Guest Essayist: James Robbins

Our Commissioners | Office of the Texas Governor | Greg Abbott
Essay Read by Constituting America Founder, Actress Janine Turner

 

“I have a rendezvous with Death,” wrote American poet Alan Seeger in 1916, envisioning sacrifice with almost romantic nobility. Like many young men of his generation, Seeger believed that service and even death in a great cause could give meaning to life. Killed while serving with the French Foreign Legion before the United States entered the First World War, his words foreshadowed the spirit of the generation of writers that emerged afterward and revealed how profoundly those hopes had been shaken.

In April 1917, young Americans marched off to Europe with enthusiasm and a sense of purpose. President Woodrow Wilson had asked Congress for a declaration of war to make the world “safe for democracy,” and many believed that the conflict would be “the war to end war.” People were willing to face great sacrifices because they believed this would secure a better and more peaceful world. 

Yet by the 1920s, the veterans and writers who came to be known as the Lost Generation, a term coined by Gertrude Stein and popularized by Ernest Hemingway, looked back with profound disillusionment. Their dissatisfaction arose not merely from the horrors they had endured but from the belief that the ideals for which they had fought had been compromised or abandoned.

The first act of this tragedy was framed by idealism. Many Americans willingly assumed obligations to the nation because they believed in the justice of its cause. They entered the First World War with high hopes and lofty aspirations. President Wilson spoke in moral terms, promising a world made safe for democracy and a peace that would prevent future conflicts. Many citizens willingly placed their lives in jeopardy because they trusted that their leaders were pursuing objectives worthy of a free people.

The second act brought a harsh awakening. In the trenches and battlefields of France, industrial warfare inflicted death and destruction on a scale previously unknown. Machine guns, poison gas, devastating artillery barrages, and mass casualties shattered the romantic notions of glory and heroism that had been nurtured since the Civil War. American poet John Allan Wyeth, who served with the American Expeditionary Forces, captured the confusion, exhaustion, and irony of war in his sonnet sequence This Man’s Army: A War in Fifty-odd Sonnets. Other American writers who experienced the war firsthand included Ernest Hemingway and John Dos Passos, who both portrayed the deeply human tragedy of war. The men who endured bombardments and carried the wounded understood that patriotism and sacrifice were real, but so were shattered bodies and broken lives. 

These writers did not merely lament the cruelty of war. They exposed the gulf between the abstract rhetoric of policymakers and the terrible realities borne by ordinary soldiers. Hemingway would later write that words such as “glory” and “honor” seemed obscene compared to the suffering of war. Dos Passos observed that “war is utter damn nonsense, a vast cancer fed by lies and self-seeking malignity on the part of those who don’t do the fighting.” Their writings served as a reminder that governments must speak truthfully to citizens and that free peoples deserve honesty about the costs of military conflict.

Yet the most enduring emotional wounds came after the guns fell silent. This was the third act of the tragedy, the squandered victory. The Versailles peace agreement saw American idealism, as summed up in President Wilson’s “14 Points,” swept aside by European power, politics, and imperialism. The war to make the world safe for democracy gave rise first to Russian Bolshevism and later to Fascism and Nazism. And the “war to end all war” set the conditions for an even more destructive conflict erupting two decades later. Looking backward, many veterans concluded that the lofty promises that had justified so much suffering had been abandoned.

This is the necessary context for understanding the Lost Generation. Its members were not united by cynicism so much as by broken expectations. They had believed that their sacrifices would usher in a new age. Instead, they found a world that appeared to have learned little from catastrophe. Their dissatisfaction reflected not merely revulsion at war itself but disillusionment with the results achieved in its aftermath.

Veteran writers such as John Wyeth, Ernest Hemingway, and John Dos Passos expressed skepticism toward grand rhetoric and distrust toward leaders who spoke in exalted terms while failing to achieve the ends for which so many had suffered. Their message was a warning about the fragility of trust between the people and those who govern them.

The experience of the First World War thus offers an enduring lesson about popular consent. Governments may ask much of free citizens, even their lives, but they incur solemn obligations in return. Leaders must be truthful about the costs of war, prudent in their conduct, and faithful to the principles they invoke. Citizens may willingly bear extraordinary burdens when they believe those burdens serve noble purposes, but trust once broken is not easily restored.

The tragedy of the Lost Generation was not simply that young Americans encountered the horrors of war; it was that many came to believe that the ideals for which they had fought had been merely empty rhetoric. Their testimony reminds succeeding generations of the importance of nurturing the continuing trust and consent of the people. Preserving that trust is among the highest responsibilities of republican government. It requires wisdom, honesty, and fidelity to the purposes for which free people are asked to sacrifice.

 

Dr. James S. Robbins is Senior Vice President for Research and Business Development at the Institute of World Politics, and a Senior Fellow for National Security Affairs at the American Foreign Policy Council. A historian, educator, and commentator, he is the author of five books and more than 2,000 articles and columns on national security, foreign policy, and American history. He previously served as Senior Editorial Writer for The Washington Times and spent ten years in government as a counter-terrorism specialist. A frequent television and radio guest, he has taught and advised students, military officers, and policymakers for more than three decades.

 

Click here to receive our Daily 90-Day Study Essay emailed directly to your inbox.

Click here for the essay schedule with today’s essay and previously published essays hyperlinked.

0 replies

Join the discussion! Post your comments below.

Your feedback and insights are welcome.
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *