grant pressed through to take Vicksburg, Mississippi, get the final Confederate strongholds and control the Mississippi River. President Abraham Lincoln believed taking Vicksburg was the key to victory. The Battle at Vicksburg would be the longest military campaign of the Civil War. Vicksburg was surrendered on July 4, 1863.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 10. Dates in American History, Essay 56: July 22, 1864: Fall of Atlanta and Assurance of President Abraham Lincoln’s Re-election – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

July 22, 1864: Fall of Atlanta and Assurance of President Abraham Lincoln’s Reelection

Abraham Lincoln is usually considered one of our nation’s greatest presidents. But, what many people may not know is that Lincoln was not a very popular president during his first term and he nearly was not reelected in 1864. For many months leading into the presidential election of that year, Lincoln resigned himself to a simple fact that he was not going to be reelected. He told a visitor to the White House in the fall of 1864, “I am going to be beaten…and unless some great change takes place, badly beaten.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 57: April 9, 1865: Confederate General Robert E. Lee Surrenders at Appomattox, Ending the Civil War, Beginning the Nation’s Healing – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

April 9, 1865: Confederate General Robert E. Lee Surrenders at Appomattox, Ending the Civil War, Beginning the Nation’s Healing

On March 4, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln delivered his Second Inaugural Address that was a model of reconciliation and moderation for restoring the national Union. He ended with the appeal:

“With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 58: April 15, 1865: President Abraham Lincoln Assassinated, Changes Postwar Politics – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

April 15, 1865: President Abraham Lincoln Assassinated, Changes Postwar Politics

Only five days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, ending the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated in a theater in Washington, D.C. John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate supporter, shot the president who succumbed to his wounds the next day. President Andrew Johnson took Lincoln’s place, and was less supportive of Lincoln’s anti-slavery policies, diluting the abolition of slavery Lincoln envisioned. Johnson was in favor of policies that further disenfranchised free blacks, setting political policies that would weaken the nation’s unity.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 10. Dates in American History, Essay 59: December 6, 1865: The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is Ratified, Abolishing Slavery – Guest Essayist: Kyle A. Scott, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD

December 6, 1865: The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is Ratified, Abolishing Slavery

Notwithstanding the controversy over the causes of the U.S. Civil War, we do know that one of the outcomes was ending slavery through the Thirteenth Amendment. Congress passed the proposed Thirteenth Amendment on January 31, 1865 and it was subsequently ratified on December 6, 1865 by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Upon its ratification, the Thirteenth Amendment made slavery unconstitutional.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 60: September 5, 1867: The First Texas Cattle Shipped From Abilene – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

September 5, 1867: The First Texas Cattle Shipped From Abilene

On September 5, 1867, the first Texas cattle were shipped from the railhead in Abilene, Kansas, with most of the livestock ending their destination in a slaughterhouse in Chicago, Illinois. These cattle made a long, none too pleasant journey from south Texas to central Kansas. Their hardships were shared by cowboys and cattlemen who drove their herds hundreds of miles to find a better market for their livestock. For almost two decades, cattle drives from Texas were undertaken by beef producers who found that the northern markets were much more lucrative than those they had been dealing with back home. These drives ended after a combination of economic, legal, and technological changes made the long drives impractical or infeasible.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, David J. Shestokas, J.D. 10. Dates in American History, Essay 61: October 18, 1867: Signing of the Alaska Treaty, The Alaska Purchase – Guest Essayist: David Shestokas, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, David J. Shestokas J.D.

October 18, 1867: Signing of the Alaska Treaty, The Alaska Purchase

Russia has not always been a mortal enemy in the American story. America’s Founders reached out to Russia in our earliest days. In December, 1780, the United States sent its first envoy to St. Petersburg, then Russia’s capital. The envoy, Francis Dana, brought a secretary with him. The secretary was fourteen-year-old John Quincy Adams. Dana could speak no word of French, the language of the Russian court, and so John Adams had lent Dana his son, who was fluent in French. Young John Quincy thus became a diplomatic interpreter.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Brian J. Pawlowski 10. Dates in American History, Essay 62: May 10, 1869: A Golden Spike Completes the Transcontinental Railroad and Unites America – Guest Essayist: Brian Pawlowski, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Brian J. Pawlowski

May 10, 1869: A Golden Spike Completes the Transcontinental Railroad and Unites America

The stories of our history connect generations across time in remarkable ways. The same giddy fascination Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant held for the potential of the railroad in the nineteenth century is present in countless children today. They tear through books like Locomotive by Brian Floca until the pages are nearly torn from constant re-reading. It is a wonderful book that conveys both the magnitude and the majesty of the transcontinental railroad in an accessible way. A more thorough treatment of the railroad, Nothing in the World Like It: The Men Who Built the Transcontinental Railroad 1863-1869, written by historian Stephen Ambrose perhaps summarized it best by noting that, “Next to winning the Civil War and abolishing slavery, building the first transcontinental railroad, from Omaha, Nebraska, to Sacramento, California, was the greatest achievement of the American people in the 19th century.” Making this achievement all the more remarkable is the fact that it was hatched as the Civil War was raging: a project to connect a continent that was at war with itself.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 63: March 1, 1872: Yellowstone Becomes the First National Park and Begins America’s Park System – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

March 1, 1872: Yellowstone Becomes the First National Park and Begins America’s Park System

Our National Parks are the most visible manifestation of why America is exceptional. America’s Parks are the physical touchstones that affirm our national identity. These historical Parks preserve our collective memory of events that shaped our nation and the natural Parks preserve the environment that shaped us. National Parks are open for all to enjoy, learn, and contemplate. This concept of preserving a physical space for the sole purpose of public access is a uniquely American invention. It further affirms why America remains an inspiration to the world. On March 1, 1872, President Ulysses S. Grant signed the law creating Yellowstone as the world’s first National Park.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 64: February 14, 1876: Alexander Graham Bell Files His Patent for a Telephone, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

February 14, 1876: Alexander Graham Bell Files His Patent for a Telephone

An attorney representing Alexander Graham Bell and his business partner, Gardiner Hubbard, filed a patent application for an invention entitled an “Improvement in Telegraphy” on February 14, 1876. That same day, Elisha Gray, a prominent inventor from Highland Park, Illinois, had applied for a patent caveat for a similar invention from the same office. On March 7, Bell’s patent was approved by the patent office and the battle over the rights to the invention that we now know as the telephone began. The eventual outcome would shape the development of a major industry and the opportunities for communication and social interaction for the entire country.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 65: June 25-26, 1876: Custer and the Battle of Little Bighorn – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

June 25-26, 1876: Custer and the Battle of Little Bighorn

In the mid-nineteenth century, the providential idea of Manifest Destiney drove Americans to move west. They traveled along various overland trails and railroads to Oregon, California, Colorado, and the Dakota Territory in search of land and gold. Native Americans who lived and hunted in the West were alarmed at white encroachment on their lands, which were usually protected by treaties. The conflict led to several violent clashes throughout the West.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Dan Morenoff 10. Dates in American History, Essay 66: March 2, 1877: The President Rutherford B. Hayes Electoral Compromise and End of Southern Reconstruction – Guest Essayist: Dan Morenoff, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Dan Morenoff

March 2, 1877: The President Rutherford B. Hayes Electoral Compromise and End of Southern Reconstruction

Usually, breaking down history into chapters requires imposing arbitrary separations. Every once in a while, though, the divisions are clear and real, providing a hard-stop in the action that only makes sense against the backdrop of what it concludes, even if it explains what follows. For reasons having next-to-nothing to do with the actual candidates,[1] […]

Paul Israel Ph.D, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Paul Israel Ph.D, Essay 67: August 12, 1877: Thomas Edison Invents the Phonograph – Guest Essayist: Paul Israel, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

August 12, 1877: Thomas Edison Invents the Phonograph

In mid-July 1877, while working to develop an improved telephone for the Western Union Telegraph Company, Thomas Edison conceived the idea of recording and reproducing telephone messages. Edison came up with this extraordinary idea because he thought about the telephone as a form of telegraph, even referring to it as a “speaking telegraph.” Thus, on July 18, he tried an experiment with a telephone “diaphragm having an embossing point & held against paraffin paper moving rapidly.” Finding that sound “vibrations are indented nicely” he concluded, “there’s no doubt that I shall be able to store up & reproduce automatically at any future time the human voice perfectly.”

Paul Israel Ph.D, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Paul Israel Ph.D, Essay 68: November 4, 1879: Thomas Edison Invents the Electric Light, Files Patent – Guest Essayist: Paul Israel, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

November 4, 1879: Thomas Edison Invents the Electric Light, Files Patent

By the time Thomas Edison began his effort to develop an incandescent electric light in September 1878, researchers had been working on the problem for forty years. While many of them developed lamps that worked in the laboratory and for short-term demonstrations, none had been able to devise a lamp that would last in long-term commercial use. Edison was able to succeed where others had failed because he understood that developing a successful commercial lamp also required him to develop an entire electrical system. With the resources of his laboratory, he and his staff were able to design not only a commercially successful lamp but the system that made it possible.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Val Crofts 10. Dates in American History, Essay 69: December 29, 1890: The Wounded Knee Massacre, Also Known as the Battle of Wounded Knee – Guest Essayist: Val Crofts, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

December 29, 1890: The Wounded Knee Massacre, Also Known as the Battle of Wounded Knee

The Massacre at Wounded Knee, part of the Ghost Dance War, marked the last of the Indian Wars and the end of one of the bloodiest eras in American History, the systematic and deliberate slaughter of Native American peoples and their way of life. It was an American Holocaust. During a 500 year period, approximately 100,000,000 Native Americans were killed as citizens of the United States pushed West in the name of manifest destiny and destroyed the Native American territories that had been their home for thousands of years. These events will never take a place on the front of our history books, but they must never lose their place in our national memory.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay 70: February 15, 1898: Battleship Maine Blows Up, Leads to the Spanish-American War and America Enters the World Stage – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Joerg W. Knipprath

February 15, 1898: Battleship Maine Blows Up, Leads to the Spanish-American War and America Enters the World Stage

On February 15, 1898, an American warship, U.S.S. Maine, blew up in the harbor of Havana, Cuba. A naval board of inquiry reported the following month that the explosion had been caused by a submerged mine. That conclusion was confirmed in 1911, after a more exhaustive investigation and careful examination of the wreck. What was unclear, and remains so, is who set the mine. During the decade, tensions with Spain had been rising over that country’s handling of a Cuban insurgency against Spanish rule. The newspaper chains of William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer had long competed for circulation by sensationalist reporting. The deteriorating political conditions in Cuba and the harshness of Spanish attempts to suppress the rebels provided fodder for the newspapers’ “yellow” journalism. Congress had pressured the American government to do something to resolve the crisis, but neither President Grover Cleveland nor President William McKinley had taken the bait thus far.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 71: February 15, 1898: Explosion of Battleship Maine, the Spanish-American War and American Foreign Policy – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

February 15, 1898: Explosion of Battleship Maine, the Spanish-American War and American Foreign Policy

In late January 1898, President William McKinley dispatched the U.S.S. Maine to Cuban waters to protect American citizens and business investments during ongoing tensions between Spain and its colony, Cuba. The event eventually sparked a war that dramatically culminated a century of expansion and led Americans to debate the purposes of American foreign policy at the dawn of the twentieth century.

Events only ninety miles from American shores were increasingly involving the United States in Cuban affairs during the late 1890s.
Cuban revolutionaries had fought a guerrilla war against imperialist Spain starting in 1895, and Spain had responded by brutally suppressing the insurgency. General Valeriano Weyler, nicknamed “the butcher,” forced Cubans into relocation camps to deny the countryside to the rebels. Tens of thousands perished, and Cuba became a cause célèbre for many Americans.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 72: December 17, 1903: Wright Brothers Make the First Powered Aircraft Flight – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

December 17, 1903: Wright Brothers Make the First Powered Aircraft Flight

During the summer of 1896, twenty-five-year-old Orville Wright was recovering from typhoid fever in his Dayton, Ohio home. His brother, Wilbur Wright, was reading to Orville accounts of a German glider enthusiast named Otto Lilienthal who was killed in a crash flying his glider. The brothers started reading several books about bird flight and even applying the mechanics of it to powered human flight.

Despite the dreams of several visionaries who were studying human flight, the Washington Post proclaimed, “It is a fact that man can’t fly.” The Wright Brothers were amateurs who might just be able to prove the newspaper wrong. They had tinkered with mechanical inventions since they were boys. They had owned a printing press and now a bicycle shop and were highly skilled mechanics. They did not have the advantages of great wealth or a college education, but they had excellent good work habits and perseverance. They were enthusiastically dedicated and disciplined to achieve their goal.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 10. Dates in American History, Essay 73: April 8, 1913: Seventeenth Amendment is Ratified Allowing for the Direct Election of Senators – Guest Essayist: Kyle A. Scott, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD

April 8, 1913: Seventeenth Amendment is Ratified Allowing for the Direct Election of Senators

The Seventeenth Amendment was passed by Congress May 13, 1912 and ratified on April 8, 1913. Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan certified the ratification on May 31, 1913. Once the Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, citizens had the right to directly cast ballots for their state’s two senators. The Amendment changed Article I, Section 3, clauses 1 and 3 of the Constitution that had previously stipulated senators were to be elected by state legislatures. By allowing for the direct election of senators, a barrier was removed between the people and the government that moved the U.S. closer to democracy and away from a republican form of government.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 74: Consequences of Ratifying the Seventeenth Amendment Providing for the Direct Election of Senators – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

Consequences of Ratifying the Seventeenth Amendment Providing for the Direct Election of Senators

In 1788, as the United States Constitution was adopted, senators would be elected by state legislatures to protect the states from the federal government increasing its own power. Problems related to the election of senators later resulted in lengthy senate vacancies. A popular vote movement began as a solution, but it failed to consider importance of separation of powers as designed by the Framers to protect liberty and maintain stability in government. The popular vote was an attempt to hamper the more deliberative body that is the United States Senate, and succumb to the more passionate, immediate will of the people, so on April 8, 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted.

Can a state, one of the United States, be guilty of “shooting itself in the foot?” How about multiple states? How about thirty-six states all at once? Not only can they be, I believe they have been guilty, particularly as it regards the Seventeenth Amendment. Let me explain.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Amanda Hughes, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 75: August 15, 1914: Opening of the Panama Canal – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes

August 15, 1914: Opening of the Panama Canal

Prior to World War I, oceanic travel between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans had to route dangerous passages around southern South America. Considerations for a way to connect the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific were present for centuries. More recent among these include survey expeditions Ulysses S. Grant in 1869, who wrote as an Army Captain in 1852 of disease and other tragedies during military travels while crossing the Isthmus of Panama, “The horrors of the road in the rainy season are beyond description.” A survey by Grant included Panama where it was found that the current route of the Panama Canal was nearly the same as what was proposed by Grant’s survey.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay 76: March 3, 1917: Germany Admits to Authoring the Zimmermann Telegram, America Enters World War I – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

March 3, 1917: Germany Admits to Authoring the Zimmermann Telegram, America Enters World War I

On March 3, 1917, 162 words changed the course of World War I and the history of the 20th Century. Germany officially admitted to sending the “Zimmermann Telegram,” which exposed a complex web of international intrigue, to keep America out of World War I. It was this, and not the sinking of the Lusitania on May 7, 1915, that led to the U.S. entering the European war.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 77: “Make the World Safe for Democracy”: President Woodrow Wilson and American Intervention in World War I – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

“Make the World Safe for Democracy”: President Woodrow Wilson and American Intervention in World War I

Americans have long held the belief that they are exceptional and have a providential destiny to be a “city upon a hill” as a beacon for democracy for the world. Unlike the French revolutionaries who believed that they were bound to destroy monarchy and feudalism everywhere, the American revolutionaries laid down the principle of being an example for the world instead of imposing the belief on other countries.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, The Honorable Michael Warren 10. Dates in American History, Essay 78: August 18, 1920: Nineteenth Amendment is Ratified, Women Gain the Right to Vote – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Michael Warren, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, The Honorable Michael Warren

August 18, 1920: Nineteenth Amendment is Ratified, Women Gain the Right to Vote

Before outbreak of the American Revolution, colonies were deeply embedded in the patriarchal traditions and customs of the entire world. All cultures and civilizations had placed women in a subordinate position in the political and social realm. However, the Declaration of Independence raised the consciousness of at least some women and men about the inequality that was embedded in the legal and cultural regimes. Women became serious contributors to the American Revolution war effort, and some, such as Abigail Adams (wife of Colossus of Independence and President John Adams) questioned why they should not be entitled to equality declared in the Declaration.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, James C. Clinger 10. Dates in American History, Essay 79: September 3, 1928: Philo Farnsworth Transmits the First Electronic Television Broadcast – Guest Essayist: James C. Clinger, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, James C. Clinger

September 3, 1928: Philo Farnsworth Transmits the First Electronic Television Broadcast

An admirer of inventors Bell, Edison, and Einstein’s theories, scientist and inventor Philo T. Farnsworth designed the first electric television based on an idea he sketched in a high school chemistry class. He studied and learned some success was gained with transmitting and projecting images. While plowing fields, Farnsworth realized television could become a system of horizontal lines, breaking up images, but forming an electronic picture of solid images. Despite attempts by competitors to impede Farnsworth’s original inventions, in 1928, Farnsworth presented his idea for a television to reporters in Hollywood, launching him into more successful efforts that would revolutionize moving pictures.

John Steele Gordon, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 80: October 29, 1929: Black Tuesday, Stock Market Crash – Guest Essayist: John Steele Gordon, John Steele Gordon, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

October 29, 1929: Black Tuesday, Stock Market Crash

Wall Street, because it tries to discern future values, is usually a leading indicator. It began to recover, for instance, from the financial debacle of 2008 in March of the next year. But the economy didn’t begin to grow again until June of 2009. But sometimes Wall Street separates from the underlying economy and loses touch with economic reality. That is what happened in 1929 and brought about history’s most famous stock market crash.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 81: March 4, 1933: President Franklin D. Roosevelt is Inaugurated, Begins His “Hundred Days” of Government Expansion – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

March 4, 1933: President Franklin D. Roosevelt is Inaugurated, Begins His “Hundred Days” of Government Expansion

In 1992, United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor enunciated an axiomatic principle of constitutional governance, that the Constitution “protects us from our own best intentions,” dividing power precisely so that we might resist the temptation to concentrate that power as “the expedient solution to the crisis of the day.” It is a sentiment that echoes through American history, as there has been a constant “push-pull” between the demands of the populace and the divisions and restrictions on power as laid out by the Constitution.

Joshua Schmid, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 82: December 7, 1941: Japan Attacks Pearl Harbor, America Enters World War II – Guest Essayist: Joshua Schmid, Joshua Schmid, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

December 7, 1941: Japan Attacks Pearl Harbor, America Enters World War II

The morning of December 7, 1941 was another day in paradise for the men and women of the U.S. armed forces stationed at the Pearl Harbor Naval Base on Oahu, Hawaii. By 7:30 am, the air temperature was already a balmy 73 degrees. A sense of leisure was in the air as sailors enjoyed the time away from military duties that Sundays offered. Within the next half hour, the serenity of the island was shattered. Enemy aircraft streaked overhead, marked only by a large red circle. The pilots—who had been training for months for this mission—scanned their surroundings and set their eyes on their target: Battleship Row. The eight ships—the crown of the United States’ Pacific fleet—sat silently in harbor, much to the delight of the oncoming Japanese pilots, who began their attack.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 83: August 6, 1945: America Drops Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima, Nuclear Age Begins – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

August 6, 1945: America Drops Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima, Nuclear Age Begins

The fall of 1939 saw dramatic changes in world events that would alter the course of history. On September 1, 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland to trigger the start of World War II but imperial Japan had been ravaging Manchuria and China for nearly a decade. Even though the United States was officially neutral in the world war, President Franklin Roosevelt had an important meeting in mid-October.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, The Honorable Don Ritter, Essay 84: June 24, 1948: The Berlin Airlift, Cold War Begins – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

June 24, 1948: The Berlin Airlift, Cold War Begins

Stalin’s chess move was to starve the citizens of the city by cutting off their food supply, their electricity, and their coal to heat homes, power remaining factories and rebuild. His plan also was to make it difficult to resupply allied military forces. This was a bold move to grab West Berlin for the communists. Indeed, there were some Americans and others who felt that Germany, because of its crimes against humanity, should never again be allowed to be an industrial nation and that we shouldn’t stand up for Berlin. But that opinion did not hold sway with President Truman. What Stalin and the Soviet communists didn’t count on was the creativity, ingenuity, perseverance and capacity of America and its allies.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, The Honorable Don Ritter, Essay 85: December 2, 1948: Whittaker Chambers Exposes Failure of Communism and Alger Hiss as a Spy With Pumpkin Papers – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

December 2, 1948: Whittaker Chambers Exposes Failure of Communism and Alger Hiss as a Spy With Pumpkin Papers

When Time Magazine was at its heyday and the dominant ‘last word’ in American media, over a ten-year period, Whittaker Chambers was its greatest writer and editor. He was a founding editor of National Review along with William F. Buckley. He received the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously from President Ronald Reagan in 1984. His memoir, Witness, is an American classic. The Hiss case is seminal in the history of the Cold War and its impact on America because it led to the taking sides politically on the Left and on the Right, a surge in anti-communism on the Right and the reaction to anti-communism on the Left. At the epicenter of the saga is Whittaker Chambers.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 86: June 25, 1950: North Korean Forces Invade South Korea, Korean War Begins – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

June 25, 1950: North Korean Forces Invade South Korea, Korean War Begins

World War II ended in 1945 but the ideological imperative of Soviet communism’s expansion did not. By 1950, the Soviet Union (USSR) had solidified its empire by conquest and subversion in all Central and Eastern Europe. But to Stalin & Co., there were other big fish to fry. At the Yalta Conference in February 1945 between Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill, the USSR was asked to participate in ending the war in the Pacific against Japan. Even though Japan’s defeat was not in doubt, the atom bomb would not be tested until July and it was not yet known to our war planners if it would work.

An invasion of Japan, their home island, was thought to mean huge American and allied casualties, perhaps half a million, a conclusion reached given the tenacity which Japanese soldiers had defended islands like Iwo Jima and Okinawa. So much blood was yet to be spilled… they were fighting to the death. The Soviet Red Army, so often oblivious to casualties in their onslaught against Nazi Germany, would share in the burden of invasion of Japan.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 87: June 19, 1953: Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Spies for the Soviet Union, Executed – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

June 19, 1953: Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Spies for the Soviet Union, Executed

Little focused the public’s mind in the early 1950s like the atom bomb and the potential for vast death and destruction in the event of nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Who can forget the classroom drills where students dropped to the floor and hid under their desks ostensibly to reduce exposure to an exploding atomic bomb? It was a prevailing subject of discussion amongst average people as well as elites in government, media and the arts.

90 in 90 2021, Noah Griffin, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog Noah Griffin, 10. Dates in American History, Essay 88: Juneteenth: A Poem – Guest Essayist: Noah Griffin, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Juneteenth – A Poem By Noah Griffin

Juneteenth’s a celebration of Liberation Day
When word of emancipation reached Texas slaves they say.
In sorrow were we brought here to till a harvest land.
We live and died and fought here
‘Til freedom was at hand.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Dan Morenoff 10. Dates in American History, Essay 89: May 17, 1954: Brown v. Board of Education, the Courts, Society, and Jim Crow – Guest Essayist: Dan Morenoff, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Dan Morenoff

May 17, 1954: Brown v. Board of Education, the Courts, Society, and Jim Crow

Between 1865 and 1876, Congress sought to make good the Union’s promises to the freedmen emancipated during the war. In the face of stiff, violent resistance by those who refused to accept the war’s verdict, America amended the Constitution three (3) times, with: (a) the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery; (b) the Fourteenth Amendment: (i) affirmatively acting to create and bestow American citizenship on all those born here, (ii) barring states from “abridg[ing] the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States[,]” and (iii) guaranteeing the equal protection of the laws; and (c) the Fifteenth Amendment barring states from denying American citizens the right to vote “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Toward the same end, Congress passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875, the Enforcement Acts of 1870 and 1871, and the Ku Klux Klan Act. They created the Department of Justice to enforce these laws and supported President Grant in his usage of the military to prevent states from reconstituting slavery under another name.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 90: June 29, 1956: President Dwight D. Eisenhower Signs National Interstate and Defense Highways Act, Establishing an Interstate System – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

June 29, 1956: President Dwight D. Eisenhower Signs National Interstate and Defense Highways Act, Establishing an Interstate System

In 1919, Dwight Eisenhower was part of a U.S. Army caravan of motor vehicles traveling across the country as a publicity stunt. The convoy encountered woeful and inadequate roads in terrible condition. The journey took two months by the time it was completed. When Eisenhower was in Germany after the end of World War II, he was deeply impressed by the Autobahn because of its civilian and military applications. The experiences were formative in shaping Eisenhower’s thinking about developing a national highway system in the United States. He later said, “We must build new roads,” and asked Congress for “forward looking action.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Gary Porter 10. Dates in American History, Essay 91: July 30, 1956: President Dwight D. Eisenhower Signs Law Establishing “In God We Trust” as National Motto, Added to Paper Currency – Guest Essayist: Gary Porter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter

July 30, 1956: President Dwight D. Eisenhower Signs Law Establishing “In God We Trust” as National Motto, Added to Paper Currency

While speaking on June 14, 1954, Flag Day, President Dwight D. Eisenhower talked about the importance of reaffirming religious faith in America’s heritage and future, that doing so would “constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country’s most powerful resource, in peace or in war.” In 1864 during the Civil War, the phrase “In God We Trust” first appeared on U.S. coins. On July 30, 1956, “In God We Trust” became the nation’s motto as President Eisenhower signed into law a bill declaring it, along with having the motto printed in capital letters, on every United States denomination of paper currency.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 92: October 4, 1957: USSR Launches Sputnik, Shocks the United States Into the Space Age – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

October 4, 1957: USSR Launches Sputnik, Shocks the United States Into the Space Age

The Cold War between the United States and Soviet Union was a geopolitical struggle around the globe characterized by an ideological contest between capitalism and communism, and a nuclear arms race. An important part of the Cold War was the space race which became a competition between the two superpowers.

Joshua Schmid, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 93: October 28, 1962: Cuban Missile Crisis Ends, Affects United States Foreign Policy for Decades – Guest Essayist: Joshua Schmid, Joshua Schmid, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

October 28, 1962: Cuban Missile Crisis Ends, Affects United States Foreign Policy for Decades

Despite an elaborate scheme to disguise the missiles and the launch sites, American intelligence discovered the Soviet scheme by mid-October. President John F. Kennedy immediately convened a team of security advisors, who suggested a variety of options. These included ignoring the missiles, using diplomacy to pressure the Soviets to remove the missiles, invading Cuba, blockading the island, and strategic airstrikes on the missile sites. Kennedy’s military advisors strongly suggested a full-scale invasion of Cuba as the only way to defeat the threat. However, the president ultimately overrode them and decided any attack would only provoke greater conflict with the Russians. On October 22, Kennedy gave a speech to the American people in which he called for a “quarantine” of the island under which “all ships of any kind bound for Cuba, from whatever nation or port, will, if found to contain cargoes of offensive weapons, be turned back.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Andrew Langer, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay 94: May 7, 1964: President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Speech Launches Great Society of Government Expansion – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer

May 7, 1964: President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Speech Launches Great Society of Government Expansion

Normally, when the executive branch engages in policymaking, those policies are governed by a series of rules aimed at ensuring public participation—both so that the public can offer their ideas at possible solutions, but also to ensure that the government isn’t abusing its powers. Here, the Johnson administration did no such thing—creating, essentially, a perfect storm of problematic policymaking: a massive upheaval of government policy, coupled with massive spending proposals, coupled with little public scrutiny.

Robert L. Woodson Sr., 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Robert L. Woodson Sr., Essay 95: The True Casualties of the War on Poverty Are Its Purported Beneficiaries – Guest Essayist: Robert L. Woodson, Sr., 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

The True Casualties of the War on Poverty Are Its Purported Beneficiaries

When President Lyndon B. Johnson announced the launch of a nationwide War on Poverty in 1964, momentary hope arose that it would uplift the lives of thousands of impoverished Americans and their inner-city neighborhoods. But the touted antipoverty campaign of the 60s is a classic example of injury with the helping hand. While impoverished Americans may not be rising up, what has become a virtual “poverty industry” and the bureaucracy of welfare system has prospered, expanding to 89 separate programs spread across 14 government programs and agencies. In sum, 70% of anti-poverty funding has not reached the poor but has been absorbed by those who serve the poor. As a consequence, the system has created a commodity out of the poor with perverse incentives to maintain people in poverty as dependents. The operative question became not which problems are solvable, but which ones are fundable.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Dan Morenoff 10. Dates in American History, Essay 96: July 2, 1964: President Lyndon B. Johnson Signs the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Guest Essayist: Dan Morenoff, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Dan Morenoff

July 2, 1964: President Lyndon B. Johnson Signs the Civil Rights Act of 1964

On July 2, 1964, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law on national television. Finally, on the same day that John Adams had predicted 188 years earlier would be forever commemorated as a “Day of Deliverance” with “Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other[,]” the federal government had restored the law abandoned with Reconstruction in 1876.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay 97: August 7, 1964: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the Vietnam War – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

August 7, 1964: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the Vietnam War

On March 12, 1947, President Harry Truman delivered a speech advocating assistance to Greece and Turkey to resist communism as part of the early Cold War against the Soviet Union. The speech enunciated the Truman Doctrine, which led to a departure from the country’s traditional foreign policy to a more expansive direction in global affairs. Truman said, “I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.” Protecting the free world against communist expansion became the basis for the policy of Cold War containment.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Dan Morenoff 10. Dates in American History, Essay 98: August 6, 1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson Signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965 – Guest Essayist: Dan Morenoff, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Dan Morenoff

August 6, 1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson Signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Congress made good on the President’s promises and fulfilled its oath. The Voting Rights Act, the crowning achievement of the Civil Rights Movement, was signed into law in August 1965, less than five (5) months after those bloody events in Selma. The VRA would allow individuals to sue in federal court when their voting rights were denied. It would allow the Department of Justice to do the same. And, recognizing that “voting discrimination … on a pervasive scale” justified an “uncommon exercise of congressional power[,]” despite the attendant “substantial federalism costs[,]” it required certain states and localities, for a limited time, to obtain the approval (or “pre-clearance”) of either DOJ or a federal court sitting in Washington, DC before making any alteration to their voting laws, from registration requirements to the location of polling places.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Danny de Gracia 10. Dates in American History, Essay 99: July 20, 1969: The United States Lands on the Moon and Wins the Space Race – Guest Essayist: Danny de Gracia, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Danny de Gracia

July 20, 1969: The United States Lands on the Moon and Wins the Space Race

The story of how men first set foot on the Moon one fateful day on July 20, 1969, will always be enshrined as one of America’s greatest contributions to history. When the first humans looked upwards to the night sky thousands of years ago, they must have marveled at the pale Moon looming in the heavens, set against the backdrop of countless stars. Inspired by the skies, and driven by a natural desire for exploration, humans must have wondered what was out there, and if it would be somehow possible to ever explore the distant heavens above.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 100: August 9, 1974: Richard M. Nixon Resigns as President, Ending the Watergate Scandal – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

August 9, 1974: Richard M. Nixon Resigns as President, Ending the Watergate Scandal

On Thursday, August 8, 1974, a somber Richard Nixon addressed the American people in a 16-minute speech via television to announce that he was planning to resign from the Presidency of the United States. He expressed regret over mistakes he made about the break-in at the Democratic Party offices at the Watergate Hotel and the aftermath of that event. He further expressed the hope that his resignation would begin to heal the political divisions the matter had exacerbated. The next day, having resigned, he boarded a helicopter and, with his family, left Washington, D.C.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 101: April 30, 1975: Fall of Saigon, America Losing Cold War Until Ronald Reagan Elected President – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

April 30, 1975: Fall of Saigon, America Losing Cold War Until Ronald Reagan Elected President

The election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 marked THE crucial turning point in winning the Cold War with Russia-dominated Communism, the USSR. Reagan’s rise to national prominence began with the surge in communist insurgencies and revolutions worldwide that began after the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, and all South Vietnam to the communists. After 58,000 American lives and trillions in treasure lost over the tenures of five American Presidents, the United States left the Vietnam War and South Vietnam to the communists.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 102: November 4, 1979: The Iranian Hostage Crisis Begins – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

November 4, 1979: The Iranian Hostage Crisis Begins

Starting in September 1979, radical students began planning a more extensive assault on the Embassy. This included daily demonstrations outside the U.S. Embassy to trigger an Embassy security response. This allowed organizers to assess the size and capabilities of the Embassy security forces. On November 4, 1979, one of the demonstrations erupted into an all-out conflict by the Embassy’s Visa processing public entrance. The assault leaders deployed approximately 500 students. Female students hid metal cutters under their robes, which were used to breach the Embassy gates.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 103: November 4, 1980: President Ronald Reagan Elected, Modern Conservatism Ascends to Preserve Individual Freedom – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

November 4, 1980: President Ronald Reagan Elected, Modern Conservatism Ascends to Preserve Individual Freedom

The election of Ronald Reagan on November 4, 1980 was one of the two most important elections of the 20th Century. It was a revolution in every way. In 1932, Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) decisively defeated one term incumbent Herbert Hoover by 472-59 Electoral votes. His election ushered in the era of aggressive liberalism, expanding the size of government, and establishing diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union. Roosevelt’s inner circle, his “brain trust,” were dedicated leftists, several of whom conferred with Lenin and Stalin on policy issues prior to 1932.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Tony Williams 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 104: November 9, 1989: The Berlin Wall is Torn Down, the Cold War is Ended and America Wins – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams

November 9, 1989: The Berlin Wall is Torn Down, the Cold War is Ended and America Wins

Reagan had a long history of attacking communist states and the idea of communism itself that shaped his strategic outlook. In the decades after World War II, like many Americans, he was concerned about Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe spreading elsewhere. In 1952, Reagan compared communism to Nazism and other forms of totalitarianism characterized by a powerful state that limited individual freedoms.

Reagan and his team arrived in West Berlin on June 12. He spoke to reporters and nervous German officials, telling them, “This is the only wall that has ever been built to keep people in, not keep people out.” Meanwhile, in East Berlin, the German secret police and Russian KGB agents cordoned off an area a thousand yards wide opposite the spot where Reagan was to speak on the other side of the wall. They wanted to ensure that no one could hear the message of freedom.

The Honorable Don Ritter, 90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 105: Fall of the Berlin Wall and End of the Cold War – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Don Ritter, The Honorable Don Ritter, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies

Fall of the Berlin Wall and End of the Cold War

In October of 1989, hundreds of thousands of East German citizens demonstrated in Leipzig, following a pattern of demonstrations for freedom and human rights throughout Eastern Europe and following the first ever free election in a Communist country, Poland, in the Spring of 1989. Hungary had opened its southern border with Austria and East Germans seeking a better life were fleeing there. Czechoslovakia had done likewise on its western border and the result was the same. The East German government had been on edge and was seeking to reduce domestic tensions by granting limited passage of its citizens to West Germany. And that’s when the dam broke.

This surprising information about free passage was spread throughout East Berlin, East Germany and, indeed, around the word like a lightning bolt. Massive crowds gathered near-instantaneously and celebrated at the heavily guarded Wall gates which, in a party-like atmosphere amid total confusion, were opened by hard core communist yet totally outmanned Border Police, who normally had orders to shoot-to-kill anyone attempting to escape. A floodgate was opened and an unstoppable flood of freedom-seeking humanity passed through, unimpeded.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Danny de Gracia 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 106: August 2, 1990: Persian Gulf War (Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm) Begins – Guest Essayist: Danny de Gracia, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Danny de Gracia

August 2 1990 Persian Gulf War Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm Begins Guest Essayist Danny de Gracia

It’s hard to believe that this year marks thirty years since Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August of 1990. In history, some events can be said to be turning points for civilization that set the world on fire, and in many ways, our international system has not been the same since the invasion of Kuwait. Today, the Iraq that went to war against Kuwait is no more, and Saddam Hussein himself is long dead, but the battles that were fought, the policies that resulted, and the history that followed is one that will haunt the world for many more years to come.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 108: March 23, 2010: President Barack H. Obama Signs the Affordable Care Act – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath

March 23, 2010: President Barack H. Obama Signs the Affordable Care Act

On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), sometimes casually referred to as “Obamacare,” a sobriquet that Obama himself embraced in 2013. The ACA covered 900 pages and hundreds of provisions. The law was so opaque and convoluted that legislators, bureaucrats, and Obama himself at times were unclear about its scope. For example, the main goal of the law was presented as providing health insurance to all Americans who previously were unable to obtain it due to, among other factors, lack of money or pre-existing health conditions. The law did increase the number of individuals covered by insurance, but stopped well short of universal coverage. Several of its unworkable or unpopular provisions were delayed by executive order. Others were subject to litigation to straighten out conflicting requirements. The ACA represented a probably not-yet-final step in the massive bureaucratization of health insurance and care over the past several decades, as health care moved from a private arrangement to a government-subsidized “right.”

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, Scot Faulkner 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 107: September 11, 2001: Islamic Terrorists Attack New York City and Washington, D.C. – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

September 11, 2001: Islamic Terrorists Attack New York City and Washington, D.C.

For those old enough to remember, September 11, 2001, 9:03 a.m. is burned into our collective memory. It was at that moment that United Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. Everyone was watching. American Airlines Flight 11 had crashed into the North Tower seventeen minutes earlier. For those few moments there was uncertainty whether the first crash was a tragic accident. Then, on live television, the South Tower fire ball vividly announced to the world that America was under attack.

90 in 90 2020, 6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 10. Dates in American History, Essay. 109: Conclusion: American Republicanism as a Way of Life – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, 2020 - Dates in American History, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 Day Studies, William Morrisey PhD

Conclusion: American Republicanism as a Way of Life

The Constitution itself begins with the phrase “We the People,” and the reason constitutional law governs all statutory laws is that the sovereign people ratified that Constitution. A republic might be ‘unitary’—ruled by a single, centralized government. The American Founders saw that this would lead to an overbearing national government, one that would eventually undermine republican self-government itself. They gave the federal government enumerated powers, leaving the remaining governmental powers “to the States, or the People.” The Civil War was fought over this issue, as well as slavery, the question of whether the American Union could defend itself against its internal enemies.

The classical political philosophers classified the forms of political rule, giving names to the several ‘regimes’ they saw around them. They emphasized the importance of regimes because regimes, they knew, designate who rules us, the institutions by which the rulers rule, the purposes of that rule, and finally the way of life of citizens or subjects. In choosing a republican regime on a democratic foundation, governing a large territory for commercial purposes with a carefully calibrated set of governmental powers, all intended to secure the natural rights of citizens according to the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, the Founders set the course of human events on a new and better direction. Each generation of Americans has needed to understand the American way of life and to defend it.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Langer, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Public Lands and the Federal Government’s “Duty to Dispose” – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Public Lands and the Federal Government’s “Duty to Dispose”

Incidentally, the reason for this trade-off was a product of good public policy: these states wanted to be settled in the easiest and least chaotic manner possible. An essential element of that was ensuring that unappropriated public lands had “clear title”—a situation discussed at length in Peruvian economist and political scientist Hernando DeSoto’s seminal work, “The Mystery of Capital.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Conclusion: The States and the Union – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Conclusion: The States and the Union

Throughout this study, essayists have shown how the American federal republic has empowered its own constituent states to retain substantial self-government without sacrificing the general powers needed for national defense against enemies foreign and domestic, retaining the freedom of interstate commerce, communication, and travel that affords the American people one of the highest living standards in the world.

In the past century, the centralization and bureaucratization of both the federal and state governments have weakened citizen self-government, but the words of the original Constitution as amended in the years immediately succeeding the Civil War, and the intentions of the Framers and those citizens who have remained loyal to their intentions, guided by their principles of equal, natural (and therefore unalienable rights remain as a standard for those who continue to hold certain truths to be self-evident.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, James C. Clinger, Michael W. Hail 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Crafting Constitutions in the Commonwealth of Kentucky – Guest Essayists: James C. Clinger and Michael W. Hail, James C. Clinger, Michael W. Hail

Crafting Constitutions in the Commonwealth of Kentucky

Constitutions can be thought of as institutional arrangements that shape the way that individual preferences will be expressed and collective decisions made within a government. The provisions of a constitution also reflect preferences, but the provisions of a constitution may have long-run impacts upon the way that individual preferences are translated into legally binding collective decisions well into the future. Some of these decisions will have implications that are unforeseen and unintended, even if the specific provisions of a constitution were intended by its framers to have different results. In particular, the constitutional framework of a state or nation shapes the path dependent development of that political community. Once the highest law of a polity has been designed, political, legal, and economic decisions are made with that framework in mind. Decisions involving sunk costs are made premised on a particular legal order. Once those decisions are made, it may be difficult to reverse them. The political and economic trajectory of a polity may be set in place, and the momentum built up over history may be hard to swerve in a different direction. Such can be seen in Kentucky’s experience with its state constitutions.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, J. Drew Seib, James C. Clinger 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, How State Legislatures Work in American Government (Part 2) – Guest Essayists: James C. Clinger and J. Drew Seib, J. Drew Seib, James C. Clinger

How State Legislatures Work in American Government (Part 2)

State legislatures normally have had only very few, basic constitutional procedural requirements regarding the passage of legislation. Most state constitutions stipulate that laws can be enacted only after bicameral passage of identical measures, followed by presentment to the chief executive. There may also be requirements that bills receive “readings” on three or more legislative days before passage. Practically speaking, most legislative procedure is determined by internal rules of each chamber. These rules refer to bill referral to committees, methods of bringing bills to the chamber floor, procedures for disciplining members, etc.

Many of the early state constitutions did not provide a means by which the governor could block legislation through a veto. This reflected an anti-executive power bias that carried over from the opposition to the king in colonial times. Gradually, however, the powers of governors increased, and among the most important powers of the governor was the power to veto. In the 1990s, North Carolina’s governor was the last to gain the veto power. The veto power varies dramatically among the states, particularly regarding which measures are subject to veto and the ease with which the legislatures can override the veto. Many states now permit an item veto for appropriation bills, but not for other legislation. Proposed constitutional amendments approved as joint resolutions by the legislature cannot be vetoed by the governor, but instead in most states today go to the electorate for approval. In several states vetoes can be overridden by margins much smaller than the two-thirds requirement necessary for overriding presidential vetoes. In some states, only a simple majority of those elected to serve in each chamber is needed to override the governor’s veto.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, J. Drew Seib, James C. Clinger 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, How State Legislatures Work in American Government (Part 1) – Guest Essayists: James C. Clinger and J. Drew Seib, J. Drew Seib, James C. Clinger

How State Legislatures Work in American Government (Part 1)

The legislatures in American state governments developed alongside and even prior to the more famous and well-studied Congress of the federal government. Their origins can be found in the colonial assemblies that existed before the American Revolution. Those institutions developed structures, procedures, and qualifications for office-holding that influenced the development of the national legislature. This essay will briefly describe the development of the state legislatures and their relationship to the federal government.

Legislatures in the American colonies developed very quickly, largely at the request of local interests, not at the behest of the British government. These assemblies varied greatly from one another, although most, but not all, were bicameral, with different qualifications for office-holding and for voting for different chambers. These assemblies were not modeled after the British parliament, which in its modern form did not exist. In fact, the first legislatures in the American colonies were created long before the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which established the principle of parliamentary supremacy over the monarch.

Blog

Essay Schedule 90-Day Study 2020

In the Course of Human Events: A 90 Day Study of Important Dates in American History That Shaped the United States and Changed the World Essay 1 – Introduction Recovering Our Legacy: The Many Uses of the American Past by Wilfred M. McClay, G.T. & Libby Blankenship Chair in the History of Liberty; Director of […]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Brad Bergford 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Brad Bergford, Utah: Unique Among States – Guest Essayist: Brad Bergford

Utah: Unique Among States

Utah has a fascinating history from the days before it was a United States territory to today. The first Europeans arrived in the area in 1765. In 1821, Mexico won its independence from Spain and claimed Utah for itself. In 1832, Antoine Robidoux built the first trading post in Utah, and in 1841, John Bartleson led the first wagon train across Utah to California. During the 1800s, Utah bore the indicia of western expansion. Many regard the completion of the transcontinental railroad at Promontory Summit, Utah, on May 10, 1869 as not only one of the most important historical events in Utah, but also one of the most momentous in U.S. history.

Utah stands unique in its history and traditions, and it cannot be understood apart from the influence of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the “LDS church”) and its adherents, the Mormons. Utah’s path to statehood began principally because of precipitous settlement by Mormons, who moved west after failed settlement attempts in New York, Illinois, and, most notably, in Jackson County, Missouri, where they had intended to establish an everlasting temple. In 1847, Brigham Young, by then the leader of the main branch of the LDS church, entered the Salt Lake Valley with 148 comrades and founded Salt Lake City. At the time, the area was part of Mexico, but early in 1848 through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico ceded 525,000 square miles, including present-day Utah, to the United States.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Michael Warren 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Not Double Vision, Double Constitutions: Michigan History and Statehood (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Michael Warren, The Honorable Michael Warren

Not Double Vision, Double Constitutions: Michigan History and Statehood (Part 2)

Unlike the U.S. Constitution, the Michigan Constitution addresses in detail the administrative state over which the governor presides. For example, there are no more than “20 principal departments. They shall be grouped as far as practicable according to major purposes.”65 In addition, unless legislatively vetoed, the governor has plenary authority to reorganize the executive branch via executive order.66

The Michigan Constitution also establishes a statewide elected state board of education;67 elected statewide boards for the University of Michigan, Wayne State University, and Michigan State University;68 an appointed civil rights commission;69 an appointed state transportation commission;70 a Michigan nongame fish and wildlife trust fund;71 a Michigan game and fish protection fund;72 a Michigan conservation and recreation legacy fund;73 a Michigan veterans trust fund;74 and a Michigan natural resources trust fund.75

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Michael Warren 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Not Double Vision, Double Constitutions: Michigan History and Statehood (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Michael Warren, The Honorable Michael Warren

Not Double Vision, Double Constitutions: Michigan History and Statehood (Part 1)

When one is tasked to write about “the constitution,” my guess is not many ponder a threshold question: “Which constitution?” With the anniversary of the signing of the United States Constitution occurring on September 17 (dubbed “Constitution Day” – and also an anchor date for Patriot Week), one might naturally think the U.S. Constitution must be the topic. Not necessarily so. Because each state also has a constitution, each person lives under two constitutions.

Few people understand the U.S. Constitution well, and only a minute number understand their state constitution. As a former debater, I appreciate that one should understand both sides of an issue to become deeply informed. Likewise, to best understand our constitutions, the best course may be to compare and contrast them. Accordingly, this article will review the basic contours of the constitutions of the State of Michigan and the United States to discern their commonalities and yawning differences. By necessity of space and time, this article will only address a few high-level topics such as age, origins, amendment process and the branches of government, and will not delve into the wonderful commentary that this comparison might yield.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Brad Bergford 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Big Sky Country of Montana: History and Statehood – Guest Essayist: Brad Bergford, Brad Bergford

Big Sky Country of Montana: History and Statehood

Native American peoples lived in the area of present-day Montana for an unknown period of time before the arrival of the first Europeans in the 18th century. Most of present-day Montana was included in the Louisiana Purchase, which President Jefferson completed in 1803. The next year, President Jefferson commissioned the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Soon after, Catholic missionaries entered Montana. Beaver trappers followed shortly thereafter. Through the first twenty years of the 19th Century, the Salish people learned about Christianity because of their contact with the Iroquois people and with Jesuit priests. In the 1830s, the Salish people began sending emissaries to Jesuits in St. Louis, Missouri to request that a “blackrobe” (Jesuit priest) be sent to them in present-day Montana. The blackrobes were finally able to send a priest to minister to the Salish people in 1841.

Between 1848 and 1864, parts of present-day Montana were included in several U.S. territories, including the Oregon, Washington, Dakota, and the Idaho Territories. Montana was the site of the battle between the Sioux people and the U.S. Army, which we often refer to as “Custer’s Last Stand,” and it carries a lively history typical of the Old West.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Greg Davidson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Capital Cities and Capitol Buildings: Seats of State Government Across America (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: Greg Davidson, Greg Davidson

Capital Cities and Capitol Buildings: Seats of State Government Across America (Part 2)

State capitol buildings in the United States embody the constitutional commitments found within the text of each state constitution, buildings that some have called the very temples of democracy. Each state capitol building in the United States presents the basic, fundamental attentiveness of the state government to the people it serves. Some of the capitols are small, domed buildings with expansive wings, while others are tall, executive-style towers reaching upward toward the heavens. Some are cloistered in urban areas. Most are set in rural settings. Some harken back to classical Rome, while others celebrate the preeminence of modern man. One thing they all have in common: each embodies the values of their respective constitutions while continuously serving as the seats of governance for the states and their citizens.

In general, the shape and design of state capitol buildings can be understood in three common categories: the statehouse, the domed capitol, and the executive tower. The statehouse form generally has a flat or slightly pitched roof with some type of spire or lantern capping off the building. Some statehouses are built with flat fronts and square windows in a federal style while others incorporated columns and wide porticos. Many early American capitols have slightly pitched or flat roofs and small areas for assembly and the conduct of business. The first capitol was a flat, adobe structure in Santa Fe, while later colonial capitol buildings in the northeast generally had pitched roofs to allow snow and precipitation to roll off.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Greg Davidson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Capital Cities and Capitol Buildings: Seats of State Government Across America (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Greg Davidson, Greg Davidson

Capital Cities and Capitol Buildings: Seats of State Government Across America (Part 1)

American state capital cities are an organic part of the American landscape. Capital cities sprung up along the natural waterways and pathways of American travel and commerce. Some grew next to the mighty rivers and others at the junction of major trade routes. Some are in the foothills while others are on the plains, some on the coastal bays and others far inland. Some emerged from the bareness of the great plains while others emerged from the small neighborhoods, burgs and towns that dotted the landscape. Some are located in major urban centers while others snuggle into smaller, rural communities. The fifty American state capital cities provide a unique study in the diversity and richness of the American experience.

The oldest American capital cities grew on opposite sides of the continent. Santa Fe was founded in 1610 as the first colonial American capital city followed by Boston in 1630. Santa Fe was designated as capital of the new Spanish colony of Santa Fe de Nuevo México and was situated in the foothills of the Sangre de Cristo mountains. Thirty years later the British Massachusetts Bay Colony established its capital on what was then known as Trimountaine, or Three Mountains, later to be renamed Boston after Lincolnshire, England previous home of some of the prominent colonists.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Mary Salamon 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Mary Salamon, Role of State Representatives and Their House Speakers, and State Senators – Guest Essayist: Mary Salamon

Role of State Representatives and Their House Speakers, and State Senators

State government is designed almost exactly like the Federal government. In every state except Nebraska, state governments govern with a two-chamber legislature. The smaller, upper chamber, is called the State Senate and the larger, lower chamber, is called the House of Representatives, Assembly or House of Delegates.

There are three branches of government in every state: legislative, executive, and judicial. The balance of powers spread among three branches ensures a just and fair system. Most states have a governor, lieutenant governor, senators and representatives, most of whom serve in what is called a State Legislature. Other names used are General Assembly, General Court, or Legislative Assembly.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Jeff Hollingsworth 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, A Fire Bell in the Night: The Story of Maine Statehood (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Jeff Hollingsworth

A Fire Bell in the Night: The Story of Maine Statehood (Part 2)

Along came Maine, where separation sentiment was growing. Many previous efforts to permit Maine to break away died in the Massachusetts General Court (legislature). But the times were catching up. Seeking to eliminate its Revolutionary War debt to the U.S. government, Massachusetts found easy money by selling off vast swaths of public land in Maine and by granting generous acreages to war veterans. Thousands of pioneer families left the crowded Bay State and trekked to the Maine wilderness seeking elbow room and new opportunities. In less than 30 years, the population more than tripled, from 91,000 in 1791 to 300,000 by 1820.

As Maine grew, so did discontent with its political and economic dependence on Massachusetts. Prosperous coastal merchants, eager to govern themselves, were the first to complain. But with continued population growth outside the old coastal towns, frustration spread to fishermen and inland farmers and woodsmen, who had little in common with the governing gentry. By 1800, they were spearheading the quest for statehood, citing a long list of economic and political grievances. The War of 1812 was the final nail in the coffin, even for the merchant class.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Jeff Hollingsworth 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, A Fire Bell in the Night: The Story of Maine Statehood (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Jeff Hollingsworth

A Fire Bell in the Night: The Story of Maine Statehood (Part 1)

Barely 30 years after the contentious adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the experiment in self-government and democratic republicanism that enraptured de Tocqueville and other noted admirers of the new United States of America was at grave risk of collapse. Maine’s aspirations for statehood were at the heart of the hullabaloo. It was in a wrestling match with Missouri for admission to the Union. In fact, Members of Congress representing the District of Maine, as it was known—then belonging to Massachusetts—voted against legislation that would have admitted their home as a state even after longstanding agitation in Maine for statehood.

So why, when at long last statehood was within reach, did these officials and many of those they represented object to legislation that would unlock the door to statehood? Their reasons are at the heart of why we are “one nation, indivisible” and how small, remote Maine helped preserve the U. S. of A. at a grave hour in its early history.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Brad Bergford 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, Brad Bergford, Oregon: Alis Volat Propriis “She Flies With Her Own Wings” – Guest Essayist: Brad Bergford, Role of State and Local Government and the Bill of Rights

Oregon: Alis Volat Propriis “She Flies With Her Own Wings”

Lewis and Clark famously made their way to the Oregon coast in 1805 while searching for a northwest passage. In 1818, the U.S. and Great Britain agreed to jointly occupy the region, which included portions of present-day Idaho, California, Montana, British Columbia, and all of Washington state. In 1840, the U.S. gained the territory through the Oregon Treaty, and settlers began to arrive via the Oregon Trail. The state’s establishment as the 33rd state in 1859 realized many, but not all, of the founding principles of the United States.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Nicholas Jacobs 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Funding States and Cities: The Arguments (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: Nicholas Jacobs, Nicholas Jacobs

Funding States and Cities: The Arguments (Part 2)

States, therefore, compete with one another for residents, for business, and ultimately, for tax dollars. And those competitive pressures incentivize state and local governing officials to provide the best government for the lowest cost.

Yet, sometimes that competition has negative effects — what political economists might label a “negative externality.” When the savings created by one state’s actions impose costs on other political communities, competition produces inefficiencies. This is best illustrated by state variation in how much is spent on environmental regulation and clean-up. States that are literally “up-river” can exact exorbitant costs on other states through their inaction. Likewise, in trying to attract business to their state, one state might dismantle regulations placed on corporations; neighboring states might follow suit in order to keep business from leaving. State-level variation and competition might, in other words, work against certain national goals, creating a “race to the bottom” where states undercut one another to create advantages in the short-term, but impose long-term costs on the national political community.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Nicholas Jacobs 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Funding States and Cities: The Arguments (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Nicholas Jacobs, Nicholas Jacobs

Funding States and Cities: The Arguments (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Nicholas Jacobs

As he writes in Federalist 36, if the general government begins to tax a revenue source already occupied by the states, “the United States [federal government] will either wholly abstain from the projects preoccupied for local purposes, or will make use of the State officers and State regulations for collecting the additional imposition. This will best answer the views of revenue, because it will save expense in the collection and will best avoid any occasion of disgust to the State governments and to the people.”

Therefore, concurrent taxation encourages intergovernmental cooperation. It is a cooperation defined first and foremost by efficient tax collection — the reduction of government expense by the sharing of administrative processes — as well as transparency. In the above passage, the guardians of the public revenues are the state legislatures, who have an interest in maintaining their own fiscal authority and independence, and, most importantly, the people themselves, who have little desire to give away their hard-earned dollars to a wasteful government.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Nicholas Jacobs 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Funding States and Cities: How Dollars Work (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: Nicholas Jacobs, Nicholas Jacobs

Funding States and Cities: How Dollars Work (Part 2)

Every nickel spent by a state or local government ultimately comes from the pockets of some private entity, but often public monies are exchanged between governments. Intergovernmental transfer payments account for 23 percent of all money spent by state and local governments. Most intergovernmental transfer payments point “downwards” in the federal system, moving from larger governments to ones of smaller size. The federal government delivered $621-billion to the various states in 2016, and state governments sent $524-billion to various localities in that same year. Overtime, intergovernmental payments have grown as a share of state and local government revenues — a trend we will evaluate in the next essay — and the federal government has even come to make direct payments to localities in some specific instances.

Most forms of intergovernmental revenue take the form of grants — direct payments to a state or local government agency, with a specific purpose outlined by the grantee. The federal government, for example, sends billions of dollars it collects to the states for the purpose of constructing and maintaining highways. Likewise, state governments send some tax revenue it collects to localities for funding public health programs. The federal government even sends money to the states that the states then divide up and send to the localities.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Nicholas Jacobs 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Funding States and Cities: How Dollars Work (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Nicholas Jacobs, Nicholas Jacobs

Funding States and Cities: How Dollars Work (Part 1)

If, “in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes,” in the United States, taxes are a little more certain than death. Americans, after all, pay taxes to not just one national government, but to at least two additional ones as well: their state and locality. Paradoxically though, the framers of the U.S. Constitution believed that by establishing a system of multiple governments with independent taxing authority, the total tax burden placed on citizens would be less than it would be if one gargantuan government existed.

For anyone that has ever filed your own taxes, you know that it is highly technical and subject to precise calculations, lengthy procedure, and numerous exemptions. Yet, at its most basic level, the methods by which governments acquire money are political determinations — reflective of each community’s unique history, size, political culture, and available resources. The variation across different levels of government and between governments of similar scale reflects the political diversity American federalism nourishes. Understanding that variation in all of its complexity is the first step towards evaluating how federalism, despite creating many governments, can actually reduce the total tax burden placed on the American taxpayer.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tom Morain 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, The Path to Iowa Statehood – Guest Essayist: Tom Morain, Tom Morain

The Path to Iowa Statehood

Early in its history the U.S. Congress set up an orderly way for western lands to become states with status equal to the Original Thirteen. Senators and representatives in Congress remembered how unhappy the American colonists were under Great Britain’s rule, so unhappy in fact that they fought the American Revolution to become free of Great Britain. One of the most important acts that Congress passed was the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 that set up a system of government for the territory north of the Ohio River that became the states of Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin. It was a model for other U.S. territories to follow when they wanted to become states.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable David L. Robbins 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, New Mexico Constitutional History – Guest Essayist: The Honorable David L. Robbins, The Honorable David L. Robbins

New Mexico Constitutional History

New Mexico became the 47th state to join the union on January 6, 1912. This was shortly before Arizona was admitted on February 14, 1912. The New Mexico Constitution became effective on the day Congress admitted New Mexico to the union. The original document was ratified by the New Mexico Constitutional Convention on November 21, 1910. The voters of the State ratified the constitution on November 5, 1911.

The ratified constitution and eventual boundaries varied widely from what was originally proposed in the mid 1800’s. The New Mexico territory was formed following the end of the Spanish American War in 1848 through the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The territory initially consisted of parts of west Texas (which claimed the territory east of the Rio Grande river), most of present-day Arizona, and part of southern Colorado.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Wilfred M. McClay 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Oklahoma, November 16, 1907: Forty-Sixth Admitted to the United States – Guest Essayist: Wilfred M. McClay, Wilfred M. McClay

Oklahoma, November 16, 1907: Forty-Sixth Admitted to the United States

Even so, as the forty-sixth state in the Union, Oklahoma possesses a name that is derived from the Choctaw words okla and humma, meaning “red people,” and that name fittingly signifies the uniquely enduring importance of the Native population to the state’s identity. In no other state of the Union is the Native presence more important, more indelible, more enduring—and arguably, more honored in the state’s politics and culture. Yet the achievement of that relatively harmonious state of affairs was bitter and difficult, particularly for the Native population, which had to accept betrayals and abrogation of agreements at every step of the way.

Once a state, though, Oklahoma quickly took its place as an important center of the burgeoning petroleum industry, with the city of Tulsa being labeled “The Oil Capital of the World,” and the oil industry serving as a primary driver of the entire state’s booming economy. From the moment that Oklahoma had become part of the United States in 1803, growth had become its byword. It had gone in just a few years from being a raw and forbidding frontier to being a leading force in the growth of the world’s economy, a force now moving into higher and higher gear.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Jeremy Ward 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Alabama Statehood and Its State Constitution History – Guest Essayist: Jeremy Ward, Jeremy Ward

Alabama Statehood and Its State Constitution History

Just as Alabama’s boundary lines changed numerous times over the years, so too did its capital. The first was the territorial capital in St. Stephens in 1817, near present-day Jackson, Alabama. Then in 1819, Huntsville served as the temporary capital while a convention assembled to prepare a State Constitution. The first “permanent” capital was established in 1820 near the convergence of the Alabama and Cahaba rivers but a flood resulted in damage to the statehouse. The capital was soon moved to Tuscaloosa in 1826 to a new three-story building designed by the same architect, William Nichols, who designed the old capitols in North Carolina and Mississippi. The capital made one final move in 1846 to its current location of Montgomery, but a disastrous fire shortly after required its rebuilding.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Langer, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Clearing Title: How Simple Legal Acts Have Great Societal Consequences – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Clearing Title: How Simple Legal Acts Have Great Societal Consequences

Clearing title, the action of ensuring that someone owns a particular parcel of land “free and clear” is one of these actions. From the standpoint of real estate law, the importance is obvious: you cannot buy or sell or invest in a parcel of land unless the thread of ownership is crystal clear. But clearing title goes far beyond that—and is an essential element of a free and prosperous society.

DeSoto is emphatic that ensuring the clarity of title is one of the most-important, if not the most, single element that separates a rich and stable nation from a poor and unstable one. Without that clear title, people are hesitant to buy or sell a piece of property. Worse, without that clear title, people cannot use that piece of property to invest in their own future. They cannot better themselves, and without that prospect they lose hope. And it is that loss of hope, combined with economic stagnation, that leads to the collapse of a society.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Benjamin DiBiase, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, A Brief History of Florida and Its Constitutions – Guest Essayist: Benjamin DiBiase, Benjamin DiBiase

A Brief History of Florida and Its Constitutions

Florida is the southernmost state in the contiguous United States, situated at the bottom of the Atlantic seaboard. It is a peninsula, bordered by the Atlantic to the east, Gulf to the west, Caribbean Sea to the south and the U.S. states of Georgia and Alabama form its northern border. Archaeologists believe the peninsula was first occupied by a nomadic group of hunter-gatherers around 14,000 years ago. These indigenous groups slowly adapted to a changing climate and grew crops, established large chiefdoms, and eventually numbered over 350,000 people by the end of the 15th century.

Florida was first sighted by Europeans in 1513, when Juan Ponce de Leon traveled north from Puerto Rico in search of natural resources, slaves, and potentially a new landmass for the Spanish colonial dominion. Although probably not the first European to set eyes on Florida, his expedition was the first officially sanctioned and recorded by the Spanish. He landed somewhere on Florida’s eastern Atlantic coast, but did not attempt to settle the region.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Danny de Gracia 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Danny de Gracia, The History of Hawaii: From Fire, Tears and Blood, A Tree of Liberty Blooms – Guest Essayist: Danny de Gracia

The History of Hawaii: From Fire, Tears and Blood, A Tree of Liberty Blooms

Born of ancient volcanoes in Earth’s prehistory and baptized by fire into the modern era by the bombs of the Imperial Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the history of the Fiftieth State is nothing short of legendary.

First discovered and populated by seafaring Polynesian peoples perhaps around the 12th century or even earlier, Hawaii would be thrust into global destiny by European contact when British Captain James Cook discovered and sailed past the island of Oahu on January 18, 1778. As a midpoint in the Pacific, the Hawaiian Islands would soon become a key strategic shipping hub that attracted merchants, missionaries, and militaries alike from around the world.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Mary Salamon 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, History of Washington State and Its Constitution – Guest Essayist: Mary Salamon, Mary Salamon

History of Washington State and Its Constitution

Washington State’s famous explorers are George Vancouver, Robert Gray and the American explorers Lewis and Clark. George Vancouver came to the Pacific Northwest with two ships, the Discovery and the Chatham. Vancouver named everything in sight, which included islands, mountains and waters. Puget Sound is named after Peter Puget, a lieutenant accompanying him on the expedition. To this day, we still have the names Whidbey Island, Mount Baker, Mount Rainier, and Hood Canal are all key geographical features in the state of Washington named by Vancouver.

The Washington State Constitution describes the fundamental structure and function of the state’s government. It consists of a preamble and 32 articles. This constitution is the second in Washington’s history. The first one was ratified in 1878, and the current version on October 1, 1889.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry, South Dakota: Admission as a New State and Its 1889 Constitution

South Dakota: Admission as a New State and Its 1889 Constitution

On March 2, 1861, President Buchanan signed the bill that created the Dakota Territory. Within this territory were included the present states of North and South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. After creating the Dakota Territory, the federal government paid relatively little attention to it, given the preoccupation with the war. But as soon as there was sufficient population in the territory, the settlers in the Dakota Territory began taking steps to achieve statehood. Starting in 1868, efforts intensified toward the admission of Dakota, either as a single state or two different states.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Donna Pearson, Kimberly Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Donna Pearson, Kimberly Porter, North Dakota: Constitution to Statehood – Guest Essayists: Kimberly Porter and Donna Pearson

North Dakota: Constitution to Statehood

Beyond the purchase of the Louisiana Territory, the first major move towards statehood and the need for a constitution in North Dakota came with one of President James Buchanan’s last acts as president of the United States. On March 2, 1861, just two days before Abraham Lincoln took the oath of office, Buchanan signed a bill creating Dakota Territory. This territory would later be divided into the states of North and South Dakota, as well as portions of Wyoming and Montana. At the same time, the Nebraska Territory was modified to appear much like the state it would become.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Amanda Hughes, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Words Have Consequences: Amending the United States Constitution and State Constitutions – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Words Have Consequences: Amending the United States Constitution and State Constitutions

For many Americans, when the term “amendment” is mentioned, our United States Constitution often comes to mind. Among the document’s twenty-seven, most are aware of the First Amendment, especially the part about free speech. Another popular amendment is the Second Amendment: the right to bear arms. These Amendments to our United States Constitution have even gained nicknames such as “1A” and “2A.”

Unfortunately, beyond the popular terms of our national Constitution, too little understanding exists about it, including reasons for limiting changes to the document. This is true as well for our state constitutions, though amended more often. Unless a major news story runs where a constitutional topic goes viral, little more is studied to gain a complete context especially for the true meaning and history behind the Framers’ intentions.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Civil Society and Local Government (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Civil Society and Local Government (Part 2)

Each element should have liberty, which “in no way consists in doing what one wants” but rather in “having the power to do what one should want to do and in no way being constrained to do what one should not want to do.” What one should want to do is to observe “the law of nature, which makes everything tend toward the preservation of species,” the “law of natural enlightenment, which wants us to do to others what we would want to have done to us,” and “the law that forms political societies,” which aims at the perpetuation of those societies. Certain moral virtues inhere in liberty itself. Republicanism consists of citizens who rule one another reciprocally, doing to one another as they would have done to themselves; federation enables republics to follow the political law of self-perpetuation.

For more than a century, the constitutional republicanism established by the Founders increasingly has given way to administrative government at the national, state, county, and even the local levels. As a result, Americans have needed to deliberate together less. The decline of civility in what remains of American political conversation may well originate in the decline of genuine civic life, genuine self-government, as part of the American way of life.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Civil Society and Local Government (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Civil Society and Local Government (Part 1)

If the distinctive human characteristic is the ability to speak and to reason, then what is good for such a being must not only allow but encourage it to exercise that ability, just as it must be good for a horse to have room to run. To live in societies ruled by tyrants terrorizing their subjects with brute force must be bad for human beings, somehow beneath their real nature—hence the adjective ‘brute.’ By nature, human beings belong in civil societies, societies in which they may speak and reason together, deliberate with one another on what they should do, how they should act. Old-fashioned mothers would tell unruly children to ‘be civil,’ to ‘keep a civil tongue in your head.’ A civil tongue is one indirectly but closely attached to a reasoning brain, a brain more fully developed in accordance with its nature than the brain of a madman or a dolt, to say nothing of a barking pit bull or a chorusing frog.

Civil society begins in the home. Parents command children, ‘for their own good.’ But father and mother themselves properly form a civil relationship, ruling one another by mutual consent, by shared responsibilities, authority, and obligations. Outside the home, what we call civil society works the same way, as fellow citizens form businesses, churches, clubs, and schools. Families and civil associations alike govern themselves deliberately, reasonably—insofar as they are genuinely civil, institutions fitted for mature human beings. Children learn to do the same thing, choosing up sides for games, ‘ganging up’ (for better or for worse), imitating the adults (also for better or for worse).

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Jennie Jones 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Jennie Jones, Right of the States to Oppose Tyranny – Guest Essayist: Jennie Jones

Right of the States to Oppose Tyranny

State and local officials have a duty to resist injustice and tyranny imposed upon their people by our central government. American citizens need to remind not only candidates for federal office, but also candidates for state office, of this fundamental constitutional reality, right, and duty. That is the only way (humanly speaking) we will reclaim and preserve our freedom.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Langer, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, The Essential Nature of Borders in Ensuring Sovereignty – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

The Essential Nature of Borders in Ensuring Sovereignty

Sovereignty is the very essence of what makes a “nation” a “nation”—a free and independent state in which the people of that nation exercise total control over the governance of that nation. Clear and enforceable borders are an essential element of that sovereignty. Without them, the nation itself cannot be defined, and the sovereignty of that nation falls as a matter of course.

These truisms have been bedrock concepts of both political science and international law for centuries, essentially tracing their roots to the Peace of Westphalia of 1648. A nation’s sovereignty is, in fact, enshrined in the central body of international law, the United Nations Charter, which says that, “nothing should authorise intervention in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.” But without enforceable borders, what determines the “domestic jurisdiction” for a state? And just how can a state govern itself if its borders are not secure?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Michael Maibach 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Michael Maibach, Renewal of American Federalism – Guest Essayist: Michael C. Maibach

Renewal of American Federalism

When federalism fails in a large republic, the success of the government itself comes into question. The Founders knew the enemies of our republic were national factions demanding more and more from other citizens, e.g. farmers, seniors, auto companies, solar panel makers, homeowners, doctors, patients… students. Once factions are nationalized, their combined negative effects on the economic and political health of a Nation can be catastrophic.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, KrisAnne Hall 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Greatest Power: Each State’s Obligation to Keep Its Creation of National Government in Check (Part 2) – Guest Essayist: KrisAnne Hall, KrisAnne Hall

Greatest Power: Each State’s Obligation to Keep Its Creation of National Government in Check (Part 2)

What ought to add to the State’s obligation to keep its creation, the federal government, under control, exists in the fact that the Declaration of Independence identifies the sole purpose of the creation of the States is to “secure the Rights” of the people. A federal government unlimited in its power, or limited only by its own will or whim is a totalitarian government, putting the rights of the people at risk. When the States are not keeping their creation within its limited and defined bounds, they are failing to secure the rights of the people. Thomas Jefferson articulates this danger in 1812:

“when all government, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another…If the States look with apathy on this silent descent of their government into the gulf which is to swallow all, we have only to weep over the human character formed uncontrollable but by a rod of iron…”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, KrisAnne Hall 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Greatest Power: Each State’s Obligation to Keep Its Creation of National Government in Check (Part 1) – Guest Essayist: KrisAnne Hall, KrisAnne Hall

Greatest Power: Each State’s Obligation to Keep Its Creation of National Government in Check (Part 1)

“Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.”

By RIGHT our governments are no longer colonies, but by declaration of that Right are recognized to be “free and independent States.” Simply put, we are not property of the king, but we know that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. Since we are not owned by the king, we need not ask his permission to be free, we must simply declare it. Through the Declaration of Independence we not only make this fact known to the world, but we give clear definition to what we mean when we created, “free and independent States.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable John Merrill 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Secretary of State: Role and Purpose on the State Level – Guest Essayist: The Honorable John Merrill, The Honorable John Merrill

Secretary of State: Role and Purpose on the State Level

Many of the executive records have both the signatures of the Secretary of State and the Governor because the Secretary of State serves as the Governor’s personal notary public. When the Secretary of State is witnessing the Governor’s signature, the Great Seal of Alabama is used as the “notary” seal. The executive records are composed of writs of arrest, contracts, deeds, and leases, as well as listings of abandoned vehicles found in the state, information on municipal incorporations, and the names of all the notaries publicly registered in Alabama.

The Secretary of State is Alabama’s “Chief Election Official,” and the office is given many different election duties under state law. Election records include vote totals, certified ballots, and records showing how much money candidates and political committees raised and spent during an election. Copies of certificates of election, commissions, and oaths of office are also on file for many elected officials.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Sean Beienburg 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Arizona: Born Angry – Guest Essayist: Sean Beienburg, Sean Beienburg

Arizona: Born Angry – Guest Essayist: Sean Beienburg

Not all states can say that their first public act was defying the president of the United States. Arizona, the last state admitted to the Union from the contiguous United States, can.

Like many westerners then and now, Arizonans were anxious about and skeptical of concentrations of power, especially power wielded from afar, and, in writing their constitution, they sought to see it widely dispersed. (In this, Arizona’s Founders were not unlike the American Founders, increasingly distressed at their local government affairs being directed from the metropole, in violation of what they understood their English liberties to guarantee.) This meant not only that the state government would be carefully limited and easily checked by the people, but also that its constitution would ensure private actors could not wield undue influence in the state.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Ken Paxton 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, The Honorable Ken Paxton, The Role of the State Attorney General – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Ken Paxton

The Role of the State Attorney General

State Attorneys General (AG) serve as the chief lawyers for their respective states and work to defend state sovereignty in a variety of contexts. They represent the interests of their states in court proceedings by defending state laws against legal challenges and, in many cases, enforcing state laws in both civil and criminal actions. They frequently are called upon to provide legal advice to state officials and to issue legal opinions on a range of issues. They also may oversee critical government programs, such as (in Texas) the state’s child support function.

While similar to their federal counterpart—the U.S. Attorney General—these state officers perform functions that vary greatly from the federal context, specifically in three ways.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Eric Wise 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Battle for Power Between the National Government and the States – Guest Essayist: J. Eric Wise, Eric Wise

Battle for Power Between the National Government and the States

Indeed, opponents of the Constitution had cited “Montesquieu on the necessity of a contracted territory for a republican government.” Federalist 9. A large territory, Montesquieu had supposed, encouraged a monarchy, as monarchies were more adept at communications over distance and operate on principles that do not require thorough familiarity with the governed (rather they require familiarity with a small body of subordinate princes). The Constitution resolved these issues by creating a federal republic, where local rule prevailed in areas touching the daily lives of the people.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Greg Davidson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Greg Davidson, The Unique Role of American State Governors – Guest Essayist: Greg Davidson

The Unique Role of American State Governors

To many, the position of state governor is a faint echo of the president of the United States. The president is in charge of a vast empire stretching coast to coast with global implications while governors are seen as mere presiders, not much more than little men running little fiefdoms perpetuating their own schemes for self-interest and self-aggrandizement.

That view, of course, is blatantly false. The position of governor in the American political system far predates the concept of a president, though the role of the American president is a noble position of service as first exemplified by George Washington who refused a crown to rule as king and instead chose to serve through a presidency. Governors in the American colonies maintained relations with overseas powers and oversaw the vast expansion of the American state. Governors oversaw massive political changes as state constitutional systems were created. Governors laid the foundation for the modern American state through their vision, leadership, and administration.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Apportionment and State Judiciaries, Joerg W. Knipprath

Apportionment and State Judiciaries

Unfortunately, the Court cast aside Justice Frankfurter’s warning that judges should stay out of the apportionment controversy and let the democratic process resolve it. Where wise men feared to tread, the justices foolishly rushed in. In 1962, in Baker v. Carr, they decided that such issues were “justiciable,” after all. Two years later, in Reynolds v. Sims, they decided that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment supplied the solution. All legislative districts, whether congressional, state legislative, or local, had to be equal in population to be constitutional. The history of the Equal Protection Clause contains no evidence that the Congress or the states intended it to address this issue. Indeed, section two of that amendment addresses a very specific instance of representation, that is, a state’s representation would be reduced in the House of Representatives by the proportion that it denied its adult male citizens the right to vote on racial grounds. The framers of the amendment were fully aware of political representation, yet did not consider the Equal Protection Clause itself applicable broadly to representation or voting.

Apportionment and State Constitutions

States also apportion their state legislative districts and determine how local electoral districts are apportioned. State constitutions typically provide for regular reapportionment and fix who–legislatures, courts, commissions–is to conduct that reapportionment. Local districts, such as county commissioners, school boards, and junior college districts, are included in this process, even if they perform multiple functions, as long as one of those functions is legislative and the body is elected by districts. The Supreme Court has recognized one exclusion, in Ball v. James (1981), for certain special governmental units that have only limited legislative powers, such as water districts. For those, voting and representation can be apportioned on the basis of amount of water rights or use, rather than population. The distinction between special and general governmental bodies is none-too-obvious, however.

Apportionment, Voting and Representation

In a republic, two distinct principles are essential to political influence, voting and representation. Although there is no logical connection between any particular systems of voting and representation, there is a practical overlap. It is not astonishing, therefore, that allocation of voting and representation not only have been addressed in all republican constitutions, ancient and modern, but that conflicts over these issues have flared up in American history. “No taxation without representation” was one potent Revolutionary War-era slogan–and continues to be an (avoidable) obsession with some residents of the District of Columbia and with its municipal government. That slogan arose out of fundamental differences between English and American conceptions of voting and representation that had evolved from the experiences of living under distinctive physical and social conditions.

Voting qualifications and representation have been major controversies in several periods of American history. The Philadelphia Convention in 1787 was deadlocked several weeks over the representational structure of the proposed Congress and nearly broke up over the matter before Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut presented the current compromise system. The constitutional upheaval of the second quarter of the 19th century during the “Age of Jackson” that produced numerous state conventions was triggered by popular restiveness over the outdated systems of voting and representation. One particularly tragic-comic event during that time was the Dorr War, a “civil war” in Rhode Island in 1841/2. It was precipitated by an attempt to reform the voting qualifications and legislative apportionment in place since the old colony’s royal charter had been made, with a few qualifications, the new state’s constitution at independence. Once more, in the 1960s, voting and representation became major constitutional issues. This time the matter was addressed through litigation in courts, rather less democratic than constitutional conventions and less dramatic than civil wars, no matter how small.

City Leadership: Two Case Studies

Greenwich, Connecticut, where I live today, began as a colony founded in 1640 by a group of Englishmen that included daughter-in-law of John Winthrop, the founder of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and author of the famous “city on a hill” sermon. While the Town of Greenwich, population 61,000, is old, its modern charter arrived in 1975. The charter is filled with provisions for budgets, elections, flood control, health, home rule, ordinances, parks and recreation, zoning, parking, public works, sewers, a board of estimation and taxes, a town council, selectmen (think mayors and deputy mayors), and a town clerk.

As this litany of charter provisions shows, a town or city touches almost every aspect of the daily life of its people. Whether you are driving on a road, visiting a park, waving to a policeman directing traffic, taking in the bustle of your local commercial district, or simply parking your car, you are working with your city government and your city government is working for you. A city government is always busy making a great many households into one community, into its own little “city on a hill” as John Winthrop would have said. A city government not only must do all these things – imagine a world without police or firemen, or in the case of Greenwich, public beaches! – it must also pay for them.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Clay Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Clay Williams, Mississippi’s Road to Statehood – Guest Essayist: Clay Williams

Mississippi’s Road to Statehood

Mississippi followed a long, winding path to reach statehood. Following thousands of years of various Native Americans inhabiting the landscape, European powers burst upon the scene in the 1500s. Between then and the late 1700s, Spain, France and England had all claimed at least portions of the area we now know of as Mississippi. When the fledgling United States acquired the area in the late eighteenth century, it took nearly twenty years before Mississippi became this nation’s twentieth state.

Congress established the Mississippi Territory on April 7, 1798. Spain had claimed a large portion of the area but had given up much of its rights by 1795. Initially, this region consisted of a strip of land between the Mississippi and Chattahoochee Rivers but by 1812, it encompassed all of the present-day states of Mississippi and Alabama. The territorial government consisted of a governor, three judges and a secretary who served as a ruling council. Once the population level reached a certain number, the territory could apply for the second territorial stage which included an elected assembly and a delegate to Congress. Eventually, a territory could apply for statehood.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Peter Roff 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Peter Roff, The Nation’s Capital: The District of Columbia

The Nation’s Capital: The District of Columbia

The machinations behind the scenes that resulted in the Residence Act are perhaps the first great compromise of the new Republic. The northern states did not want the capital in the South. The southern states did not want it in the North. And no state wanted it located within the confines of any other, thinking it would give that state an unfair advantage in the affairs of the new nation.

As they saw it, the independence of the capital city from the governments of the other states was an additional safeguard of our liberties and of the new system of government created by the U.S. Constitution based on checks and balances of power not just between the three branches of the federal government but between the federal government and the states.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Home Rule or Dillon Rule? Meaning and Purpose for Effective Local Government, Marc Clauson

Home Rule or Dillon Rule? Meaning and Purpose for Effective Local Government

If a particular power is allowed (under whichever rule), it still should not be an unlimited power. Moreover, not all powers are legitimate for any given local government or for any such government. Under current law of local government, it is incumbent on the state legislatures to create institutional arrangements that do limit power, or that appropriate state constitutional limits be in place.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Down-Ballot Elections, Scot Faulkner

Down-Ballot Elections

Every year elections are held in the United States.

Federal and state elections every other year (except a few states who are truly “off-year” outside of the two-year cycle). Local elections, county and municipal, are held somewhere every year.

There are approximately 88,000 local governments, districts, and commissions containing over 500,000 elected officials.

Many local offices are nonpartisan, meaning not party affiliated. School Boards and small cities and towns assume local functions are not truly partisan. Is there a Republican or Democrat way of collecting trash or plowing snow?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Tim Griffin 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Arkansas: A Brief History of Statehood, The Honorable Tim Griffin

Arkansas: A Brief History of Statehood

Arkansas is governed under its 1874 constitution, which is its fifth since statehood, and commonly known as the “Thou Shalt Not” document. It reflected the general suspicion of government power that had been prevalent in the state since entering the Union. Most of these revisions placed into the document were highly restrictive and negative in nature. County governments became more powerful as administrative units of the state, with jurisdiction over roads and bridges, local judiciary, and taxation and spending. The state’s powers to tax and borrow were severely limited, the terms of elected officials were reduced from four years to two years (changed to four years by a constitutional amendment in 1984), the number of elected county officials was increased from two to ten, and the legislative sessions were biennial, limited to sixty days. The governor’s power was greatly reduced, and executive power was divided between seven constitutional officers.

Counties: Backbone of Local Government, Core of Our Civic Culture

Most Americans have poor awareness and understanding of local government. The decisions and activities of the diverse array of elected and appointed officials go unreported, or under-reported. Holding local power accountable is one of the greatest problems in America today.

Corruption and incompetence are more prevalent than ever. Land use can make or break fortunes, and help or harm a community, especially in the wrong hands. Unfortunately, conflicts of interest are predictable around land speculation. Misuse of public funds, especially directing contracts to friends and family, or for unrecorded payments, is always possible.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Randall T. Shepard 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Indiana: Long an Example of Robust Statehood, The Honorable Randall T. Shepard

Indiana: Long an Example of Robust Statehood

Formation of today’s traditional Midwest took root in the years after the Treaty of Paris ended the conflict known to Europeans as the Seven Years War, known in America as the French and Indiana War. Signed in 1763, this resolution gave the British nominal control over the land from the Atlantic to the Mississippi. During the Revolution, Indiana was the site of a battle for Fort Sackville, at Vincennes. As American forces took the fort, they turned toward an effort driving out the British out of places like Illinois and Michigan, the ultimate objective being Detroit.

After the war, the much-maligned Continental Congress took important steps in organizing these areas. They adopted the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, with the idea that Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan would eventually be divided into five states of the union. From the time Ohio became a state in 1803, Indiana’s leaders were hard at work on achieving this end.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, David B. Kopel 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, David B. Kopel, The Sovereignty of a Free and Radically Independent People: Colorado’s Enduring Constitutional Heritage

The Sovereignty of a Free and Radically Independent People: Colorado’s Enduring Constitutional Heritage

Early Colorado never devolved into the anarchy that had characterized California in its own early gold rush years. Because about thirty percent of Colorado’s miners had experience in California, they understood the importance of creating effective local self-government immediately. Thus, the miners’ districts were quickly established. Experienced code writers traveled from town to town, helping to create local law.

Defying the nominal authority of the Kansas territorial government, the settlers in September and October 1859 created their own ad hoc government for what they called the “Territory of Jefferson.” Provisional Governor Robert Steele addressed the opening of the Jefferson legislature on November 7, 1859. He explained that the people had been denied protection of life and property; being sovereign, they had taken measures for their security.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Louis Fisher 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors, Louis Fisher

Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors

Consider some recent examples of the Court admitting errors on constitutional issues. In United States v. Curtiss-Wright (1936), the Court upheld a statute that delegated to President Franklin D. Roosevelt authority to prohibit the sale of arms in the Chaco region in South America whenever he found “it may contribute to the reestablishment of peace” between belligerents. The Court then added extraneous language (judicial dicta), claiming that the President possesses “plenary and exclusive” power over foreign affairs and serves as the “sole organ” in external affairs. Anyone reading the text of the Constitution would understand that the Framers did not place all power over external affairs in the President. Clearly that power is allocated to both Congress and the President.

Judicial Finality: Protecting Individual Rights

In 1916, Congress passed legislation to regulate child labor in interstate commerce. Two years later, in Hammer v. Dagenhart, a 5-4 Supreme Court struck down the statute as unconstitutional. Congress did not accept judicial finality. It passed legislation to regulate child labor, relying this time on the taxing power. In Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. (1922), an 8-1 decision struck down that legislative effort. Congress passed a constitutional amendment in 1924 to provide authority under the commerce power to regulate child labor, but by 1937 only 28 of the necessary 36 states had ratified it.

Instead of accepting judicial finality, Congress passed legislation in 1938 to regulate child labor through the commerce power. In 1941, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the statute. As to its decision in 1918, the Court remarked that it “was novel when made and unsupported by any provision in the Constitution.” A remarkable statement. Not a shred of constitutional support. The Court in 1941 repudiated not only the doctrine of judicial finality but the assumption of judicial infallibility. The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate commerce are matters, said the Court, “for the legislative judgment upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control.”

Judicial Finality: Is There a Final Word on Constitutional Issues?

According to the doctrine of judicial finality, the Supreme Court has the last word in interpreting the Constitution unless it changes its mind or the Constitution is amended. This doctrine, widely accepted, has no basis in the historical record. In part, that is because the Court, as with the other political branches, makes mistakes. Chief Justice William Rehnquist expressed the reason quite crisply in Herrera v. Brown (1993): “It is an unalterable fact that our judicial system, like the human beings who administer it, is fallible.” As this article will explain, when the Court errs it can take six or more decades to recognize a judicial error and announce a correction.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Scot Faulkner “All Politics is Local”, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner

“All Politics is Local”

de Tocqueville links local government to being fundamental to a free people:

In the township, as well as everywhere else, the people are the only source of power; but in no stage of government does the body of citizens exercise a more immediate influence. In America ‘the people’ is a master whose exigencies demand obedience to the utmost limits of possibility.

Municipal independence is therefore a natural consequence of the principle of the sovereignty of the people in the United States: all the American republics recognize it more or less;

de Tocqueville noted the benefits of locally focused government in America:

In no country in the world do the citizens make such exertions for the common weal; and I am acquainted with no people which has established schools as numerous and as efficacious, places of public worship better suited to the wants of the inhabitants, or roads kept in better repair.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Gordon Lloyd, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Gordon Lloyd PhD, Their Common Defense: Alliance Between the Sovereign States

Their Common Defense: Alliance Between the Sovereign States

The “alliance” between the “sovereign states” was on behalf of their “common defense, the securities of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of the them….”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, California, September 9, 1850: Thirty-First Admitted to the United States (Part 2), Joerg W. Knipprath

California, September 9, 1850: Thirty-First Admitted to the United States (Part 2)

The earlier version followed the path of traditional American constitutional structure, with its basic organization of government and its “natural rights” approach.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter, Home Rule or Dillon Rule?

Home Rule or Dillon Rule?

The states of the United States were intended to be, essentially, laboratories within which “experiments” in government could be tried. The Tenth Amendment supports this view, stating that whatever political power was not delegated to the national government remained with the states and their people. Whether Home Rule or Dillon’s Rule or some combination of both will win out remains to be seen. In any case, the idea of a self-ruling people demands that the decision not be left to the politicians.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, California, September 9, 1850: Thirty-First Admitted to the United States (Part 1), Joerg W. Knipprath

California, September 9, 1850: Thirty-First Admitted to the United States (Part 1)

California has had two constitutions during statehood, one from 1849 and the other from 1879. Although only a generation separates them, their style, operative principles, and political consequences could hardly be more different. The Constitution of 1849 represented the classic American constitutionalism of the U.S. Constitution and of the Iowa and New York state constitutions that were its direct antecedents. The Constitution of 1879 bore the imprint of the wave of political populism sweeping the country during that decade. Together with subsequent amendments adopted during the Progressive Era, it became–and remains–an instrument of that time and contributes to the state’s radical politics.

Lower Courts: How Local Judiciary Systems Work

State courts play a vital role in our nation’s legal system. If you are ever a party to a lawsuit or are called as a trial witness, it will likely be in a state court. Without the fifty state court systems the federal court system would be overwhelmed. State courts are usually easy to locate and provide a great opportunity to introduce school children to the U.S. legal system.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Founders’ Purpose: America's State and Local Form of Government as Guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, Marc Clauson

Founders’ Purpose: America’s State and Local Form of Government as Guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution

The idea of a republican government was raised at the Constitutional Convention in the atmosphere of the just-ended War for Independence. The primary target of the signers of the Declaration has been the English king, who was designated a tyrant. This same target lies in the background in discussions of the governmental form.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Role of State Courts and the American Judicial System (Part 2)

Role of State Courts and the American Judicial System (Part 2)

A wave of state constitutional conventions during the middle of the 19th century reflected the increased “democratization” of American politics that resulted in the election of President Andrew Jackson and the emergence of two modern national programmatic parties, the Democrats and the Whigs. In established and newly-formed states, the growing movement for popular control over government led to reforms of judicial systems by having judges run for political office under partisan aegis and denomination. Today, eight states retain some form of partisan election for their appellate courts, and more do so for their general trial courts.

By the late nineteenth century, the tide turned again, with partisan politics becoming identified with political corruption, urban political “machines,” and party bosses controlling the process from “smoke-filled back rooms.” Over the next several decades, reformers, often working under the label of “Progressivism,” pushed broadly for nonpartisan elections, including for judicial offices. Most new states, as well as some established states, adopted this system in the several decades beginning in the 1880s. About one-third of the states still have nonpartisan elections for their appellate courts; still more do so for their general trial courts.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Role of State Courts and the American Judicial System (Part 1)

Role of State Courts and the American Judicial System (Part 1)

Under the Constitution, the only required court is the U.S. Supreme Court. The creation of lower federal courts has always been entirely at the discretion of Congress. Even if federal courts have jurisdiction, they can only hear cases specified in Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution. They are “limited jurisdiction” courts. However, the Constitution does anticipate the existence of state courts, which, in addition to their duties under state law, would perform the functions of federal jurisdiction if Congress chose not to establish lower federal courts. Even today, state courts can hear cases that involve federal jurisdiction, such as claims that arise under federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution, unless Congress has expressly made hearing that type of case exclusive in the federal courts.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, State Supreme Courts

State Supreme Courts

The state and local courts generally address and rule on cases and controversies that involve law and the constitution of that state. However, in some instances, those state court rulings can be appealed and challenged in the federal courts. If the issue is whether a state law violates the Constitution, then federal courts may hear the dispute. In addition, in some instances, if the jurisdictional thresholds are met, then there might be dual jurisdiction.

The federal and state courts are separate entities with different jurisdictional limits and powers. While state issues might be litigated in federal courts if jurisdictional requirements are satisfied, United States Constitutional issues are ultimately the federal courts to decide. The Founders at the national and state levels expected the third branch, while co-equal to the other branches, to be the least powerful branch and interpreters only of laws.

The States and America’s Republican Form of Government

To the Framers of the Constitution, democracy was a hideous form of government. The colorful Fisher Ames, in one of his more measured criticisms, wrote: “Democracy, in its best state, is but the politics of Bedlam; while kept chained, its thoughts are frantic, but when it breaks loose, it kills the keeper, fires the building, and perishes.” Monarchy was obviously unacceptable; a confederation had been tried and found wanting; this left a republic. But a republic which, according to Dr. Benjamin Franklin, must be “kept.” The Constitution’s Article 4 Section 4 contributes to the “keeping.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Bethany Marcum, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Alaska: The Last Frontier, Bethany Marcum

Alaska: The Last Frontier

While there are in theory strict limits on federal governing powers as laid out in the Tenth Amendment to our U.S. Constitution, in the real world of at least one state, Alaska, the federal government wields enormous power and control. To understand how this came to be, one must look at Alaska’s history.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Bleeding Kansas and Four Constitutions, Tony Williams

Bleeding Kansas and Four Constitutions

The following year, Kansans adopted the Wyandotte Constitution, which was approved by Congress in 1860 as the South seceded. Congress finally admitted Kansas as a free state and banned slavery on January 29, 1861. It was the 34th state in the Union. This constitution opened with a preamble asserting the significance of civil and religious liberty: “We, the people of Kansas, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious privileges, in order to insure the full enjoyment of our rights as American citizens, do ordain and establish the Constitution of the State of Kansas.” The constitution remains the constitution of Kansas though it has been amended since ratification including the addition of women’s suffrage.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, The Frontier Closes: Foreign Policy and the Status of the States (Part 2), William Morrisey PhD

The Frontier Closes: Foreign Policy and the Status of the States (Part 2)

Such radically changed circumstances, which would lead to the world wars of the next century, presented American strategists with a set of problems noticeably different from those seen by Washington and his successors. Would the strengthening empires block American trade? Would they again threaten American shores, as they had not done since 1812?

Further, having fought a devastating civil war, we were less likely than ever to invite the prospect of another war on our own territory—especially given the increasingly devastating power of modern weapon wielded by the well-organized and trained mass armies raised by modern states.

We needed to re-think the question of strategic depth, a question we thought we’d answered by turning the middle part of North America into an empire of liberty. And we also needed to re-think our policies regarding international commerce. All without eradicating the constitutionally legitimate powers of the state governments.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, The Frontier Closes: Foreign Policy and the Status of the States (Part 1), William Morrisey PhD

The Frontier Closes: Foreign Policy and the Status of the States (Part 1)

America became what Jefferson wanted it to be: an “empire of liberty,” that is, a union of free and equal states, with republican regimes securing the natural rights of all its citizens in principle and of most if not all in practice.

What would become of the country? Could the regime of commercial republicanism sustain itself against populist and socialist ideologues who sought to exploit these pressures? Could federalism withstand pressures to ‘nationalize’ everything—that is, bring it under the rule of the central government to the diminution of the state governments?

Territories of the United States

To date, fifty states have been admitted to the United States, with the last one, Hawaii, having been admitted on August 21, 1959. However, in addition to the states, the United States has a number of major territories, including American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 8. The Congress, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, Wyoming: The First State To Grant Voting Rights To Women

Wyoming: The First State To Grant Voting Rights To Women

In 1888, the Territorial Assembly petitioned Congress for statehood, but that effort was not successful. Despite not being approved for statehood in 1888, Wyoming Territory Governor Francis E. Warren and other territorial leadership decided to hold an election for delegates to a constitutional convention. On September 30, 1889, the Constitutional Convention was held and a state constitution was drafted that was submitted to voters. A short time later, on November 5,1889, the constitution was approved by an overwhelming majority of Wyoming voters, 6,272 to 1,923.

With a new constitution, the Wyoming Territory pushed for statehood again, and after President Benjamin Harrison signed Wyoming’s statehood bill, Wyoming became the 44th state on July 10,1890.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Role of State and Local Government and the Bill of Rights

Role of State and Local Government and the Bill of Rights

The initial set of amendments drafted by Representative James Madison were distilled from those submitted by the various state ratifying conventions, with the author declaring to Congress “I shall not propose a single alteration but is likely to meet the concurrence required by the constitution.” While most of those changes dealt with the powers of the general government or with limits to be imposed on that body, one group did not. Hamilton had also criticized the fact that the New York constitution, like that of some other states, lacked an explicit bill of rights. If anything, he noted, states needed bills of rights more than the federal government did, because they were governments of general and inherent legislative power, while the federal government was one of limited and delegated powers. For the former, then, any restriction on its powers had to be express.

The Bill Of Rights and the States

Congressmen in the summer of 1789 were well aware that the constitution of nearly every state predated the new U.S. Constitution and that they had been working well. Almost all of them contained either Declarations of Rights or specific protections in the body of the constitution; some of these protections were more elaborate even than those which ended up in the U.S. Bill of Rights.[4]…

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Langer, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, The Lands Forming Nevada as America’s Thirty-Sixth State at the Height of the Civil War

The Lands Forming Nevada as America’s Thirty-Sixth State at the Height of the Civil War

The relationship between Nevada and the federal government is as much a matter of the history of how Nevada became a state as it is the conditions under which it was granted statehood. Like many western states, states whose territories were carved out of the lands gained by the United States as a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848.

Until that point, states entering the union retained title to “unappropriated public lands” within their boundaries. But states entering the Union after 1848, by and large, ceded all title to these unappropriated public lands—i.e., lands that were neither privately owned, nor were they dedicated to some official public purpose—to the federal government as an incident of their becoming a state. As a result, these states, which were also much, much larger than their eastern counterparts, came into the Union with massive amounts of federal land within their midst.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Anthony Sanders, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Anthony Sanders, Divided by a River and a Convention: Minnesota’s Constitutional Heritage

Divided by a River and a Convention: Minnesota’s Constitutional Heritage

Minnesota’s constitutional roots go all the way back to before the adoption of the U.S. Constitution.

As Minnesotans will tell you, the state is the source of the Mississippi river. The land east of the river was recognized as part of the United States in 1783, after the United States won the Revolutionary War. A few years later in 1787, Congress, acting under the Articles of Confederation, drafted the Northwest Ordinance. The Ordinance included a set of requirements for new states to be formed out of the Northwest Territory, the area which today includes Minnesota east of the Mississippi, as well as Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It required new states to guarantee many individual liberties, including freedom of religion, freedom of navigation on public waterways, and the prohibition of slavery.

West Virginia: The Thirty-Fifth State

On August 20, 1861, President Lincoln empowered this military-backed civilian entity to establishment the separate state of West Virginia from the pro-Union western counties that opted-out of the Secession Convention.

A “free” state convention met in Wheeling, November 26, 1861, and drafted the “Constitution of West Virginia.” It designated forty-four counties, “formerly part of the State of Virginia,” to be “included in and form part of the State of West Virginia.” The Counties of Pendleton, Hardy, Hampshire, Morgan, Frederick, Berkeley, or Jefferson were not named as part of the state.

The Constitutional Intrigue of West Virginia Statehood

The “Restored Government,” acting in accordance with Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, passed a resolution allowing the counties of northwest Virginia to split off and form their own state called West Virginia. Before West Virginia is admitted to the Union as a distinct state (in 1863) there were actually three separate governments operating within the confines of the state of Virginia: one part of the confederacy, one part of the Union and one hopeful of becoming a separate state. The “Restored Government” approved a new constitution in 1864. Since this constitution was enacted under wartime conditions and the “Restored Government” stood on rather shaky ground to begin with, the 1864 constitution is not recognized as part of the constitutional history of Virginia.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights contains a statement that “all [political] power is … derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.” When “the people” delegate their sovereign power to a government, is that a one-way trip, is the power forever surrendered? No, no, a thousand times no! Virginia’s Ratification Convention of the U.S. Constitution in 1788 made this crystal clear by writing: “WE the Delegates of the people of Virginia…, DO in the name and in behalf of the people of Virginia, declare and make known that the powers granted under the Constitution, being derived from the people of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression.”

How much political power did the “Restored Government of Virginia” actually enjoy?

Louisiana and the Clash of Empires

The issue was finally settled in the fall of 1795 with Europe in flames due to the wars of the French Revolution. Thomas Pinckney of South Carolina negotiated Pinckney’s Treaty which won additional territory in Spanish Florida and more importantly secured the American right of free navigation of the Mississippi and New Orleans to trade.

When Spain ceded the Louisiana Territory to France in 1800, Americans were concerned about Napoleonic designs in North America. However, the continuing wars in Europe and the French failure to suppress a slave rebellion in Saint-Domingue (Haiti) led Napoleon to consider selling the territory to the United States. President Jefferson dispatched New Yorker Robert Livingston and Virginian James Monroe to negotiate the purchase of New Orleans as a critically-important port.

July 3, 1890: “We, the People of the State of Idaho”

The “Idaho Admission Bill” reads: “Therefore, Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representative of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the State of Idaho is hereby declared to be a State of the United States of America, and is hereby declared admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever; and that the Constitution which the people of Idaho have formed for themselves be and the same is hereby, accepted, ratified and confirmed.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best, Nebraska’s State Constitution and One-Of-A-Kind Unicameral Legislature

Nebraska’s State Constitution and One-Of-A-Kind Unicameral Legislature

In 1776, the world was ruled by royalty. Then some upstart colonialists penned the most revolutionary document in the history of man. The Declaration of Independence flipped the world upside down. The Divine Right of Kings became the consent of the governed. The individual was now “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” This was a world-shattering concept.

The people were now in charge. Our national heritage is a written constitution that sets the rules for governance between the people and their elected representatives. When Pilgrims landed at Plymouth, they almost immediately sat down and wrote a constitution called the Mayflower Compact. When our forefathers wanted independence, they felt a need to express their grievances and philosophy of government in a written Declaration of Independence. At the time of the Constitutional Convention, all thirteen states had written constitutions.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Sam Houston 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Sam Houston, Texas: A Unique History Which Impacted Its Constitutional Future

Texas: A Unique History Which Impacted Its Constitutional Future

While the states which comprise the United States of America each have a unique story and history, the political and constitutional evolution of the great state of Texas is a compelling story in and of itself. I know, for you non-Texans your first response might be “there goes another one of those Texans who believes everything about Texas is bigger, brighter, bolder and more significant than everyplace else in the world”! Admittedly, true Texans are unabashedly proud. They hold an opinion which tends to advance the idea Texas is first in everything and the rest of the world can at best be “first runner up.” However, when one considers the fascinating history of Texas, the uniqueness of her size and the role she played in the growth and development of the United States, her role cannot be overlooked even by the most objective analysis.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Founders’ Vision for Keeping the States Strong, United, and Free (Part 2), Joerg W. Knipprath

Founders’ Vision for Keeping the States Strong, United, and Free (Part 2)

After the adoption of the Constitution, the next significant use of this compact theory occurred in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798/9, authored by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, respectively, and triggered by the Adams Administration’s Sedition Act. These resolutions held that Congress had only limited and delegated powers. If Congress legislated beyond those powers, it invaded the reserved powers of the states and threatened to consolidate power in itself. Division of powers existed to protect the people’s rights against tyranny.

A state government could, perhaps even must, then declare the unconstitutional nature of the Congressional action. Beyond that, matters got murky. The means of redress were left to each state. For Virginia, this included interposition of state authority between its citizens and Congressional usurpation of their rights. Whether this went beyond seeking political change by pressuring Congress to repeal the law or petitioning that body to call a constitutional convention under Article V of the Constitution, to actively using state executive authority to prevent enforcement of the federal law, was not discussed. Though it was implied, there was no clear assertion that the state’s action (by itself or in concurrence with others) outright nullified the offensive law. The more radical Jefferson, however, did allow that a state could nullify the offending federal law within its territory.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Founders’ Vision for Keeping the States Strong, United, and Free (Part 1), Joerg W. Knipprath

Founders’ Vision for Keeping the States Strong, United, and Free (Part 1)

The constitutional case for vigorous state sovereignty to counter the dangers from a consolidated general government had been made frequently by the Constitution’s critics during the ratification debates. Their claim rested on the principle that the union was a compact of States. They pointed to the fact that the Constitution’s legitimacy rested on approval by the states; that the Constitution’s proponents frequently had asserted that the plan was not a revolutionary new system but an improvement of the extant one, as expressed in the Preamble’s objective to “form a more perfect Union;” and that failure to adopt the new plan would not mean the creation of 13 fully independent entities, but, rather, continuation of the earlier plan that had established a “perpetual union.”

The shift from approval by the state legislatures under the Articles of Confederation to approval by state conventions under the proposed document merely reflected a more refined understanding of republican theory that fundamental alterations must reflect as clearly as practicable the consent of the governed.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Val Crofts “On Wisconsin!”, 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Val Crofts

“On Wisconsin!”

Today’s Wisconsin Constitution consists of a Preamble, thanking Almighty God for the freedoms that citizens of the state are blessed with, and then 14 Articles. The first article is a general declaration of rights as citizens of Wisconsin. This allows Wisconsin citizens to live under the same freedoms as the United States Bill of Rights, to prohibit prison sentences for debt, place military under the control of civil authorities, and guarantees our citizens the right to fish and hunt.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Missouri Statehood and the First Sirens of Civil War, Sam Postell

Missouri Statehood and the First Sirens of Civil War

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives began to speak of Maine’s admission to statehood. The first day of deliberation upon Maine, Henry Clay left the Speaker’s chair in order to set the stage for debate. He wanted to assure the Northerners that they had much to lose with the debates over Maine if they continued to give the Southerners ultimatums regarding Missouri. If Maine could not be accepted as a state, then the Northerners would lose any opportunity of equaling the Southern representation in the Senate, and this could have long term consequences.

Illinois, Admitted December 3, 1818 as the Twenty-First State

Admitted to the Union December 3, 1818, Illinois is the twenty-first state to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Known as “The Prairie State” as well as the “Land of Lincoln,” the Illinois State Constitution adopted in 1970 is the version currently used. The first state constitution, however, was adopted on August 26, 1818.

Congress required that each new state have a constitution. Delegates were selected and they met in Kaskaskia, Illinois, thirty-three men gathered at a tavern to draft a constitution. Borrowing heavily from the Kentucky constitution, where many delegates had come to Illinois from, as well as the constitutions of Ohio and Indiana (two states that were part of the Northwest Territory), a very small group drafted the constitution. Except for one issue, there are not records of much debate over this constitution to be submitted to Congress.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, How Ohio Crafted Its State Constitution to Uphold the Will of the People, Sam Postell

How Ohio Crafted Its State Constitution to Uphold the Will of the People

The study of state constitutions is perhaps the most important study that Americans can undertake, yet the most neglected. Understanding the constitution of the state within which one holds residence is important for two reasons. First, because understanding the laws closest to oneself equips one to become a citizen in the truest sense, one who participates in the city with his fellow citizens and engages in the community. And second because the state constitutions, in preserving the past while being layered by amendments of the present, reveal the history and development of the American regime.

Ohio’s state constitution is paradigmatic in the latter sense. The Buckeye State was the 17th state to join the Union, and it was accepted to statehood in 1803. The year in which Ohio was accepted to statehood is important insofar as it forms the essential character of the Ohio Constitution: joining a mere 27 years after the nation declared independence, and a mere 14 years after the Federal Constitution’s ratification, it preserves much of what was original to the Union itself. However, the Ohio Constitution, being ratified after the election of 1800, just after the first major shift in party control, gives Ohio an important place in the new notions of politics that developed during Jefferson’s term as president.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Robin Smith 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Tennessee, 1796: The Volunteer State, The Honorable Robin Smith

Tennessee, 1796: The Volunteer State

It’s now understandable why the Tennessee Historical Magazine of 1915 features a writing entitled, “The Development of the Tennessee Constitution” with the subtitle, “The North Carolina Constitution of 1776” with the first line to read: The constitutional history of Tennessee properly begins with the adoption by the revolutionary congress of North Carolina, in 1776… The appointed governor of Tennessee immediately following the acceptance of the cessation papers by the U.S. Government in 1790 was William Blount, who served from 1790 until official statehood in 1796 in what was deemed the “Southwest Territory.”

During this time a 4-week convention comprised of 55 delegates was held in Knoxville to establish the first constitution of a new state. Upon completion, the governing document was sent to Philadelphia, home to young America’s seat of governance, for review by the U.S. Congress and ultimately signed by President George Washington giving Tennessee immediate statehood on its day of birth, June 1, 1796. It would be later said by Thomas Jefferson of Tennessee’s Constitution, based on its North Carolina’s parent and Pennsylvania’s, to be “the least imperfect and most republican of the state constitutions” as it featured specifics on rights, taxes and legislative authority.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William J. Federer 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Vermont, 1791: First State Admitted After the Original Thirteen Colonies, William J. Federer

Vermont, 1791: First State Admitted After the Original Thirteen Colonies

In 1775, just three weeks after the Revolutionary War Battles of Lexington and Concord, Ethan Allen led 83 Green Mountain Boys of Vermont on a courageous expedition to capture Fort Ticonderoga. In the early morning of MAY 10, 1775, Ethan Allen, accompanied by Colonel Benedict Arnold, made a surprise assault on Fort Ticonderoga. The bewildered British captain asked in whose name such a request was being made. Ethan Allen reportedly shouted: “In the Name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress.” The British surrendered in what was one of America’s first victories of the Revolutionary War.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Equality of States: The National Union and the Republican Principle, Tony Williams

Equality of States: The National Union and the Republican Principle

LISTEN ON SOUNDCLOUD: Ratified in 1781, the Articles of Confederation had significant problems. The Congress was unicameral, and the national government did not have an independent executive or judiciary. The states were sovereign, and the national government did not have the power to tax or regulate commerce. It was essentially just a league of friendship. […]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Anna Manning, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Anna Manning, North Carolina’s Vital Role in Ensuring The People Had a Bill of Rights

North Carolina’s Vital Role in Ensuring The People Had a Bill of Rights

Aside from the federal Constitution, North Carolina has had three state constitutions since separation from Great Britain. One in 1776, one in 1868, and one in 1971.

Although different, the North Carolina constitutions have similar passages, and it is evident how elements of the 1776 constitution were incorporated into the 1868 constitution and how many parts of the 1868 constitution were incorporated into the 1971 constitution. Each version has a Declaration of Rights, albeit the number of declarations is different. All three, however, include a reminder that the study of history can affect current policy: “a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD, Rhode Island: The Small Colony That Solidified the United States

Rhode Island: The Small Colony That Solidified the United States

What the history of Rhode Island reminds us is that the states that formed the Union understood themselves to be acting on behalf of their citizens and the state government. It was thirteen individual states who formed the Union and not the people of those states. The Union did not transform the people into a single-collective, but rather the people were citizens of their states and the states acted on behalf of their citizens at the national forum. This may seem radical in light of how most people view themselves today, but at the time they would have thought our modern construction as radical and a severe departure from the Spirit of 1776 that rebelled against a distant, centralized governing body that limited self-rule. The Spirit of 1776 also saw the former colonies declaring themselves independent individually rather than as a collective.

The actions of the colonies preceded the collective Declaration of Independence. A righteous act of independence had begun with Rhode Island and the nation solidified only when it became the last of the original thirteen to join the union.

New York: Eleventh of the Original Thirteen to Become a State in the Union

Like the 10th state, Virginia, while New York’s ratification was not required under the new Constitution for there to be a United States, had the vote gone the other way, the United States may have been for naught before they began. The Empire State showed its wealth of wisdom in ratifying the United States and becoming the 11th state in a fledgling nation. Had New York insisted on its voluminous amendments to the draft U.S. Constitution or that a Bill of Rights be passed with any ratification, and four votes had gone the other way, we might well have never moved to fifty states. Thankfully, we will never know.

But New York was extremely influential in the Bill of Rights being considered, including the powerful 10th Amendment, which provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” With the 9th Amendment, the intent was to limit the powers of the federal government.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Steve Armstrong 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Steve Armstrong, The Constitutional Roots of Connecticut

The Constitutional Roots of Connecticut

Connected is called the “Constitution State”, largely because of the Fundamental Orders, which were written by the Connecticut Colony Council in 1639. Some have argued that this is the first constitution (a few historians say in the entire world) that empowers the citizens of a state to govern themselves. Where other American colonies in the 1600s and early 1700s were largely governed by representatives from Great Britain, citizens of Connecticut practiced a form of self-government. The Fundamental Orders also outlined individual rights that were given to all Connecticut citizens.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Republican Principles of the 1776 Virginia Constitution, Tony Williams

Republican Principles of the 1776 Virginia Constitution

On June 29, the convention adopted a constitution guided by revolutionary principles. The different branches of government were separated and consisted of a bicameral General Assembly, an executive, and judiciary. The House of Delegates was the most representative of the people and were elected annually. The two houses of the legislature voted for the governor and curtailed the power of the executive who was elected annually and could not serve more than three terms consecutively. The principles of 1776 and great suspicion of executive power because of the experience under the king and his royal governors underpinned the weakening of executive power.

The Virginia Constitution was one of the first modern constitutions and represented the republican and revolutionary principles of 1776. The state constitutions created republican governments and helped shape the experiences and principles that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

How Virginia’s State Constitution Would Impact Construction of the United States Constitution

Before the Declaration of Independence was made, Virginia adopted its state Constitution on June 29, 1776, and its document would be of major impact when the new nation turned to creating a Constitution of its own.

Mason, who had a large role in the drafting of the Constitution in Philadelphia, and who was one of three delegates still in Philadelphia in September who did not sign the Constitution, was one of the main drafters of the 1776 Virginia Constitution. The other was Madison, who is considered by many to be the Father of the Constitution for his work in connection with the Annapolis Convention, the Bill of Rights and the Constitutional Convention. Madison would take his learnings from Virginia a decade later when he helped design the United States Constitution.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, The Honorable Bill O'Brien 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, New Hampshire: The First in the Nation, The Honorable Bill O'Brien

New Hampshire: The First in the Nation

Under fire from the troops defending the fort, these New Hampshire patriots captured the fort and its garrison, took down the British colors, seized most of the gunpowder and departed. When the royal governor the next day regarrisoned the fort and ordered the return of the gunpowder, the insurgents went back to Fort William and Mary and took the remaining gunpowder, plus 16 cannons and all the muskets.

On January 5, 1776, the then provincial Congress of New Hampshire recognized that with the royal governor and British troops having been chased out of the state, the time had come to adopt a state constitution derived not from royal prerogative or British parliamentary grant, but rather from the free suffrage of the people. In doing so and by means of that very first constitution, New Hampshire became the first of the 13 original colonies to declare its independence from the Great Britain – six months before the Declaration of Independence was signed.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Charles F. Vaughan 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Charles F. Vaughan, South Carolina, Admitted 1788 and Eighth State to Ratify the U.S. Constitution

South Carolina, Admitted 1788 and Eighth State to Ratify the U.S. Constitution

The eighth state to ratify the U.S. Constitution, South Carolina, was admitted to the United States May 23, 1788. It was also the first state to secede from the Union. The current South Carolina State Constitution was adopted in 1896.

Albemarle Point, located on the Ashley River, was established in 1670 as the first permanent English settlement in South Carolina. It was under the supervision of the eight lords proprietors who had been granted “Carolana” by King Charles II. Ten years later, settlers moved across the river to the present site of Charleston.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Kyle Scott, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Kyle Scott PhD, Secession? America’s Founding and Why States Seceded From the Union

Secession? America’s Founding and Why States Seceded From the Union

“At the time of the nation’s founding the states considered themselves to be sovereign entities that could compact together to address common needs, and it could reverse that decision if the common governing body no longer fulfilled its duty. Sovereignty was not relinquished. This is not only documented, but procedurally it is reinforced in that each state needed to ratify the primary governing documents before those documents took effect within that state’s legal jurisdiction. For instance, the U.S. Constitution was drafted by a committee in Philadelphia, it was then sent to the states to ratify individually. And while the Constitution only required nine of the thirteen states to be put into effect, only those states that had ratified it would be part of the Union. Those who had not ratified could not take part in the new government. This is a continuation of the political practice started with the Articles of Confederation in which the Second Continental Congress drafted and approved the Articles but then sent them to each state for independent ratification. The same is true of the Declaration of Independence—no state was forced against its will to fight the British once a majority of states accepted the Declaration; rather, it required unanimous consent from each state in Congress,” Dr. Kyle Scott in today’s essay.

Maryland’s 1867 State Constitution, Among the Oldest in Use Today

It is August 27, 1776; the British have mounted their anticipated invasion of Long Island, New York. British General William Howe commits 20,000 of his best troops to the fight, including 8,000 Hessians, against approximately 6,000 ill-equipped and ill-experienced Americans (20,000 to 6,000; hardly seems a fair fight). Howe splits his forces across three fronts and executes a daring nighttime flanking maneuver that utterly surprises the American forces. The Americans are soon routed from their defensive lines and forced to retreat onto fortified Brooklyn Heights. To buy time for the withdrawal, Washington orders General William Stirling, commanding two units of the 1st Delaware Regiment as well as four companies from the 1st Maryland Regiment, to hold his line on the Gowanus Road. The 1st Maryland Regiment (part of the “Maryland Line”) is under the temporary command of Major Mordecai Gist (the unit’s commander, Colonel William Smallwood, is attending court martial duty in the city). The British attack up the Gowanus Road consists of 2,000 troops under the command of General James Grant. The Marylanders, soon reduced to less than 400 men (The Immortal 400)[1] are ordered to hold the line near Vechte-Cortelyou house, a stone building commanding the strategic road and a bridge, the only escape route across the Gowanus Salt Marsh. Not only do Gist’s men hold off the British, they make six amazing counterattacks before being finally forced to scatter and make their own escape back to American lines. Only a handful of the Maryland men are successful. Watching from Brooklyn Heights, General Washington turns to General Israel Putnam and states:

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780: John Adams & the Fundamental Liberties of the People, Tony Williams

The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780: John Adams & the Fundamental Liberties of the People

In the fall of 1779, John Adams was home in Massachusetts during a respite from his diplomatic responsibilities in Europe. While he was there, Adams drafted the state constitution that built on the constitutions and experiences of other states, using them as a model of success and failure. The resulting Massachusetts Constitution was a balanced constitution.

Royal authority had collapsed in Massachusetts in 1775, and the state was governed by a provincial congress under the 1691 colonial charter. The legislature had drafted a constitution in 1778, but the sovereign people of local townships had rejected it.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Martha Zoller 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Georgia on My Mind, Martha Zoller

Georgia on My Mind

When James Oglethorpe claimed Georgia (named for King George III) in 1732, he then brought settlers to Savannah in 1733, who would have thought that less than 50 years later, there would be a war for independence from England. This was one of the challenges for Georgians. Many were not that far removed from life in England and many were not sure about this new initiative called the United States of America.

That didn’t stop Lyman Hall, Button Gwinnett and George Walton from signing the Declaration of Independence in 1776. These three men would find their names on three of the 159 counties in Georgia in the fastest growing part of Georgia some 240 years later.

New Jersey: Third of the Original Thirteen to Join the United States

Like Delaware, had New Jersey for some reason not ratified the Constitution, there would still have been a United States. Little did the four signers of the Constitution from New Jersey in 1787 foresee that their relatively small state would be the 11th most populous in present times. New Jersey’s delegates were instrumental in protecting the smaller states and although the Virginia Plan ultimately was the winner in the final Constitution, the New Jersey Plan protections were incorporated. The Garden State, along with Delaware and Georgia, were the only three of the thirteen colonies to vote unanimously at their state conventions for ratification of this new union, the United States of America.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Hohns, Ph.D, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Hohns, Ph.D., Pennsylvania and Our Form of Government

Pennsylvania and Our Form of Government

We have in Pennsylvania a form of government founded on principles of individual liberty and self-determination. William Penn’s “Holy Experiment,” as Pennsylvania was called, provided its inhabitants certain inviolable rights through our Charter of Privileges–freedom of religion, liberty of consciousness, the election of our legislative representatives, and protections from abusive government intrusion. Of Pennsylvania, William Penn wrote that it would one day be the “seed of a nation.”

Delaware: Admitted as “The First State” December 7, 1787

As the Constitutional Convention came to a close in Philadelphia, America’s founding representatives signed the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787. Then, the first of the thirteen original states to ratify and approve this document, this new U.S. Constitution, which replaced the Articles of Confederation, was Delaware, signing on December 7, 1787. This signing admitted Delaware, known as “The First State,” to the United States on December 7, 1787, subject to at least nine other colonies joining in agreeing to the U.S. Constitution. The current Delaware State Constitution in use, which is the fourth constitution in Delaware, was adopted in 1897, but its first was adopted on September 20, 1776. The first constitution referred to the state as “The Delaware State.”

State Constitutions? Why Would Each State Need Its Own Constitution? Part 2

State Constitutions? – Why would each state need a constitution when we have the United States Constitution? What would it mean for the states to be run by their citizens rather than royal rule?

In many cases, these first state constitutions take the opportunity to explain principles of government which the Framers of 1787 apparently thought were so “self-evident” as to not require mentioning. For example, the Virginia Declaration makes the following statements (here paraphrased) not found in the U.S. Constitution:

• That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have inherent rights that they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity.
• That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.
• That magistrates should be at all times amenable to the people.
• That elected officials should be returned to the body of the people to feel, once again, their burdens.
• That government is instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community.
• That a majority of the community has a right to reform, alter or abolish their government.
• That no individual or group is entitled to exclusive or separate benefits or privileges from the community.
• That citizens should evidence a permanent common interest in, and attachment to, their community before being allowed to vote.[1]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Marc Clauson, State Constitutions? Why Would Each State Need Its Own Constitution? Part 1 – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

State Constitutions? Why Would Each State Need Its Own Constitution? Part 1 – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

As a result, governance from England was exercised through the king and his colonial governors. If the states were governed by their citizens they would be able to choose their own type of institutional structure and likely (as they did) directly participate in choosing many of the public officials. The government would in a real sense be closer to the people. Local conditions would be better known, as opposed to attempts to make policy from the mother country.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Archie P. Jones, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Archie P. Jones, Our First States’ Constitutions, Declarations of Rights and Bills of Rights vs. “The Liberal History Lesson” – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

Our First States’ Constitutions, Declarations of Rights and Bills of Rights vs. “The Liberal History Lesson” – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

Concerning civil government, they set forth a covenantal, republican view that civil government must, under God, be based upon the consent of the governed. Concerning man, the rulers and the ruled, they affirmed that he is created with certain unalienable God-given rights, but rejected notions that man is either “neutral” or naturally good. They affirmed the unpleasant reality of Original Sin and designed their governments to protect liberty and justice against it. Because they knew the fallen nature of man, they designed limited republics with written constitutions and bills of rights. Those republics had both democratic and aristocratic features, designed to protect the majority and the minority against injustices. They were not egalitarian, and sought to protect property by means of graded property qualifications for government offices. To protect and promote godly laws and liberty, they had Christian qualifications for public office; in respect for Christians who believe that God forbids men to swear an “oath,” they let them make an “affirmation” instead. To promote the benefits of education in all mental, practical, and geographical areas of a state, they encouraged the towns, precincts, and voluntary associations to promote Christian instruction.

Because they knew the fallen nature of man, they created systems of separation of powers with accompanying checks and balances among institutions to protect liberty and justice. For the same reason, they stated the right of the people to resist tyranny.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Archie P. Jones, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Archie P. Jones, The Peoples of Our Early States: Not “One People” – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

The Peoples of Our Early States: Not “One People” – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

When John Jay, in Federalist No. 2, said he had often noted with pleasure that “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people—a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence,” he was half right. He recognized that the peoples of the states that declared their independence in 1776 were overwhelmingly Christians and Protestants. Yet he was certainly wrong about them being “one united people,” and about them having a purpose to establish “general liberty and independence,” for as the colonies’ Declaration makes clear, they fought to make each colony, under God, a free and independent state.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Marc Clauson, Religious Freedom Since the First Amendment and Early State Constitutions – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

Religious Freedom Since the First Amendment and Early State Constitutions – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

Throughout the “establishment period” (until 1833) the states allowed dissenting churches even though they mandated official churches supported by tax money. It was not until 1947 in the Everson v. Board of Education, that the Supreme Court began to apply the Establishment Clause to the states. At that point any established churches would be unconstitutional in the states. Nevertheless, freedom of religion—toleration in effect—was already the custom of the states, and all had by then abolished established churches.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Archie P. Jones, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Archie P. Jones, Remaining Early States’ History of Religious Freedom and Disestablishment: South Carolina, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Georgia, Rhode Island – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

Remaining Early States’ History of Religious Freedom and Disestablishment: South Carolina, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Georgia, Rhode Island – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

The new constitution of 1778 omitted a provision for paying ministers from parish funds: making support of “religion” voluntary and equal before the law. To promote religious liberty, the constitution extended corporate status to all Protestant religious societies that would affirm the fundamental Christian doctrines stated in the South Carolina Constitution.

No legislature has a right to interfere with the judgment and conscience of men, in religious matters, if their opinions and practices do not injure the state….The State may give countenance to religion, by defending and protecting all denominations of Christians, who are inoffensive and useful. The State may enact good laws for the punishment of vice, and the encouragement of virtue. The State may do anything for the support of religion, without partiality to particular societies, or imposition upon the rights of private judgment.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Archie P. Jones, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Archie P. Jones, Religious Freedom and Disestablishment in North Carolina, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

Religious Freedom and Disestablishment in North Carolina, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

“Disestablishment” and “religious freedom” in North Carolina, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire were motivated by different intentions than we have long been taught.

North Carolina had an Anglican establishment before independence and a non-Anglican majority that disliked the Anglican Church. Dissenters were excluded from all offices of power and dignity and had to pay tithes to the Anglican Church. Independence and the new constitution of 1776 changed this by precluding the existence of any established church and establishing a Protestant civil government. Article XXXII declared:

That no person, who shall deny the being of God or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority either of the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall be capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in the civil department within this State.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Archie P. Jones, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Archie P. Jones, Disestablishment, Christianity, and Religious Liberty in Virginia – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

Disestablishment, Christianity, and Religious Liberty in Virginia – Guest Essayist: Archie P. Jones

“Disestablishment” in Virginia was only removal of all legal preference for the Episcopal Church. It was not fully achieved until 1840—54 years after Jefferson’s bill. It was accomplished—overwhelmingly—by the efforts of Christians, particularly of the former “dissenting sects.” It obviously was not intended to create, and did not produce “neutrality” among all religions, secularism, or de-Christianization. It therefore is not, and cannot be either a precedent or evidence for “neutrality” among all religions, secularism, or de-Christianization of American law.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Fundamental Law and Natural Rights: The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, Tony Williams

Fundamental Law and Natural Rights: The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom

Jefferson and the legislature then made the law and the principle of religious liberty a fundamental right that could never be revoked by a future legislature, binding future generations to the rights of man. “If any act shall be hereafter passed to repeal the present or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right.”

Most states pursued religious liberty as a fundamental right and disestablished their churches, though not all did, because of principle of federalism in the U.S. Constitution. In the 1830s, Massachusetts became the last state to disestablish. But, the American Revolution and founding advanced both civil and religious liberty for the American people.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Religious Freedom and Role of the States in Their Own Early Constitutions, Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Religious Freedom and Role of the States in Their Own Early Constitutions, Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Let the unabashedly left-wing Justice William Douglas have the last word. He wrote in 1952 in Zorach v. Clausen, “The First Amendment, however, does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of Church and State…. Otherwise the state and religion would be aliens to each other—hostile, suspicious, and even unfriendly…. We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being…. When the State encourages religious instruction…, it follows the best of our traditions. For it then respects the religious nature of our people and accommodates the public service to their needs. To hold that it may not would be to find in the Constitution a requirement that the government show a callous indifference to religious groups. That would be preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Religious Freedom and Role of the States in Their Own Early Constitutions, Part 1 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Religious Freedom and Role of the States in Their Own Early Constitutions, Part 1 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

As the Pilgrims’ “Mayflower Compact” of November 11, 1620, stated, “Having undertaken for the glory of God, and advancement of the christian [sic] faith, and the honour of our King and country, voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia; [we] …combine ourselves…into a civil body politick, for furtherance of the ends aforesaid ….” Puritan colonies in New England similarly strived for their goal to “lead the New Testament life, yet make a living,” as the historian Samuel Eliot Morison summarized it. The “Fundamental Orders” of the Connecticut River towns in 1639, a basic written constitution, set as their purpose to “enter into…confederation together, to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess, as also the discipline of the Churches, which according to the truth of the said gospel is now practiced among us ….”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Jennie Jones 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Free and Independent: The States’ Declaration and the Articles of Confederation – Guest Essayist: Jennie Jones, Jennie Jones

Free and Independent: The States’ Declaration and the Articles of Confederation – Guest Essayist: Jennie Jones

In thinking about what the Declaration of Independence meant for state powers, perhaps the better question is what powers didn’t the states have upon their independence? Consider the very first line and note what is emphasized: “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America.” This is telling. Why use “unanimous” if all the states were considered one entity?

When government under the Articles proved defective, many in the states sought to create a stronger central government; many others feared that the new central government would be too strong. The new governmental system that the colonies established under the Constitution was meant to retain the great majority of governmental power in the respective states, not to centralize power in the new, limited national government, nor to enable future officials in that government to centralize power. Those who advocated ratifying the finished Constitution insisted that the new central government did not and would not be a threat to the powers of the states.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Free, Independent, and Sovereign? – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Free, Independent, and Sovereign? – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey

In declaring their independence from the British Empire, “the Representatives of the united States of America” acted “in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies.” The “United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent States.” Plural, not singular. But also united: as one of Mr. Shakespeare’s characters says, there’s the rub. The American States are free and independent respecting Great Britain. But are they free and independent respecting one another? And if so, to what extent? “As Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do,” but may they do these things severally, without regard to each other, or only as a united body? What is the character of the American Union?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Craig Bruce Smith 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, American Revolution and Expanding the States – Guest Essayist: Craig Bruce Smith, Craig Bruce Smith

American Revolution and Expanding the States – Guest Essayist: Craig Bruce Smith

In 1763, with “the scratch of a pen,” North America had changed forever. After years of looming as an ever-present danger, the French threat had finally been removed from Canada and the lands east of the Mississippi. The territory had been hard won as a result of the 1763 Treaty of Paris that formally ended the French and Indian War waged on the British colonies’ western frontier since 1754. “That Enemy who hath so long stuck like a Thorn in the Sides of our Colonies is removed,” wrote Massachusetts governor Francis Bernard; now “North-America” was “[e]ntirely British.” Native American unrest followed. That same year, the newly crowned King George III, fearful of further rebellion and citing it as “essential to our Interest,” stopped western expansion with a theoretical line on a map that ran through the Appalachian Mountains (which run from modern day Canada to Alabama). The Proclamation of 1763, as it was known, barred Americans from collecting their promised spoils of war, and unknowingly became one of the American Revolution’s earliest causes.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Relation of the Federal Government to the State Governments: What Does Publius Say? – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Relation of the Federal Government to the State Governments: What Does Publius Say? – Guest Essayist: Will Morrisey

Madison assures his readers that the form of the “general” or federal government remains “strictly republican.” “No other form would be reconcilable with the genius of the people of America; with the fundamental principles of the Revolution; or with that honorable determination which animates every votary of freedom to rest all our political experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government.” Such a government will derive “all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people” and not “from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it.” Self-governing citizens must never be reduced to spectators, gazing at the actions of ‘statesmen’ far above and beyond their control.

In all this, as Madison writes in the forty-ninth Federalist, the Framers have structured the new federal government and the American system of governments overall in such a way as to secure natural rights while minimizing the infirmities and depravities of the human nature all persons share. Not the passions but the reason of the American public should “sit in judgment” of the government: “It is the reason, alone, of the public, that ought to control and regulate the government. The passions ought to be controlled and regulated by the government.” “As there is a degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and distrust, so there are other qualities in human nature which justify a certain portion of esteem and confidence. Republican government presupposes the existence of these qualities in a higher degree than any other form,” and so does federalism, rightly understood. If such were not the case, “the inference would be that there is not sufficient virtue among men for self-government; and that nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: A Firm and Clear Boundary Between the States and the Congress – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: A Firm and Clear Boundary Between the States and the Congress – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

The structure of checks and balances among the branches of government and the split sovereignty of the Constitution’s version of federalism were, as Madison and other supporters had insisted, the bulwark to constrain the general government and to protect the people’s rights against arbitrary power.

From a constitutional perspective, the Tenth Amendment is a shadow of what it represented at the time of the ratification debates. If Congress acts directly on individuals under the broad reach of the commerce power, the Tenth Amendment is no real barrier. Only if Congress, instead of legislating directly, seeks to “commandeer” the states into adopting federal policies or administering federal laws is there a violation of the states’ residual sovereignty.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Andrew Langer, Blog 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Federalism and the Tenth Amendment: The Buttress of Our Republic – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Federalism and the Tenth Amendment: The Buttress of Our Republic – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

There is a beauty in our structure of governance—a structure as carefully engineered as a Greek temple or medieval cathedral, and likewise meant to stand for centuries. In our federalist system, the branches and levels of our government are separate yet intertwined, both opposing and relying on one another to create a system that is both strong and delicate.

But like those engineered structures of old, whose beauty and durability can be compromised by misunderstanding and neglect, the same holds true for the support beams undergirding our republic. A failure to appreciate their role, a misguided effort to subvert their role, and the whole structure, the whole republic collapses. Most importantly, undo the various institutions of federalism (either through affirmative effort or neglect), and the republic decays and ultimately dies.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Garry, Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Purpose for Limited Federal Powers, Meaning for State and Local Government – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry

Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Purpose for Limited Federal Powers, Meaning for State and Local Government – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry

In the constitutional scheme, federalism provides an avenue for local self-determination, in addition to a vertical check on government oppression, with the states serving as a localized control on the centralized national government.

Under the framers’ view of federalism, as expressed in the Tenth Amendment, the national government would exert supreme authority only within the limited scope of its enumerated powers; the states meanwhile would exercise the remainder of sovereign authority, subject to the restraint of interstate competition from other states.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2019, Blog, Karla Jones, Lisa B. Nelson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2019 - State and Local Government, 9. State and Local Government, 90 Day Studies, Introduction: Federalism – New Horizons For A Time-Honored Governing Principle – Guest Essayists: Lisa B. Nelson And Karla Jones, Karla Jones, Lisa B. Nelson

Introduction: Federalism – New Horizons For A Time-Honored Governing Principle – Guest Essayists: Lisa B. Nelson And Karla Jones

With the goal of preserving freedom by preventing the consolidation of control in any one political structure, the Founders came together to draft the U.S. Constitution. Mindful and somewhat humbled by the failure of the Articles of Confederation, they understood that a central authority was necessary to provide for the common defense and general welfare – and most important of all – to protect the liberty for which they had fought so hard. However, they also recognized that giving the federal government unchecked power would likely lead to a tyranny not so very different than the one they had just overthrown.

As Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist no. 17, “It is a known fact in human nature that its affections are commonly weak in proportion to the distance or diffusiveness of the object. Upon the same principle that a man is more attached to his family than to his neighborhood, to his neighborhood than to the community at large, the people of each State are apt to feel a stronger bias towards their local governments than towards the government of the Union.”

Their solution was an ingenious design that gave the federal government the authority that it needed to unite the nation while devising a system of internal and external checks to diffuse power so that the national government would ultimately be subject to the will of the states and the people.

Blog 9. State and Local Government

Essay Schedule 90-Day Study 2019

Constituting America’s Ninth 90-Day Study on State and Local Government Preface: The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” The amendment’s purpose is intended to strengthen […]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Conclusion: The Old Senate – Guest Essayist: William Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

Conclusion: The Old Senate

If the writers contributing to this year’s 90-Day Study have identified a main theme for their essays, it is the difference between the way Congressional representatives understood their Constitutional duties in the first century-and-a-quarter of our Union and the ways Congressmen have come to act since Progressivism came to dominate American opinion.

From a lawmaking institution whose members consulted the Constitution and, behind it, the natural rights enunciated in the Declaration of Independence, Congress has become a constituent-service institution which attempts to oversee and negotiate with the bureaucratic apparatus of a massive national state. To be sure, it still debates and enacts laws, but very often leaves the details of those laws to the administrative agencies which enforce them, agencies which collectively amount to a fourth branch of government, and an unelected one at that. Given the re-conception of the Constitution as a ‘living’ or ‘elastic’ document, those laws may have only a remote connection to the plain meaning of the (formerly) supreme law of the land.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Press: How Media Coverage Affects The Legislative Process – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Press: How Media Coverage Affects The Legislative Process

Fake news? Real news? Newswriting has no end. What matters most among abundant sources of information, however, is an ability to maintain freedom of speech including that of the press. Certainly, without integrity in journalism news is not news and only amounts to opinion. Yet, above that, the United States Constitution includes the law that Congress is not allowed to abridge (prevent, suppress, gag) the press. To do so invites tyranny.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Scot Faulkner, Technology: Impact On & By Congress From Ink & Quill To Electronic Voting, Internet & Televised Floor Proceedings – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner

Technology: Impact On & By Congress From Ink & Quill To Electronic Voting, Internet & Televised Floor Proceedings

This changed in January 1995, when the Library of Congress made digital copies of the Congressional Record available on its website. Continuous improvements now allow for user friendly search of the Record and all legislation, by anyone on the web, anytime, anywhere.

They designed and implemented the most dramatic technology revolution in Congressional history. This giant leap took House communications from the 18th Century into the 21st in one giant leap.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Lobbying: Influence Of Lobbyists On Congress – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Lobbying: Influence Of Lobbyists On Congress

Some get caught up in illegal activity. Others are honest in their attempts to represent client concerns. Who are they? Lobbyists. Political lobbying has existed as long as voters and elected leaders have.

To “lobby” has been termed from various sources as one who comes to visit, to connect with others. Politically, to lobby is to seek the ear of an elected official to influence votes on legislation. This description makes any constituent who writes, visits, or calls his or her congressman, a “lobbyist.” What is it, then, that makes people cringe at the word, lobbyist?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joseph Postell, Ph.D., Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joseph Postell PhD, Role Of Congress As Representative Government & The Rise Of The Progressive Administrative State – Guest Essayists: Joseph Postell & Samuel Postell, Sam Postell

Role Of Congress As Representative Government & The Rise Of The Progressive Administrative State

This is surely one reason why, throughout the twentieth century, the nation witnessed a steady increase in reelection rates to Congress, the rise of career members of Congress, and a decrease in voters’ sense that the government reflects their wishes.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Direction Of Power, Congress, And The Rise Of the Progressive Administrative State – Guest Essayist: Patrick M. Garry, Patrick Garry

Direction Of Power, Congress, And The Rise Of the Progressive Administrative State

The progressive administrative state has its historical roots in the New Deal agenda of the 1930s. Progressives believed that only an unrestrained federal executive branch could remedy all the effects of the Great Depression, as well as engineer society so that such a calamity would never again occur. The progressive mindset saw limited government, the private-sector economy, and the complex web of social and cultural institutions that characterized America since its colonial beginnings as means of oppression. To progressives, individual liberty gave way to the power of big government to engineer society for individuals who do not have the expertise to adequately govern themselves.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Congress And The Rise Of The Progressive Administrative State – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson, Marc Clauson

Congress And The Rise Of The Progressive Administrative State

Progressivism is…“a total rejection in theory, and a partial rejection in practice, of the principles and policies on which America had been founded and on the basis of which the Civil War had been fought and won only a few years earlier.”

The best means or state action was the most efficient and the most efficient was a bureaucratic and centralized government that could then bypass the inefficiencies of the separation of powers and a deliberative Congress.

So while one may place some blame on the Court, an equal blame falls on Congress itself. It has delegated power to non-elected and unaccountable agencies while at the same time passing incredibly lengthy and complex legislation, thus justifying (it argues) such delegation.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, How The Democratic & Republican Parties Have Changed Throughout United States History & The Effects On Congress – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, Tony Williams

How The Democratic & Republican Parties Have Changed Throughout United States History & The Effects On Congress

Americans are deeply polarized in this country but often incorrectly attribute it to growing partisanship and the strength of political parties. In fact, the opposite is true. Some scholars have argued that the growing polarization in Congress and in politics more generally is a symptom of a declining two-party system and identification of Americans with one of the two major parties.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, The Honorable Frank M. Reilly 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Filibuster: History, Purpose As Used By The Senate & Effects On The Legislative Process – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Frank M. Reilly, Frank M. Reilly, The Honorable Frank Reilly

Filibuster: History, Purpose As Used By The Senate & Effects On The Legislative Process

The word “filibuster” is a variation of the Spanish word for pirate, which is indicative of the parliamentary move that stops a vote from occurring. But even though the rule change occurred in 1806, no senator threatened a filibuster until 1837, and it not used until 1841.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joseph Postell, Ph.D., Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joseph Postell PhD, Revolt Of 1910 Against House Speaker Joseph Cannon (1836-1926) (R-IL) – Guest Essayists: Joseph Postell and Samuel Postell, Sam Postell

Revolt Of 1910 Against House Speaker Joseph Cannon (1836-1926) (R-IL)

Every fourth of July American citizens recognize the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the revolution that gave birth to our country, but very few remember the revolution that occurred in Congress about one hundred years after the revolutionary war. That revolution has had profound effects on how Congress works today.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, George Landrith 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, George Landrith, Partisanship & Violence In Congress: The Caning Of Senator & Abolitionist, Charles Sumner (1811-1874) (R-MA) – Guest Essayist: George Landrith

Partisanship & Violence In Congress: The Caning Of Senator & Abolitionist, Charles Sumner (1811-1874) (R-MA)

Obviously, civility should be our standard. We can engage in robust debate. But threats and violence have no place in a constitutional republic.
A more subtle version of hyper partisanship is now in vogue. Calling upon supporters to “confront” political opponents wherever they may be, is clearly an attempt to put them in fear for their safety — without actually crossing the red line of doing them physical harm. But it is nonetheless an attempt to threaten the opposition and bully them into submission. This cannot be tolerated in a free society.

The truth is politics is a surrogate for violence and war. In a less civilized society, those who can enforce their will upon the rest of the populace become the rulers. In establishing a constitutional republic, the Founders were attempting to set aside that age old “rule by force” model of government. Instead, they created a system where the voice of the people ruled — without enforcing their will through threats and violence.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Richard Wagner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Gridlock: Why Congress Is So Contentious & The Effects On Passage Of Good Laws – Guest Essayist: Richard E. Wagner, Richard E. Wagner

Gridlock: Why Congress Is So Contentious & The Effects On Passage Of Good Laws

To be sure, we should always expect some gridlock inside political processes, as was recognized at the time of the American Constitutional founding. Our present political system, however, seems to have created a significant cleavage between those who would like to be left alone by the federal government to pursue their peaceful dreams and projects and those who seek to receive support at someone else’s expense.

Yet we must recognize that governments can’t create wealth. All they can do is take and redistribute wealth that other people have created. This property of government was recognized at the time of our Constitutional founding, and we need to recapture that founding wisdom. This does not entail streamlining government to reduce gridlock, but rather requires restoring our Constitutional system of free enterprise and limited government.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Genius Design: How An American Bill Becomes Law – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Genius Design: How An American Bill Becomes Law

Upwards of 5,000 bills get filed in a legislative session of Congress, and around 500 may pass. And for good reason. The process weeds out. Unfortunately, though, bills do languish in committee without further consideration that are actually better ideas for the country than others that make it through the process.

This is why lawmakers, which is what Members of Congress are, need to understand the United States Constitution to consider whether bills they are filing are constitutional before filing. It is important that they learn America’s history and founding, and how America’s founding documents such as the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights, make America succeed as exceptional. It is important that lawmakers understand that America’s Constitution is the law of the land, and that the Preamble to the Constitution is only an introduction, not a precedent of law in which they may cite a constitutional purpose for filing a certain bill. Learning America’s history and founding matters so that lawmakers understand checks and balances, the balance of power that prevents the resting of too much power in one part of government. America’s elected leaders too often forget this. It is our duty, as “We The People,” to be educated ourselves, and remind them.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter, Sign Or Not Sign Into Law – Getting A Bill From Congress To The President’s Desk: How Easy Should It Be? – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

Sign Or Not Sign Into Law – Getting A Bill From Congress To The President’s Desk: How Easy Should It Be?

In 1776, Thomas Jefferson complained in his famous declaration that King George III had “refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.” Laws duly passed by the colonial legislatures and sent to the King often never received his signature and thus were never put into effect. Some of these bills were no doubt “wholesome and necessary.” The Framers of 1787 sought to solve this problem. They set out to ensure the “people’s voice,” as reflected in the actions of their representatives, would never be muted.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Will They Agree? When Legislation Must Go To A Conference Committee After The House And Senate – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Will They Agree? When Legislation Must Go To A Conference Committee After The House And Senate

The slow and often tiresome processes of Congress come from a long history that America’s Founders seriously considered when designing a new system of government for the new country, and its Constitution as they realized firsthand how difficult it was to escape unchecked power. A weary, exasperated John Adams wrote in a letter to his wife Abigail in 1777 during the American Revolutionary War that highlights the importance of weighing decisions with careful deliberation, resolve and eyes on the future:

“Posterity! You will never know, how much it cost the present Generation, to preserve your Freedom! I hope you will make a good Use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven, that I ever took half the Pains to preserve it.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, From Committee To Floor Vote: Role Of The American People In The Congressional Committee Process – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

From Committee To Floor Vote: Role Of The American People In The Congressional Committee Process

The committee process in Congress can play a significant role in revealing true intentions of legislation so that voters, including United States House of Representatives and Senate Members, know just what each bill is about exactly, and receive opportunities especially to work out any unintended consequences before a bill gets to the House or Senate Floor for a vote.

Various committees exist in both the House and Senate on issues from Agriculture, to Homeland Security, to Small Business to Ways and Means, and more. Some committees are standing or permanent, and others are temporary such as conferences committees designed to work out differences between bill versions in the House and Senate. All can make a difference in maintaining accountability, efficiency, transparency, and integrity in America’s representative government.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Constitutional Muster – How Representative Government Happens During Congressional Committee Hearings – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Constitutional Muster – How Representative Government Happens During Congressional Committee Hearings

Congressional hearings, the embodiment of representative government, are deteriorating. This undermines the carefully crafted balancing of powers in the U.S. Constitution.

Representative government means its elected officials must do their duty. Even “boring” management oversight is important, especially to taxpayers concerned about how their hard-earned money is spent.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joseph Postell, Ph.D., Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Committees – History & Purpose In The United States Congress – Guest Essayists: Joseph Postell & Samuel Postell, Joseph Postell PhD, Sam Postell

Committees – History & Purpose In The United States Congress

Committees provide Congress with a double-edged sword. They help Congress do its job, but they also threaten to subvert the legislative process, dividing Congress into many subunits, each of which advance a narrow, special interest rather than the common good. If they are not held accountable to the whole Congress, through rules that allow party leaders to influence committees and allow members to amend legislation after it leaves committees, they can threaten the very purpose of Congress: to make laws that reflect the sense of the majority rather than the interests of the powerful.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Introducing Legislation – How Does Congress Get Ideas For Bills? – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Introducing Legislation – How Does Congress Get Ideas For Bills?

Intriguing is the story of America’s history and ideas at the core of its start. Involved in an interesting mix of proposals on how to meet needs for order, balance of power, and representative government, it began by making sure America on every level would be equipped to develop as free people and remain so, and run without getting in its own way.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, LaVaughn G. Lewis, W. David Stedman 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Ideas Of Liberty For A Free People – Guest Essayists: W. David Stedman And LaVaughn G. Lewis, LaVaughn G. Lewis, W. David Stedman

Ideas Of Liberty For A Free People

“…one must understand something of the spirit of the people who had been experimenting successfully with liberty for over 165 years when the Constitution was framed.”

It is clear that Americans were educated in the ideas of liberty for several generations. As late as 1830, Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville observed among the general population of America the same high degree of education and understanding of basic principles. “It cannot be doubted that in the United States the instruction of the people powerfully contributes to the support of the democratic republic….” Even in outlying areas, he said, the American “will inform you what his rights are and by what means he exercises them….”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Germane – What Should And Should Not Be Placed In A Bill To Keep Legislation Easy To Understand And Appropriate – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, James D. Best

Germane – What Should And Should Not Be Placed In A Bill To Keep Legislation Easy To Understand And Appropriate

How do we force easy-to-understand laws that lawmakers and law-abiding citizens can comprehend? By insisting Congress pass smaller, single issue bills. In the real world, point solutions are popular because they are doable … and results can be measured. If something needs fixing, focus legislation on the broken part, and leave the rest alone until the new law’s effectiveness can be assessed. If there are multiple broken parts, Congress should avoid a comprehensive redesign that allows everyone to get their fingers into the cookie jar.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Length Of Legislation: Why Bills Have Grown Significantly Longer Over The History Of The United States Congress – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson, Marc Clauson

Length Of Legislation: Why Bills Have Grown Significantly Longer Over The History Of The United States Congress

Why is Congressional legislation since the 1980s so lengthy and complex? Can this and should it be addressed as a problem or is it simply the product of our modern economic and political world? Those are the questions to be addressed in this essay. They are not however idle questions. It does make a difference when modern legislation is so long and sometimes extremely complex and vague, to the citizen who wishes to comply with it but cannot understand it, or to the courts who must interpret it. Not only that, but when legislation becomes so intricate, this gives the administrative agencies charged with implementing it through regulations and adjudication much more discretion and power than a constitutional system would envision.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, History And Purpose Of Rules In The United States House Of Representatives And Senate – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

History And Purpose Of Rules In The United States House Of Representatives And Senate

“be in all cases the most rational or not, is really not of so great importance. It is much more material that there should be a rule to go by than what that rule is; that there may be a uniformity of proceeding in business, not subject to the caprice of the Speaker or captiousness of the members. It is very material that order, decency, and regularity be preserved in a dignified public body.” –Thomas Jefferson, Manual of Parliamentary Practice

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Congressional Aides: How Staff Assist Congress Members & Help Them Understand Bills – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Congressional Aides: How Staff Assist Congress Members & Help Them Understand Bills

By the end of the 19th Century Congress had only 146 staff members: 37 Senate personal staff, 39 Senate committee staff, and 62 House committee staff (37 of whom only worked during congressional sessions). In 1893, the House approved the first personal staff for its Members.

The Populist and Progressive movements ignited government regulation of America’s burgeoning economy. New federal agencies meant dramatic increases in spending and the need for vigorous Congressional oversight of Executive Branch activities.

Except for limiting government during the Administration of President Calvin Coolidge, the role, scope, and size of the federal activities grew rapidly and never stopped. Congress introduced, considered, and passed more and more laws facilitating this expansion. By the early 1970s over 26,000 legislative bills and resolutions were being introduced during each two-year Congress.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Roles: House Speaker, President Of The Senate, Majority, Minority Leaders And Whips For An Effective Congress, Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Roles: House Speaker, President Of The Senate, Majority, Minority Leaders And Whips For An Effective Congress, Part 2

The various roles established throughout the course of American history are proving effective though some want to rid America’s Congress of its Members almost immediately after an election. However, made up of imperfect people who would fail at times yet try again, America’s Founders and Constitution Framers showed up for known, imminent challenges, and against just about impossible odds to succeed. They did so believing something better could exist and pursued a new type of governing that if maintained by the electorate would offer the most freedom for those it represented.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Amanda Hughes, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Amanda Hughes, Roles: House Speaker, President Of The Senate, Majority, Minority Leaders And Whips For An Effective Congress – Guest Essayist: Amanda Hughes

Roles: House Speaker, President Of The Senate, Majority, Minority Leaders And Whips For An Effective Congress

Leadership roles in the United States House of Representatives and Senate help advance the purpose of Congress and why each member was elected – to serve. Various positions bring in members who offer each Congress that convenes unique experience and abilities.

Development of leadership roles that would carry into the new, settled governing system was in the making in the years surrounding the first, second, and third Continental Congresses and into the first United States Congress.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Andrew Langer, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Separation Of Powers, Checks & Balances And Impeachment: Presidents Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Separation Of Powers, Checks & Balances And Impeachment: Presidents Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton

Our founders had great faith in the rationality of American leaders—but they also recognized that men were fallible. As James Madison wrote in Federalist #51:
“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Tony Williams, Treaty-Making Power Of Congress – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams

Treaty-Making Power Of Congress

In the early republic, the founding generation took the treaty-making provisions of the Constitution seriously even as they sought to define the parameters of those constitutional powers. As the first president, George Washington, in particular, tried to set the right constitutional precedents and observe the proper balance of powers with relation to the legislative branch. Although the battles over the treaty-making authority could be highly contentious, the fights took place within a constitutional framework and helped establish the principles of American foreign policy.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Andrew Langer, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Congress, Declarations Of War And Authorization Of Force, And War Powers Act – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Congress, Declarations Of War And Authorization Of Force, And War Powers Act

“[T]he Constitution protects us from our own best intentions: It divides power among sovereigns and among branches of government precisely so that we may resist the temptation to concentrate power in one location as an expedient solution to the crisis of the day.”

And the founders were incredibly suspicious of the power to wage war being abused by a centralized government. They had seen firsthand the arbitrary and cavalier ways in which monarchs, and not just the British monarchy, were using war, and had used war throughout the world’s history, as a way of building empire, and glory, and power.

This is NOT what they wanted these United States to be—and so they made it difficult for the nation to wage war.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Congressional Powers And War: United States Congress Versus The Confederate Congress During The Civil War – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, James D. Best

Congressional Powers And War: United States Congress Versus The Confederate Congress During The Civil War

The Framers interminably debated every little detail of the Constitution. Did they end up getting it right? The Civil War indicates they may have.

Power Of The Purse And The Congressional Budget Process

One of the most important tasks Congress must complete is to set a budget. It is especially important for members of Congress to understand how the budget works in order to best represent and serve the American people. For this reason, our United States Constitution framers recognized the need for a system that could remain within the knowledge and control of the people who would entrust power to their elected representatives concerning the nation’s finances.

The framers did not want to repeat what they observed in England where the king was able to direct funds rather than the citizenry directing funds. The framers instead put together a different form of government that left control or “power of the purse” in the hands of the people. This is how Congress, the legislative branch, was placed in charge of taxing and spending, a system by which voters could have a say in the direction of funds and hold their representatives accountable.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Richard Wagner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Congressional Oversight Of Federal Bureaucracy – Guest Essayist: Richard Wagner, Richard E. Wagner

Congressional Oversight Of Federal Bureaucracy

It is commonplace to assert that Congress exercises oversight over federal bureaus and executive agencies. But is this a reasonable assertion? Or might it represent a romantic yearning for an earlier and simpler age, or even for an age that never existed?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Andrew Langer, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Andrew Langer, Federalism, The Senate, And The Constitution – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Federalism, The Senate, And The Constitution

..the Constitution was created as a document that turned the nature of government on its head. Power, narrowly and carefully ceded, flowed from the people to their government.

The founders were explicit about this because they knew that over time, people would come to forget the tyrannies Americans had faced at the beginning of our nation’s history (and before).

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Federalism: Legislative Power Of Congress And The State And Local Levels – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, Patrick Garry

Federalism: Legislative Power Of Congress And The State And Local Levels

Defined as a system of dual sovereignty, federalism envisions a constitutional order in which national and state governments each possess their own sphere of autonomy and authority.

Whereas the concept of separation of powers operates on a horizontal level, ensuring the autonomy of the different branches (legislative, executive and judicial) within any one level of government (state or national), federalism operates vertically, ensuring the autonomy of those different levels. Both federalism and separation of powers act as a coordinated system of checks and balances. Separation of powers checks the various branches, while federalism checks the different levels of government. Under federalism, autonomous states with their own sphere of power can help prevent a national government from abusing its power.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Robert McDonald 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Elections & The Great Compromise Of 1787: Proportional Representation & Voting Power Per State – Guest Essayist: Robert McDonald, Robert McDonald

Elections & The Great Compromise Of 1787: Proportional Representation & Voting Power Per State

The democratic republic that resulted was to be a means to an end even greater than itself. Although the framers of the Constitution imagined different ways to achieve their goal, they refused to compromise their commitment to secure the blessings of liberty.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Midterm Elections: Purpose And Importance For Successful Functioning Of Congress – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Midterm Elections: Purpose And Importance For Successful Functioning Of Congress

“The House of Representatives is so constituted as to support in the members an habitual recollection of their dependence on the people. Before the sentiments impressed on their minds by the mode of their elevation can be effaced by the exercise of power, they will be compelled to anticipate the moment when their power is to cease, when their exercise of it is to be reviewed, and when they must descend to the level from which they were raised; there forever to remain unless a faithful discharge of their trust shall have established their title to a renewal of it.” Federalist No. 57

The Senate, having six year terms for its members, would be a defense against, “particular moments in public affairs when the people, stimulated by some irregular passion, or some illicit advantage, or misled by the artful misrepresentations of interested men, may call for measures which they themselves will afterwards be the most ready to lament and condemn.” Federalist No 63

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, The Honorable Frank M. Reilly 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Counting The Personal Cost: Impact Running For Elected Office & Serving In Congress Has On Members And Their Families – Guest Essayist: James D. Best, James D. Best

Counting The Personal Cost: Impact Running For Elected Office & Serving In Congress Has On Members And Their Families

Being a congressperson or senator is like having three jobs that consume every waking moment. The two chambers also make different demands on families…

Dealing with reality versus perception presented another challenge. Issues and people in the media are distorted for political purposes. Politicians understand that the opposition will build misperceptions about who they are, what they’re doing, and why they’re doing it. It comes with the territory. But spouses, children, and other relatives must live daily with slanted attacks on one of their beloved family members.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, The Honorable Frank M. Reilly 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Campaign Finance: A History, Related Laws, And Impact On Running For Congress – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Frank M. Reilly, The Honorable Frank Reilly

Campaign Finance: A History, Related Laws, And Impact On Running For Congress

Over the last 111 years, Congress has sought to regulate how its own elections are financed. Like most regulations, campaign finance laws have become increasingly more intensive and complex, though the U.S. Supreme Court has occasionally stepped in when Congress has overstepped either the powers granted to it in Article I of the Constitution, or the First Amendment rights of candidates, citizens, or associations of citizens.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Election Of Congress: Why Election Method Matters For Stability And Continuity Of Representative Government – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter, Gary R. Porter

Election Of Congress: Why Election Method Matters For Stability And Continuity Of Representative Government

The “election method” of Congress has many facets: who is entitled to vote, how they vote, even such mundane things as how votes are counted (does a hanging chad count?). As Madison reminds us: “the essence of government is power and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Direct Election And How The Number Of Constituents Per Congressional District Affects Representation – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, Joerg W. Knipprath

Direct Election And How The Number Of Constituents Per Congressional District Affects Representation

James Madison observed in Federalist 52, “[I]t is particularly essential that the [House of Representatives] should have an … intimate sympathy with, the people.” At the same time, he wrote four essays later, “The truth is, that in all cases, a certain number at least seems to be necessary to secure the benefits of free consultation and discussion; and to guard against too easy a combination for improper purposes: as on the other hand, the number ought at most to be kept within a certain limit, in order to avoid the confusion and intemperance of a multitude….Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter, Rule Of Law: Do Our Laws Apply To All? – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

Rule Of Law: Do Our Laws Apply To All?

“[W]here there is no law, there is no liberty; and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community,” wrote Founder Benjamin Rush in a 1788 letter to David Ramsay. (Emphasis added) Do our laws apply to all?

Interpreting Benjamin Rush, do these laws deserve the name of law if they only apply to “ordinary Americans” and not the elite of Congress?

The Rule of Law should be the bedrock of our society; but this “bedrock” has the appearance today of shifting sand.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Gary R. Porter, Rule Of Law As The Bedrock Of American Society – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

Rule Of Law As The Bedrock Of American Society

“If it be asked, What is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of our security in a Republic? The answer would be, an inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws — the first growing out of the last.” – Alexander Hamilton

“Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny,” said Englishman Edmund Burke. The Roman historian Tacitus expressed a similar sentiment: “Formerly we suffered from crimes. Now we suffer from laws.” “[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them,” complained “Candidus” in the Boston Gazette on January 20, 1772. Finally, a civil law which contravenes natural law is either “spoilt law” (Thomas Aquinas) or of “no validity” (Blackstone).

Rule Of Law And Separation Of Powers: Preservers Of Liberty

A tendency is not inevitability, however, and rule of law and separation of powers are important facets of a constitution of liberty, though these must be fought for continually because they don’t arise naturally, and they won’t remain in place tomorrow just because they are here today. Liberty is a perpetual struggle against forces of social and political entropy.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Marc Clauson, Rule Of Law: Accountable, Not Arbitrary, In Regards To Representing The American People – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

Rule Of Law: Accountable, Not Arbitrary, In Regards To Representing The American People

“The most important demand of the Rule of Law is that people in positions of authority should exercise their power within a constraining framework of well-established public norms rather than in an arbitrary, ad hoc, or purely discretionary manner on the basis of their own preferences or ideology. It insists that the government should operate within a framework of law in everything it does, and that it should be accountable through law when there is a suggestion of unauthorized action by those in power.”

The essential idea is that no ruler or governing body is above the law, even those who actually make those laws.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Adam MacLeod, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Adam Macleod, Rule Of Law: Meaning And Importance To Functions Of Congress In Representing The American People – Guest Essayist: Adam MacLeod

Rule Of Law: Meaning And Importance To Functions Of Congress In Representing The American People

The phrase, “the rule of law,” means that the power and discretion of those who exercise government powers is constrained. Officials may not do whatever they want. They must instead act according to rules, rights, customs, and other laws. This is the significance of John Adams’s classic formulation, which he enshrined in the Massachusetts Constitution, that the goal of the Constitution was to produce a “government of laws, and not of men.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Cox Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Barbara Jordan (1936-1996) (D-TX) – Congresswoman And Judiciary Committee Member – Guest Essayist: Patrick Cox, Patrick Cox

Barbara Jordan (1936-1996) (D-TX) – Congresswoman And Judiciary Committee Member

“My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total. I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution. It is reason and not passion which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.” – Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX) speaking during the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings on President Richard Nixon, July 25, 1974.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, James D. Best, Representative Government: The Founders’ Design For The American People To Rule Within A Civil Society – Guest Essayist: James D. Best

Representative Government: The Founders’ Design For The American People To Rule Within A Civil Society

The Framers knew the country needed a stouter government than the Articles of Confederation provided, but they had only recently fought a war to escape a king and had no intention of reimposing that kind of oppressive power on the new nation. The country needed a stronger government, but not so strong it could override the will of the people.

James Madison wrote, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” He and his fellow delegates enabled this objective by enumerating specific, balanced powers to each branch, and then purposely giving each branch checks on the other branches. First balance powers between the branches of government, and then place checks on those powers so they may not be abused. As the first three words of the Constitution assert, the Framers felt the American people should rule the government, not vice versa.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, Virginia House Of Burgesses And Colonial Legislatures As The Basis For Consent And American Self-Government – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Virginia House Of Burgesses And Colonial Legislatures As The Basis For Consent And American Self-Government

If Congress concerned itself only with matters necessarily national or international in scope, this view need not raise concerns. But as Congress busies itself with more and greater intrusions into personal decisions, such as health insurance, one might ponder if the same alienation felt by Americans of the 1770s towards the far-away British government is not felt 250 years later by Americans towards their own. Do such laws still meaningfully reflect the consent of the governed so emphatically proclaimed by the House of Burgesses against the Stamp Act?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Holding Power Accountable: Magna Carta, Parliament, And The Origins Of Representative Congress – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Holding Power Accountable: Magna Carta, Parliament, And The Origins Of Representative Congress

Magna Carta’s revolutionary concept of holding the King accountable for a breach of contract with England’s nobles was broadened in the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson established rights above Common Law and Medieval precedents with the famous phrase, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Magna Carta (The Great Charter), Parliament And The Origins Of Representative Congress – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson, Marc Clauson

Magna Carta (The Great Charter), Parliament And The Origins Of Representative Congress

The final version of the American Congress can be traced back to the Magna Carta itself, but in addition, our Founders drew on a rich source of political ideas that developed throughout the same period from Magna Carta on. The initiating event then was the core of the British “Ancient Constitution,” but the foundation was the growing notion that the people ought to play a greater role in making laws. The representative body was the mechanism to achieve that goal.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, The Honorable Frank M. Reilly 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, The Challenge Of Congressional Representation (2013) By Richard Fenno: A Summary – Guest Essayist: The Honorable Frank Reilly, The Honorable Frank Reilly

The Challenge Of Congressional Representation (2013) By Richard Fenno: A Summary

“There’s a natural tension between being a good representative and taking an interest in government,” said Conable. Toward the end of his Congressional career, he began to believe his interest in government was beginning to overtake his desire to be a good representative.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Newt Gingrich (1943) – House Speaker, Republican Whip From Georgia; Led The 1994 Contract With America – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Newt Gingrich (1943) – House Speaker, Republican Whip From Georgia; Led The 1994 Contract With America

Rep. Thomas Reed (R-ME) comes closest to Gingrich’s impact on the Legislative Branch. Reed was known for his communication ability, and his mastery of parliamentary procedure. As speaker (1889-1891/1895-1899) he mastered both of these skills to bring the House of Representatives back into alignment with the original rules written by Thomas Jefferson. Many consider his success assured the “survival of representative government”. Gingrich remains an insightful commentator and provocative thinker. Returning the House to the rule of law, and being highly responsive to the will of the voter, remain lasting historic achievements that strengthened our democracy.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) – Senate Member From New York, Democratic Party Leader – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) – Senate Member From New York, Democratic Party Leader

Moynihan is one of a dying breed in Washington- someone who effectively could interact with members and presidents from the opposing political party and who as Avalon notes tried to bring the long perspective to various issues.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Henry J. Hyde (1924-2007) (R-IL) – House Majority Leader, Judiciary Committee Chairman – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

Henry J. Hyde (1924-2007) (R-IL) – House Majority Leader, Judiciary Committee Chairman

A true gentleman of the House, he advanced his principles without rancor and earned the respect of friends and adversaries alike.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, Thomas Phillip, Jr. (Tip) O’Neill (1912-1994) – House Speaker, Democratic Whip & Majority Leader From Massachusetts – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

Thomas Phillip, Jr. (Tip) O’Neill (1912-1994) – House Speaker, Democratic Whip & Majority Leader From Massachusetts

While Tip and Reagan had different political views and approaches, they showed that great debates and the efforts of compromise sometimes can result in good end results for the nation.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Robert Taft (1889-1953) – State Representative, U.S. Senator From Ohio; Son Of President William Howard Taft – Guest Essayist: Tony William, Tony Williams

Robert Taft (1889-1953) – State Representative, U.S. Senator From Ohio; Son Of President William Howard Taft

Taft was known as “Mr. Republican” because of his allegiance to limited government at home and a non-interventionist foreign policy that represented mainstream Republican thinking during the mid-twentieth century. While not the most gregarious politician, he was a well-respected, diligent statesman who dedicated his life to an ideal of public service.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James Legee 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, James Legee, Michael Mansfield (1903-2001) House Member & Senate Majority Leader From Montana – Guest Essayist: James Legee

Michael Mansfield (1903-2001) House Member & Senate Majority Leader From Montana

Michael Joseph Mansfield served as both representative and senator from the state of Montana, and would go on to serve as United States Ambassador to Japan. Mansfield was born March 16, 1903 in New York though his life soon took a turn for the difficult.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) (1908-1973) 36th U.S. President, Vice President, House Member, Senate Minority & Majority Leader From Texas – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) (1908-1973) 36th U.S. President, Vice President, House Member, Senate Minority & Majority Leader From Texas

LBJ is remembered for his significant legislative achievements both as a member of Congress over a long period of time and in his Vice President and President roles.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Bruce Dierenfield, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Bruce Dierenfield, Howard Worth Smith (1883-1976) – House Member From Virginia, Rules Committee Chairman – Guest Essayist: Bruce Dierenfield

Howard Worth Smith (1883-1976) – House Member From Virginia, Rules Committee Chairman

Howard W. Smith, a Virginia Democratic congressman, was one of America’s most powerful politicians from the New Deal to the Great Society. A master obstructionist who chaired the House Rules Committee, he used his power to fight the liberal agendas of presidential administrations from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Lyndon B. Johnson.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Cox Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Patrick Cox, Samuel Rayburn (1882-1961) – House Speaker From Texas – Guest Essayist: Patrick Cox

Samuel Rayburn (1882-1961) – House Speaker From Texas

Samuel Taliaferro Rayburn was one of the most influential and respected leaders in American history. Rayburn served with distinction as he achieved many important changes to American society, government and the nation’s economy. Rayburn holds the record for serving longer than any other Speaker of the House in U.S. history. According to longtime friend and colleague Congressman Richard Bolling, Rayburn was cleverly described as the “baldest and levelest head in Washington.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joseph Postell, Ph.D., Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joseph Postell PhD, Sam Postell, Thomas Brackett Reed (1839-1902) – House Speaker From Maine Known For “Reed’s Rules” – Guest Essayists: Joseph Postell & Samuel Postell

Thomas Brackett Reed (1839-1902) – House Speaker From Maine Known For “Reed’s Rules”

Today’s Congress accomplishes a lot less than the one over which Reed presided because party leaders no longer have the powers that Reed created. Majority party cohesion has been undermined, and the leaders of the majority party are increasingly incapable of advancing necessary reforms. As a result, the people increasingly look to the President. Studying Reed’s vision for the House of Representatives reveals another possibility: with stronger parties, Congress can maintain its own authority, and accomplish the business of the people more efficiently, than it does today. Reed and his rules illustrate a potential solution for the disappearing role of Congress in contemporary American politics.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, James G. Blaine (1830-1893) – House Speaker & Senate Member From Maine, Secretary Of State, Presidential Candidate – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

James G. Blaine (1830-1893) – House Speaker & Senate Member From Maine, Secretary Of State, Presidential Candidate

James G. Blaine was a politician from Maine who first served in the Maine House of Representatives and then moved to the federal stage, where he became Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, a United States Senator, Secretary of State and Republican nominee for President. Nicknamed “the Magnetic Man,” Blaine was one of the leaders of the Republican Party during the late 19th Century and one of the great debaters.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Ben Phibbs, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Ben Phibbs, Thomas Hart Benton (1782-1858) – Missouri House & Senate Member – Guest Essayist: Ben Phibbs

Thomas Hart Benton (1782-1858) – Missouri House & Senate Member

LISTEN ON SOUNDCLOUD: “For the President and the Party: The Loyal Career of Senator Thomas Hart Benton” “Now you…rascal, I am going to punish you. Defend yourself!”[1] The taunt ferociously barreled into the infant autumn air of Nashville, Tennessee, flying comfortably from the tongue of a notorious brawler with a slender, scarred frame that lamented […]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Webster (1782-1852) – Secretary Of State, New Hampshire House & Senate Member, Known As “The Great Orator,” Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, Joerg W. Knipprath

Daniel Webster (1782-1852) – Secretary Of State, New Hampshire House & Senate Member, Known As “The Great Orator,” Part 2

In a speech in 1837, he issued a warning free citizens must never forget, “There are men, in all ages, who mean to exercise power usefully; but who mean to exercise it. They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind masters; but they mean to be masters.”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Webster (1782-1852) – Secretary Of State, New Hampshire House & Senate Member, Known As The "Great Orator” – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, Joerg W. Knipprath

Daniel Webster (1782-1852) – Secretary Of State, New Hampshire House & Senate Member, Known As The “Great Orator”

Daniel Webster, alongside Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, was a member of the “Great Triumvirate,” that remarkable group of speakers whose grand and widely-circulated speeches enlivened debates in the Senate and electrified the American people. Webster, the “Great Orator,”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) – Seventh U.S. Vice President, South Carolina House & Senate Member, Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) – Seventh U.S. Vice President, South Carolina House & Senate Member, Part 2

Calhoun’s approach to consent of the governed, as expressed through concurrent majorities of the whole and of its affected constituent minorities, presents a relevant model for peaceful resolution of fundamental political questions that well preserves both “Liberty and Union” in a large, diverse, and divided country.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) – Seventh U.S. Vice President, South Carolina House & Senate Member – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) – Seventh U.S. Vice President, South Carolina House & Senate Member

For nearly the first half of the nineteenth century, three men dominated the debates over the great issues of the day. They were the “Great Triumvirate,” Henry Clay of Kentucky, Daniel Webster of Massachusetts, and John C. Calhoun of South Carolina. Continued tomorrow

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Sam Postell 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Henry Clay (1777-1852) – House Speaker, Whig Party Leader, Kentucky Senate Member – Guest Essayist: Sam Postell, Sam Postell

Henry Clay (1777-1852) – House Speaker, Whig Party Leader, Kentucky Senate Member

…the first to understand that Congress was in need of leadership if it were to be understood as an important power of the government rather than a mere servant of the president. Although he was a man of action, his speeches bequeath a rich knowledge of constitutional theory that allow us to appreciate the importance of the rules and orders of the legislature.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Brian J. Pawlowski, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Brian J. Pawlowski, John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) – Sixth U.S. President, Massachusetts House & Senate Member – Guest Essayist: Brian Pawlowski

John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) – Sixth U.S. President, Massachusetts House & Senate Member

LISTEN ON SOUNDCLOUD: While John Quincy Adams was not an exact contemporary of the Founding Fathers he was, in more ways than one, their offspring. Indeed, his bond with the generation of 1776 was familial as well as philosophical. And his sense of duty to that generation, the project they set in motion, and the […]

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, The Great Debates – Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

The Great Debates – Civil Rights Act of 1964

On June 11, 1963, President John F. Kennedy issued his Report to the American People on Civil Rights, calling on Congress to pass a civil rights bill to address discrimination and segregation against African Americans.

Entry Into WWII And The America First Debate, Part 2

On December 10, 1941, the America First Committee dissolved. Shortly beforehand, on December 8 of 1941, Congress voted for war with Japan. The vote was nearly unanimous and the sole vote against war came not from a member of America First.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Cleta Mitchell, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Cleta Mitchell

The Great Debates – The Nineteenth Amendment

One hundred and thirty years after ratification of the United States Constitution, women were, at long last, granted full citizenship and voting rights in America. The Nineteenth Amendment is a piece of the struggle for freedom that had eluded half of America’s population for more than a century.

Entry Into WWII And The America First Debate

As the pace and seriousness of events quickened, a broad coalition of isolationists and anti-war activists came together to form the America First Committee.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Henry Cabot Lodge Senate Debate Of 1919 & The Treaty Of Versailles – Guest Essayist Tony Williams, Tony Williams

Henry Cabot Lodge Senate Debate Of 1919 & The Treaty Of Versailles

Throughout the debate over the Treaty of Versailles and League of Nations, Senator Lodge stood firmly for the American Constitution and its principles. He did support world peace and hoped to avert another world war, but he would not sacrifice American principles in an attempt to achieve it. He sought to do what was right according to the Constitution.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, Stephen A. Douglas & Abraham Lincoln In Congressional Debate: The Compromise Of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854 – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

Stephen A. Douglas & Abraham Lincoln In Congressional Debate: The Compromise Of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

Known as “the Little Giant,” Stephen A. Douglas was a politician from Illinois who designed the Kansas-Nebraska Act and served as a member of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and was the Democratic Party nominee for president against Abraham Lincoln in the election of 1860. Lincoln and Douglas also faced each other during the 1858 race for Senator from Illinois, and the two engaged in a series of famous debates on the question of slavery and the future of our nation. Named the Little Giant because he was small in stature, he was not little when it came to politics and his place in our history as a great debater.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, The Great Debates – Robert Hayne’s 1830 Senate Speech & Daniel Webster’s Reply – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

The Great Debates – Robert Hayne’s 1830 Senate Speech & Daniel Webster’s Reply, Part 2

Webster returned fire. In a speech equally aroused as Hayne’s, and laced with historical references, constitutional argument, and heavy doses of sarcasm, Webster rejected Hayne’s attacks and painted a picture of an optimistic nationalism that stood in stark contrast to Hayne’s defensiveness.

The Great Debates – Robert Hayne’s 1830 Senate Speech & Daniel Webster’s Reply

Over the course of approximately a week in late January, 1830, a debate occurred in the United States Senate that historians consider the greatest ever in that chamber. Before a gallery packed with listeners, under the animated gaze of Vice-President John C. Calhoun, Senators Robert Hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts waged an oratorical battle.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Daniel Cotter, The Great Debates – Congress & The Missouri Compromise Of 1820 – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter

The Great Debates – Congress & The Missouri Compromise Of 1820

But the three days of debate prior to passage have been described as “rancorous” and “fiery” and “blistering,”

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, The Role Of Congress In Creation & Constitutionality Of The National Bank, Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, Tony Williams

The Role Of Congress In Creation & Constitutionality Of The National Bank, Part 2

The First Congress was deeply divided over policies at the very start of the new nation. The debates generally centered around the economic policies and financial plans of Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton. The contention about the National Bank in particular generally revealed a sectional and increasing partisan divide between the Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Joerg W. Knipprath, The Role Of Congress In Creation & Constitutionality Of The National Bank – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

The Role Of Congress In Creation & Constitutionality Of The National Bank

The vote was the result of a political maneuver to accommodate a matter of much more immediate impact, the realization of Alexander Hamilton’s economic salvage blueprint for the new nation. That blueprint proved crucial to the country’s economic and political fortunes. At the same time, it opened fissures of sectional conflict, constitutional theory, and political partisanship that had remained below the surface, if barely, during the preceding decade.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, David Alvis, Flagg Taylor 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, David Alvis, Flagg Taylor, The Decision Of 1789: Congress, The President & Removal Of Presidential Appointees – Guest Essayists: David Alvis & Flagg Taylor

The Decision Of 1789: Congress, The President & Removal Of Presidential Appointees

At stake in this struggle over removal power was more than the interior design of a particular department; this debate would shape the way in which the two elected branches of the federal government would relate to one another under the system of the separation of powers. For those who favored a significant role for Congress in the removal power, the concern was to at least check, if not entirely control the executive’s enforcement of law.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Brian J. Pawlowski, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Brian J. Pawlowski, Statesmanship & The Distinguished Oratory Of Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun – Guest Essayist: Brian Pawlowski

Statesmanship & The Distinguished Oratory Of Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun

Taken together, the political debates of Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John Calhoun guided American politics like no other group save the Founding generation. As Merrill D. Peterson put it, “their arrival on the political stage announced a new era of American statesmanship…

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Culture Of Debates On The House & Senate Floors – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

Culture Of Debates On The House & Senate Floors

Patrick Henry cautioned, “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.” In their respective chambers, the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives have developed unique ways to air differences and make sure information is shared. The Legislative Branch’s culture of debate hold’s power accountable and preserves our nation’s civic culture.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Forrest Nabors 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Federalist 63: The Senate And Our National Character – Guest Essayist: Forrest Nabors, Forrest Nabors

Federalist 63: The Senate And Our National Character

In crisis Americans are famous for forgetting their differences and pulling together, but the Senate was designed to be our natural rallying point. In the members of that body we were meant to see the best of our country, calmly reminding us of who we are as a people, and inspiring us by their example to follow the path of our duty.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Forrest Nabors 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Federalist 62: The Structure And Role Of The Senate – Guest Essayist: Forrest Nabors, Forrest Nabors

Federalist 62: The Structure And Role Of The Senate

Their coolness, experience and wisdom would balance the passions, inexperience and hastiness in the other body. Thus, the planned role of the Senate was vital to enacting wholesome and necessary national legislation, was indispensable to the general government and placed the American republic in a likely position to gain an estimable reputation among the nations.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2017, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Joseph M. Knippenberg 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Federalist 62 & 63: Senate Powers For Soundness, Order, Stability Of The Congress – Guest Essayist: Joseph M. Knippenberg, Joseph Knippenberg

Federalist 62 & 63: Senate Powers For Soundness, Order, Stability Of The Congress

A second legislative chamber “doubles the security to the people by requiring the concurrence of two distinct bodies in schemes of usurpation or perfidy.” The more hoops that have to be jumped through, the more groups that have to be coordinated, the harder it is for men (and women) bent on tyranny to accomplish their aims.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Happy Birthday, James Madison! March 16, 1751 - Federalist Papers 51 & 53: How The American People Hold Congress Accountable – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath, Joerg W. Knipprath

Happy Birthday, James Madison! March 16, 1751 – Federalist Papers 51 & 53: How The American People Hold Congress Accountable

Madison examines various suggested mechanisms by which government might be constrained and liberty preserved. Drawing on the Americans’ experience with the British government as well as their own state governments, he rejects all as insufficient. Thus, formal declarations in state constitutions of the legislative power being vested in the legislature, the executive in a chief officer, and the judicial in the courts, are “a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments” and would not suffice to prevent dangerous concentration of power.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Richard Wagner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Federalist 10: Political Stability And Good Governance - Guest Essayist: Richard Wagner, Richard Wagner

Federalist 10: Political Stability And Good Governance

Despite the ensuing controversy, we should note that both proponents and opponents of the new Constitution agreed that the prime purpose of government was to secure individual liberty. They also recognized that intrusive government was the prime danger to liberty, even though it was also recognized that some government was necessary to preserve and protect the American system of liberty.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, James Madison: Guiding The Bill Of Rights Through The U.S. House Of Representatives – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, Tony Williams

James Madison: Guiding The Bill Of Rights Through The U.S. House Of Representatives

Although he enumerated several reasons for his opposition, Madison then gave his friend hope when he stated that most important reason in favor of a Bill of Rights was that, “The political truths declared in that solemn manner acquire by degrees the character of fundamental maxims of free Government, and as they become incorporated with the National sentiment, counteract the impulses of interest and passion.” Madison thought the liberties would become engrained in the American character.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing – Part 3 – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, Patrick Garry

Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing – Part 3

Although the Antifederalist concern about limiting the power of the federal government provided the initial impetus for the Bill of Rights, the Bill does more than simply provide a restraint on government action. It seeks to preserve liberty by protecting particular areas traditionally considered essential to individual freedom and dignity.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, 90 Day Studies, Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing – Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter, Gary R. Porter

Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing – Part 2

Even as early as 1825, Thomas Jefferson was able to observe:

“I see,… and with the deepest affliction, the rapid strides with which the federal branch of our government is advancing towards the usurpation of all the rights reserved to the States, and the consolidation in itself of all powers, foreign and domestic; and that, too, by constructions which, if legitimate, leave no limits to their power…”

Was the Bill of Rights necessary?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Andrew Langer, Blog, Congress and the Constitution 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Andrew Langer, Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing – Guest Essayist: Andrew Langer

Bill Of Rights: Placing Limits On Congressional Governing

It was not America’s victory over England in 1781 that was a revolutionary miracle—for following the surrender at Yorktown any one of a number of things could have gone (and in some cases did do) wrong in the creation of our new nation. No, it was the creation of our Constitution and the adoption of the first ten amendments as a “Bill of Rights” that was the true miracle—since both, taken together, were based on a premise that had been unheard-of until that point.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Patrick Garry 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Articles Of Confederation – What The Founders Thought Of The Articles Of Confederation And Why They Did Not Last – Guest Essayist: Patrick Garry, Patrick Garry

Articles Of Confederation – What The Founders Thought Of The Articles Of Confederation And Why They Did Not Last

Although the Articles had demonstrated the need for a stronger national government, the primary threat to liberty was seen as emanating from such governments. Therefore, the preeminent debate of the time involved how to limit the new federal government so as to prevent it from having the power to commit the kind of abuses once committed by the British government. Liberty was to be protected by a system of limits on government power, not simply by the absence of government power.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Daniel Cotter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Articles of Confederation – Congress Wielded All Three Powers: Legislative, Judicial, Executive, Later Separated – Guest Essayist: Daniel A. Cotter, Daniel Cotter

Articles of Confederation – Congress Wielded All Three Powers: Legislative, Judicial, Executive, Later Separated

On November 15, 1777, the Continental Congress approved what was this newly declared independent nation’s first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. The Articles included a single governing body, the Continental Congress. Requiring unanimous ratification by all thirteen of the British colonies, it took until March 1, 1781, when Maryland ratified the Articles, for them to become effective. The Articles governed until 1789, when the United States Constitution replaced the Articles.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Gary Porter 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Gary R. Porter, The Declaration Of Independence And The United States Congress – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

The Declaration Of Independence And The United States Congress – Guest Essayist: Gary R. Porter

Each incoming Congress normally conducts a ceremonial reading of the Constitution in the first few days of the session. Some complain this is merely for show, that Congressmen and women then proceed to completely ignore their oaths to “support and defend the Constitution.” Perhaps there is some truth to this charge. But might we humbly suggest that before reading the Constitution, that Congress also read, out loud, the Declaration of Independence, and then take a moment (or several moments) to reflect on the “thought and spirit” of our government before proceeding with their appointed tasks?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Joerg W. Knipprath 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Joerg W. Knipprath, What A Republican Form Of Government Means & Why This Structure Mattered To America’s Constitution Framers – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

What A Republican Form Of Government Means & Why This Structure Mattered To America’s Constitution Framers – Guest Essayist: Joerg Knipprath

Under Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution, the United States shall guarantee to each state a republican form of government. That raises the question of what was understood not only by a “republican form” of government, but by the substance of republicanism.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James D. Best 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 2018 - Congress, 8. The Congress, James D. Best, 1841 The Presidency Of John Tyler, Why The Legislative Branch Is Listed First In Article I Of The United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: James D. Best

Why The Legislative Branch Is Listed First In Article I Of The United States Constitution – Guest Essayist: James D. Best

The Framers believed that power resided solely with the people, and now the people would judge their work. Would they approve?

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James Legee 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, James Legee, Legislative: Most Important Branch, Of The People, Whose Primary Role Is Lawmaking – Guest Essayist: James Legee

Legislative: Most Important Branch, Of The People, Whose Primary Role Is Lawmaking – Guest Essayist: James Legee

These are not minor implications. Congress has the most direct tie to the fount of power in America, the people. All laws, resolutions, chartered agencies, stem from the desires of the people. When congress fails to take the views into consideration, fails to refine them to compatibility with the constitution, with liberty, and with principles of justice, it has, as Webster notes, ceased to be a representative body.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Since The First U.S. Congress In 1789: Why, When & How The People’s Branch Convenes - Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, Tony Williams

Since The First U.S. Congress In 1789: Why, When & How The People’s Branch Convenes – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams

In the spring of 1789, several dozen representatives and senators from eleven states (North Carolina and Rhode Island had not yet ratified the Constitution) traveled to New York for the first session of the First Congress. Most fundamentally, they were assembling because the United States had a constitutional republican form of government based upon the consent of the governed.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, James Legee 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, James Legee, Senate History: Purpose Of The U.S. Senate, The "Cooling Factor" And "Sober Second Thought" - Guest Essayist: James Legee

Senate History: Purpose Of The U.S. Senate, The “Cooling Factor” And “Sober Second Thought” – Guest Essayist: James Legee

The Senate was intended to be the upper house of America’s Congress, a long-serving chamber of sober debate. Here, the passions of human nature, which history watched manifest into noble appeals to virtue and liberty as often as into the deplorable institution of slavery or the savagery of the French Revolution, were to be calmed and sober reason allowed to prevail.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Scot Faulkner 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, House History: Purpose Of The United States House of Representatives As The Immediate Will Of The People – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner, Scot Faulkner

House History: Purpose Of The United States House of Representatives As The Immediate Will Of The People – Guest Essayist: Scot Faulkner

When the U.S. House of Representatives meets, it draws upon this rich and deep history and set of precedents. It remains true to its origins: larger, rowdier, fractious, governed by rules and votes, and highly sensitive and responsive to the popular will and issues of the moment. This is in contrast to the slower pace, decorum, and informal agreements that characterize the Senate.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Marc Clauson 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Beginnings Of The United States Congress Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson, Marc Clauson

Beginnings Of The United States Congress Part 2 – Guest Essayist: Marc Clauson

No institutional arrangement is perfect, as no individual is perfect. The Founders valued design principles highly, but they also advocated for virtuous public officials. However, they knew they could not guarantee virtue at all times. Therefore, they took pains to design, in this case, a Congress that would give voice to the people while limiting the possible abuses of power in that Congress as well as in the other branches.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, Tony Williams 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, Beginnings Of The United States Congress – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams, Tony Williams

Beginnings Of The United States Congress – Guest Essayist: Tony Williams

As Representative James Madison reflected on the task of the First Congress, he stated, “We are in a wilderness without a single footstep to guide us.” Perhaps Madison was wrong for the representatives and senators had a few guides at their disposal. They had their experience in the state legislatures and the national Congress under the Articles of Confederation. In addition, they had their wisdom and prudence to pursue the public good in deliberative government. Most fundamentally, they had the new Constitution as the fundamental guide for all their actions.

6. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 90 in 90 2018, Blog, Congress and the Constitution, William Morrisey, Ph.D. 13. Guest Constitutional Scholar Essayists, 8. The Congress, INTRODUCTION Part 2: The United States Congress Today – Guest Essayist: William Morrisey, William Morrisey PhD

INTRODUCTION Part 2: The United States Congress Today – Guest Essayist: William Morrisey

The careful design of the United States federal government, as seen in our Constitution, has been admired and imitated throughout the world. Yet few Americans today think of their government as very much limited to matters of commerce, military defense, and constitutional law. Nor do we think of Congressmen as citizen-legislators, serving a few years in the nation’s capital and then returning home to the applause of grateful, armed, and vigilant fellow-citizens.

What has happened, since 1787?